OBJECTIVE: To compare the in vitro sensitivity/resistance to patupilone versus paclitaxel in uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas (CS). METHODS: Five primary carcinosarcoma cell lines, two from uterine and three of ovarian origin, were evaluated for growth rate and tested for their in vitro sensitivity/resistance to patupilone versus paclitaxel by MTS assays. To identify potential mechanisms underlying the differential sensitivity/resistance to patupilone, expression levels of β-tubulin III (TUBB3) were determined with quantitative-real-time-polymerase-chain-reaction (q-RT-PCR) in primary uterine and ovarian CS cell lines and in 26 uterine and 9 ovarian CS fresh-frozen-tissues. RESULTS: No appreciable difference in sensitivity to patupilone versus paclitaxel was noted in ovarian CS cell lines, or when uterine and ovarian CS cell lines were compared in their response to paclitaxel. In contrast, uterine CS cell lines were found to be significantly more sensitive to patupilone than to paclitaxel (P<0.002) and demostrated lower IC(50s) to patupilone (range 0.76-0.93nM) when compared to ovarian CS (range 1.9-3.4 nM, p<0.05). Higher levels of TUBB3 were detected in uterine CS cell lines and fresh frozen tissues when compared to ovarian CS (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Uterine CS cell lines are significantly more sensitive than ovarian CS cell lines to patupilone versus paclitaxel. High expression of TUBB3 is associated with sensitivity to patupilone in primary CS cell lines and may act as a genetic marker to predict chemotherapy efficacy. Patupilone may represent a promising drug in the treatment of this subset of rare but highly aggressive gynecological tumors. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE: To compare the in vitro sensitivity/resistance to patupilone versus paclitaxel in uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas (CS). METHODS: Five primary carcinosarcoma cell lines, two from uterine and three of ovarian origin, were evaluated for growth rate and tested for their in vitro sensitivity/resistance to patupilone versus paclitaxel by MTS assays. To identify potential mechanisms underlying the differential sensitivity/resistance to patupilone, expression levels of β-tubulin III (TUBB3) were determined with quantitative-real-time-polymerase-chain-reaction (q-RT-PCR) in primary uterine and ovarian CS cell lines and in 26 uterine and 9 ovarian CS fresh-frozen-tissues. RESULTS: No appreciable difference in sensitivity to patupilone versus paclitaxel was noted in ovarian CS cell lines, or when uterine and ovarian CS cell lines were compared in their response to paclitaxel. In contrast, uterine CS cell lines were found to be significantly more sensitive to patupilone than to paclitaxel (P<0.002) and demostrated lower IC(50s) to patupilone (range 0.76-0.93nM) when compared to ovarian CS (range 1.9-3.4 nM, p<0.05). Higher levels of TUBB3 were detected in uterine CS cell lines and fresh frozen tissues when compared to ovarian CS (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Uterine CS cell lines are significantly more sensitive than ovarian CS cell lines to patupilone versus paclitaxel. High expression of TUBB3 is associated with sensitivity to patupilone in primary CS cell lines and may act as a genetic marker to predict chemotherapy efficacy. Patupilone may represent a promising drug in the treatment of this subset of rare but highly aggressive gynecological tumors. Copyright Â
Authors: Daniel Paik; Emiliano Cocco; Stefania Bellone; Francesca Casagrande; Marta Bellone; Eric E Siegel; Christine E Richter; Peter E Schwartz; Thomas J Rutherford; Alessandro D Santin Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2010-07-31 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Howard D Homesley; Virginia Filiaci; Maurie Markman; Pincas Bitterman; Lynne Eaton; Larry C Kilgore; Bradley J Monk; Frederick R Ueland Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Wim W Ten Bokkel Huinink; Jozef Sufliarsky; Willem M Smit; Stanislav Spanik; Maria Wagnerova; Hal W Hirte; Stan Kaye; Anandhi R Johri; Amit M Oza Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Koen De Geest; John A Blessing; Robert T Morris; S Diane Yamada; Bradley J Monk; Susan L Zweizig; Daniela Matei; Carolyn Y Muller; William E Richards Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Divya Gupta; Ricky L Owers; Mimi Kim; Dennis Yi-Shin Kuo; Gloria S Huang; Shohreh Shahabi; Gary L Goldberg; Mark H Einstein Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: G Carles; D Braguer; C Dumontet; V Bourgarel; A Gonçalves; M Sarrazin; J B Rognoni; C Briand Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Dana M Roque; Natalia Buza; Michelle Glasgow; Stefania Bellone; Ileana Bortolomai; Sara Gasparrini; Emiliano Cocco; Elena Ratner; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi; Thomas J Rutherford; Peter E Schwartz; Alessandro D Santin Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Alexander Quaas; Amir-Hossein Rahvar; Christoph Burdelski; Christina Koop; Christian Eichelberg; Michael Rink; Roland Dahlem; Thorsten Schlomm; Maria Christina Tsourlakis; Ronald Simon; Sarah Minner; Guido Sauter; Stefan Steurer Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-12-21 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Carolyn K McCourt; Wei Deng; Don S Dizon; Heather A Lankes; Michael J Birrer; Michele M Lomme; Matthew A Powell; James E Kendrick; Joel N Saltzman; David Warshal; Meaghan E Tenney; David M Kushner; Carol Aghajanian Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Dana M Roque; Stefania Bellone; Diana P English; Natalia Buza; Emiliano Cocco; Sara Gasparrini; Ileana Bortolomai; Elena Ratner; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi; Thomas J Rutherford; Peter E Schwartz; Alessandro D Santin Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Doris Höflmayer; Eray Öztürk; Cornelia Schroeder; Claudia Hube-Magg; Niclas C Blessin; Ronald Simon; Dagmar S Lang; Emily Neubauer; Cosima Göbel; Marie-Christine Heinrich; Christoph Fraune; Katharina Möller; Moritz Armbrust; Morton Freytag; Andrea Hinsch; Clara Lühr; Magdalena Noack; Viktor Reiswich; Sören Weidemann; Maximilian Bockhorn; Daniel Perez; Jakob R Izbicki; Guido Sauter; Frank Jacobsen Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Jocelyn Reader; Amy K Harper; Teklu Legesse; Paul N Staats; Olga Goloubeva; Gautam G Rao; Amy Fulton; Dana M Roque Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Patrick Lebok; Melike Öztürk; Uwe Heilenkötter; Fritz Jaenicke; Volkmar Müller; Peter Paluchowski; Stefan Geist; Christian Wilke; Eicke Burandt; Annette Lebeau; Waldemar Wilczak; Till Krech; Ronald Simon; Guido Sauter; Alexander Quaas Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 2.967