Literature DB >> 22209773

Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the nerve trauma in cardinal ligament.

Chunlin Chen1, Weili Li, Fengjuan Li, Ping Liu, Jing Zhou, Lin Lu, Guidong Su, Xiangzhao Li, Yu Guo, Lei Huang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated histopathology and clinical outcome of autonomic nerve trauma and vessels removal within the cardinal ligament (CL) during nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) compared with radical hysterectomy (RH).
METHODS: 25 women with FIGO stage Ib1-IIa cervical cancer underwent RH (n=13) or NSRH (n=12). Removed CLs lengths were measured. Biopsies were collected from the proximal, middle and distal segment of CLs and fixed. Different markers were used for immunohistochemisty analysis: tyrosine hydroxylase for sympathetic nerves; vasoactive intestinal polypeptide for parasympathetic nerves; CD34 for blood vessels; and D2-40 for lymphatic vessels. The volume density (Vv), a parameter of biological stereology, was used to quantitatively measure CL components, while post-operative functions, such as defecation, micturition and two-year disease free survival in RH and NSRH groups were compared.
RESULTS: The nerves mainly existed in the middle and distal segments of CLs. The Vv was greater in RH compared with NSRH for both sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve markers (P<0.05), while the Vv of blood and lymphatic vessels were same in the two groups. Average time to achieve residual urine≤50ml and first defecation were shorter in NSRH than in RH (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Less autonomic nerves within CL are transected in NSRH than in RH, while blood/lymphatic vessels are efficiently removed in both treatments. Compared to RH, NSRH decreases iatrogenic injury, which leads to reduced post-operative co-morbidities, with ensure the same radicality. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22209773     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.12.448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  9 in total

Review 1.  Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Khadra Galaal; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-12

Review 2.  Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  The 3D reconstructions of female pelvic autonomic nerves and their related organs based on MRI: a first step towards neuronavigation during nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Pengfei Li; Ping Liu; Chunlin Chen; Hui Duan; Wenjun Qiao; Oldevie Hugueth Ognami
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Siwanon Rattanakanokchai; Khadra Galaal; Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-25

5.  Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ju Won Roh; Dong Ock Lee; Dong Hoon Suh; Myong Cheol Lim; Sang Soo Seo; Jinsoo Chung; Sun Lee; Sang Yoon Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hee Seung Kim; Keewon Kim; Seung Bum Ryoo; Joung Hwa Seo; Sang Youn Kim; Ji Won Park; Min A Kim; Kyoung Sup Hong; Chang Wook Jeong; Yong Sang Song
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Identification and injury to the inferior hypogastric plexus in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Lei Li; Yalan Bi; Leiming Wang; Xinxin Mao; Bernhard Kraemer; Jinghe Lang; Quancai Cui; Ming Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Total laparoscopic vs. conventional open abdominal nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: clinical, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes in 301 patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Marcello Ceccaroni; Giovanni Roviglione; Mario Malzoni; Francesco Cosentino; Emanuela Spagnolo; Roberto Clarizia; Paolo Casadio; Renato Seracchioli; Fabio Ghezzi; Daniele Mautone; Francesco Bruni; Stefano Uccella
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 9.  Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Long; De-Sheng Yao; Xin-Wei Pan; Ting-Yu Ou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.