Literature DB >> 22209648

Enteral feeding outcomes after chemoradiotherapy for oropharynx cancer: a role for a prophylactic gastrostomy?

Gillian F Williams1, Mark T W Teo, Mehmet Sen, Karen E Dyker, Catherine Coyle, Robin J D Prestwich.   

Abstract

To determine the outcomes of patients managed with different routes of enteral feeding during chemoradiotherapy for oropharynx cancer. The hospital and dietetic records of consecutive patients with oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma treated between January 2007 and June 2009 with concurrent chemoradiotherapy were reviewed retrospectively. One hundred and four patients were analysed. Seventy-one received a prophylactic gastrostomy, 21 were managed with a strategy of NG tube as required and 12 received a therapeutic gastrostomy. Patients with a prophylactic gastrostomy commenced enteral feeding a median of 24 days after commencing radiotherapy, compared with a median of 41 days (p<0.001) for the NG as required group. Comparing prophylactic gastrostomy, NG as required and therapeutic gastrostomy, median number of unplanned inpatient days were 6, 14 and 7, respectively (p<0.01 for prophylactic gastrostomy vs. NG as required). Mean percentage weight loss at the end of treatment (6.1% vs. 7.1% vs. 5.2%, respectively) and at 6 months post-radiotherapy (11.7%, 14.3% and 8.9%) were similar in all groups (p=0.23). There was no significant difference in type of diet post-radiotherapy between prophylactic gastrostomy and NG as required groups (p=0.22). Median duration of enteral feeding was 181, 64 and 644 days, respectively (p<0.01 for prophylactic gastrostomy vs. NG as required). Use of a prophylactic gastrostomy (p<0.01) and higher T stage (p<0.01) were associated with increased duration of enteral feeding on a multivariate analysis. These data reinforce concerns regarding the detrimental impact of prophylactic gastrostomy placement upon long-term enteral feed dependence.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22209648     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  13 in total

1.  Nutritional status and feeding-tube placement in patients with locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer included in an induction chemotherapy-based larynx preservation program.

Authors:  Alexandre Bozec; Karen Benezery; Emmanuel Chamorey; Marc Ettaiche; Clair Vandersteen; Olivier Dassonville; Gilles Poissonnet; Jean-Christophe Riss; Jean-Michel Hannoun-Lévi; Marie-Eve Chand; Axel Leysalle; Esma Saada; Anne Sudaka; Juliette Haudebourg; Christophe Hebert; Marie-Noelle Falewee; François Demard; José Santini; Frédéric Peyrade
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  The effect of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement on swallowing and swallow-related outcomes in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie M Shaw; Heather Flowers; Brian O'Sullivan; Andrew Hope; Louis W C Liu; Rosemary Martino
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Treatment-Interval Changes in Serum Levels of Albumin and Histidine Correlated with Treatment Interruption in Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Completing Chemoradiotherapy under Recommended Calorie and Protein Provision.

Authors:  Chao-Hung Wang; Hang Huong Ling; Min-Hui Liu; Yi-Ping Pan; Pei-Hung Chang; Yu-Ching Lin; Wen-Chi Chou; Chia-Lin Peng; Kun-Yun Yeh
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion in cancer patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hala Mansoor; Muhammad Adnan Masood; Muhammed Aasim Yusuf
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-12

Review 5.  Nutritional Support of Cancer Patients without Oral Feeding: How to Select the Most Effective Technique?

Authors:  Gonçalo Nunes; Jorge Fonseca; Ana Teresa Barata; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10-07

Review 6.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jinfeng Wang; Minjie Liu; Chao Liu; Yun Ye; Guanhong Huang
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 7.  Nutritional interventions in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy: a narrative review.

Authors:  Maurizio Bossola
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Comparative effects of different enteral feeding methods in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhihong Zhang; Yu Zhu; Yun Ling; Lijuan Zhang; Hongwei Wan
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Contemporary management of advanced laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher J Britt; Christine G Gourin
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-29

10.  [Palliative endoscopy].

Authors:  Benno Arnstadt; Hans-Dieter Allescher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.