Literature DB >> 22209475

Gait training in human spinal cord injury using electromechanical systems: effect of device type and patient characteristics.

Jesús Benito-Penalva1, Dylan J Edwards, Eloy Opisso, Mar Cortes, Raquel Lopez-Blazquez, Narda Murillo, Ursula Costa, Jose M Tormos, Joan Vidal-Samsó, Josep Valls-Solé, Josep Medina.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical improvements in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients associated with intensive gait training using electromechanical systems according to patient characteristics.
DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study.
SETTING: Inpatient SCI rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with SCI (n=130). INTERVENTION: Patients received locomotor training with 2 different electromechanical devices, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lower-extremity motor score, Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury, and 10-meter walking test data were collected at the baseline, midpoint, and end of the program. Patients were stratified according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) category, time since injury, and injury etiology. A subgroup of traumatic ASIA grade C and D patients were compared with data obtained from the European Multicenter Study about Human Spinal Cord Injury (EM-SCI).
RESULTS: One hundred and five patients completed the program. Significant gains in lower-limb motor function and gait were observed for both types of electromechanical device systems, to a similar degree. The greatest rate of improvement was shown in the motor incomplete SCI patients, and for patients <6 months postinjury. The positive response associated with training was not affected by injury etiology, age, sex, or lesion level. The trajectory of improvement was significantly enhanced relative to patients receiving the conventional standard of care without electromechanical systems (EM-SCI).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of electromechanical systems for intensive gait training in SCI is associated with a marked improvement in lower-limb motor function and gait across a diverse range of patients and is most evident in motor incomplete patients, and for patients who begin the regimen early in the recovery process.
Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22209475     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  19 in total

1.  The effects of robot assisted gait training on temporal-spatial characteristics of people with spinal cord injuries: A systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen Clive Hayes; Christopher Richard James Wilcox; Hollie Samantha Forbes White; Natalie Vanicek
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Dose-Response Outcomes Associated with Different Forms of Locomotor Training in Persons with Chronic Motor-Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Evan B Sandler; Kathryn E Roach; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Locomotor Treadmill Training Promotes Soleus Trophism by Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway in Paraplegic Rats.

Authors:  Caroline Cunha do Espírito Santo; Daniela Dal Secco; Anamaria Meireles; Gabriel Ribeiro de Freitas; Franciane Bobinski; Mauricio Peña Cunha; Ana Lúcia Severo Rodrigues; Alessandra Swarowsky; Adair Roberto Soares Santos; Jocemar Ilha
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Should body weight-supported treadmill training and robotic-assistive steppers for locomotor training trot back to the starting gate?

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 5.  Training to achieve over ground walking after spinal cord injury: a review of who, what, when, and how.

Authors:  Jaynie F Yang; Kristin E Musselman
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Modular control of gait after incomplete spinal cord injury: differences between sides.

Authors:  S Pérez-Nombela; F Barroso; D Torricelli; A de Los Reyes-Guzmán; A J Del-Ama; J Gómez-Soriano; J L Pons; Á Gil-Agudo
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Robotic Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study on End-Effectors and Neurophysiological Outcomes.

Authors:  Rocco Salvatore Calabrò; Serena Filoni; Luana Billeri; Tina Balletta; Antonino Cannavò; Angela Militi; Demetrio Milardi; Loris Pignolo; Antonino Naro
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  The effects of lower extremity deep sensory impairments on walking capability in patients with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Tomoki Naka; Tetsuo Hayashi; Atsushi Sugyo; Ryouichi Watanabe; Fumihiro Towatari; Takeshi Maeda
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Effect of robotic-assisted gait training in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ji Cheol Shin; Ji Yong Kim; Han Kyul Park; Na Young Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2014-12-24

10.  The effect of impedance-controlled robotic gait training on walking ability and quality in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: an explorative study.

Authors:  Bertine M Fleerkotte; Bram Koopman; Jaap H Buurke; Edwin H F van Asseldonk; Herman van der Kooij; Johan S Rietman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.