Literature DB >> 22209563

Predicting doripenem susceptibility based on meropenem and imipenem interpretation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Mao Hagihara1, Joseph L Kuti, David P Nicolau.   

Abstract

Doripenem is not available on many automated susceptibility testing panels. We evaluated the surrogate predictive value (SPV) of meropenem and imipenem in predicting doripenem susceptibility using the different breakpoint definitions available globally. MIC data for 736 Pseudomonas aeruginosa were extracted, and categorical interpretations were performed using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) proposed 2012, European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) breakpoints. Regardless of the breakpoint applied, very major and major errors were observed in only 0.1-0.8% and 0.1-4.5% of isolates, respectively. Meropenem's SPV was 98.6% for CLSI 2012 breakpoints, 94.0% for EUCAST, and 95.0% for FDA. Imipenem's SPV was 98.6%, 90.9%, and 97.2%, respectively. These data indicate that meropenem and imipenem would be reliable surrogate markers of doripenem susceptibility when using CLSI 2012 and FDA breakpoints. Meropenem would be recommended over imipenem for EUCAST breakpoints. However, meropenem and imipenem nonsusceptible isolates should be directly tested against doripenem since the latter antibiotic may still retain susceptibility against these isolates.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22209563     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  4 in total

1.  MIC score, a new tool to compare bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics application to the comparison of susceptibility to different penems of clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Cédric Bretonnière; Adeline Maitte; Jocelyne Caillon; Gilles Potel; David Boutoille; Cédric Jacqueline; Christophe Guitton
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  In vitro Antibacterial Activity of Doripenem against Gram-Negative Blood Isolates in a Korean Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Seong-Ho Choi; Mi Young Ahn; Jin-Won Chung; Mi-Kyung Lee
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2015-09-30

3.  Clinical Experience of Patients Receiving Doripenem-Containing Regimens for the Treatment of Healthcare-Associated Infections.

Authors:  Chien-Ming Chao; Chi-Chung Chen; Hui-Ling Huang; Yin-Ching Chuang; Chih-Cheng Lai; Hung-Jen Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessment of Doripenem, Meropenem, and Imipenem against Respiratory Isolates of Pseudomonas aeroginosa in a Tertiary Care Hospital of North India.

Authors:  Arti Negi; Mridu Anand; Avinash Singh; Awadhesh Kumar; Chinmoy Sahu; Kashi Nath Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.