Literature DB >> 22209448

Recent advances in reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Indran Balasundaram1, Ihsaan Al-Hadad, Sat Parmar.   

Abstract

Reconstruction within the head and neck is challenging. Defects can be anatomically complex and may already be compromised by scarring, inflammation, and infection. Tissue grafts and vascularised flaps (either pedicled or free) bring healthy tissue to a compromised wound for optimal healing and are the current gold standard for the repair of such defects, but disadvantages are their limited availability, the difficulty of shaping the flap to fit the defect and, most importantly, donor site morbidity. The importance of function and aesthetics has driven advances in the accuracy of surgical techniques. We discuss current advances in reconstruction within oral and maxillofacial surgery. Developments in navigation, three-dimensional imaging, stereolithographic models, and the use of custom-made implants can aid and improve the accuracy of existing reconstructive methods. Robotic surgery, which does not modify existing techniques of reconstruction, allows access, resection of tumours, and reconstruction with conventional free flap techniques in the oropharynx without the need for mandibulotomy. Tissue engineering and distraction osteogenesis avoid the need for autologous tissue transfer and can therefore be seen as more conservative methods of reconstruction. Recently, facial allotransplantation has allowed whole anatomical facial units to be replaced with the possibility of sensory recovery and reanimation being completed in a single procedure. However, patients who have facial allotransplants are subject to life-long immunosuppression so this method of reconstruction should be limited to selected cases.
Copyright © 2011 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22209448     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  6 in total

1.  Intraoperative frozen section histological analysis of resection samples is useful for the control of primary lesions in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Akihiko Miyawaki; Hiroshi Hijioka; Takayuki Ishida; Etsuro Nozoe; Norifumi Nakamura; Ryoichi Oya
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-04

2.  What Surgical Education the Speciality Offers? Perception of Role of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery by 1200 Healthcare Professionals, Students and the General Public in Hyderabad, India.

Authors:  Ashwant Kumar Vadepally; Ramen Sinha
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-10-09

3.  An analysis of approach toward oral and maxillofacial surgery: A survey of 1800 health-care specialists, students, and general people in Odisha, India.

Authors:  Rajat Mohanty; Vaibhav Singh
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019 Jan-Jun

4.  Development and Characterization of a Rabbit Model of Compromised Maxillofacial Wound Healing.

Authors:  Stacey L Piotrowski; Lindsay Wilson; Neeraja Dharmaraj; Amani Hamze; Ashley Clark; Ramesh Tailor; Lori R Hill; Stephen Lai; F Kurtis Kasper; Simon Young
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.056

5.  Technical procedures for template-guided surgery for mandibular reconstruction based on digital design and manufacturing.

Authors:  Yun-feng Liu; Liang-wei Xu; Hui-yong Zhu; Sean Shih-Yao Liu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Evaluation of the Proximal Tibia as a Donor Site of Cancellous Bone for Intraoral Grafting Procedures-A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Piotr Malara; Nadine von Krockow; Iwona Niedzielska; Beata Malara
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.