Literature DB >> 22210403

Evaluation of an asymmetry parameter for curve-fitting in single-chemical and mixture toxicity assessment.

Douglas A Dawson1, Nicole Genco, Heather M Bensinger, Daphne Guinn, Zachary J Il'giovine, T Wayne Schultz, Gerald Pöch.   

Abstract

In mixture toxicity, concentration-effect data are often used to generate conclusions on combined effect. While models of combined effect are available for such assessments, proper fitting of the data is critical to obtaining accurate conclusions. In this study an asymmetry parameter (s) was evaluated for data-fitting and compared with our previous approach. Inhibition of bioluminescence was assessed with Vibrio fischeri at 15, 30 and 45-min of exposure with seven or eight concentrations and a control (each duplicated) for each single-chemical (A or B) and mixture (A:B). Concentration-effect data were fitted to sigmoid curves using the four-parameter logistic function (4PL) and the five-parameter logistic minus one-parameter (5PL-1P) function. For the 4PL, parameters included minimum effect, maximum effect, EC(50) and slope, while for the 5PL-1P the minimum effect parameter was removed and an asymmetry parameter was added. A total of 72 mixture toxicity data sets were evaluated, representing 432 single-chemical and 216 mixture curves. Mean coefficients of determination (r(2)) for all 648 curves showed that the 5PL-1P gave better fitting (0.9982 ± 0.0018) than the 4PL (0.9973 ± 0.0030). For both functions, the sum-of-squares of the residuals (SS-Res) was determined for each curve. The 5-parameter rational regression best described the relationship between the decrease in sum-of-squares of the residuals (i.e., 4PL: SS-Res - 5PL-1P: SS-Res) and log s, with fitting improved the most at low values of s (s<0.8). This held even when curves with r(2) values ≤ 0.9970 were removed from the analyses. Subsequent review of the combined effects obtained via the 4PL and the 5PL-1P functions resulted in a change in the interpretation of combined effect in 39/216 (18%) cases.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22210403      PMCID: PMC3265761          DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2011.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  17 in total

1.  Assessing the (a)symmetry of concentration-effect curves: empirical versus mechanistic models.

Authors:  Jesús Giraldo; Nuria M Vivas; Elisabet Vila; Albert Badia
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.310

2.  Chemical mixture toxicity testing with Vibrio fischeri: combined effects of binary mixtures for ten soft electrophiles.

Authors:  Douglas A Dawson; Gerald Pöch; T Wayne Schultz
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  The five-parameter logistic: a characterization and comparison with the four-parameter logistic.

Authors:  Paul G Gottschalk; John R Dunn
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Time dependence in mixture toxicity with soft electrophiles: 1. Combined effects of selected SN2- and SNAr-reactive agents with a nonpolar narcotic.

Authors:  E M Gagan; M W Hull; T W Schultz; G Pöch; D A Dawson
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  The search for synergy: a critical review from a response surface perspective.

Authors:  W R Greco; G Bravo; J C Parsons
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  Mixture toxicity of S(N)2-reactive soft electrophiles: 2-evaluation of mixtures containing ethyl α-halogenated acetates.

Authors:  D A Dawson; T Mooneyham; J Jeyaratnam; T W Schultz; G Pöch
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Interactive toxicity of simple chemical mixtures of cadmium, mercury, methylmercury and trimethyltin: model-dependent responses.

Authors:  Joel G Pounds; Jamal Haider; D G Chen; Moiz Mumtaz
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.860

Review 8.  Toxicology of chemical mixtures: experimental approaches, underlying concepts, and some results.

Authors:  R S Yang; H L Hong; G A Boorman
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 9.  Physiological modeling of toxicokinetic interactions: implications for mixture risk assessment.

Authors:  S Haddad; K Krishnan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Evaluating the toxicity of chemical mixtures.

Authors:  Gerald A LeBlanc; Allen W Olmstead
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  7 in total

1.  A concentration addition model to assess activation of the pregnane X receptor (PXR) by pesticide mixtures found in the French diet.

Authors:  Georges de Sousa; Ahmad Nawaz; Jean-Pierre Cravedi; Roger Rahmani
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  New models for the time dependent toxicity of individual and combined toxicants.

Authors:  Ronald J W Lambert; Douglas A Dawson
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Time-dependence in mixture toxicity prediction.

Authors:  Douglas A Dawson; Erin M G Allen; Joshua L Allen; Hannah J Baumann; Heather M Bensinger; Nicole Genco; Daphne Guinn; Michael W Hull; Zachary J Il'Giovine; Chelsea M Kaminski; Jennifer R Peyton; T Wayne Schultz; Gerald Pöch
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Mixture toxicity of SN2-reactive soft electrophiles: 3. Evaluation of ethyl α-halogenated acetates with α-halogenated acetonitriles.

Authors:  D A Dawson; G Pöch; T W Schultz
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Evaluation of consistency for multiple experiments of a single combination in the time-dependence mixture toxicity assay.

Authors:  D A Dawson; G Pöch
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.987

6.  An automated fitting procedure and software for dose-response curves with multiphasic features.

Authors:  Giovanni Y Di Veroli; Chiara Fornari; Ian Goldlust; Graham Mills; Siang Boon Koh; Jo L Bramhall; Frances M Richards; Duncan I Jodrell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Evaluation of time-dependent toxicity and combined effects for a series of mono-halogenated acetonitrile-containing binary mixtures.

Authors:  Douglas A Dawson; Daphne Guinn; Gerald Pöch
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2016-07-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.