Literature DB >> 22209432

"Hot cross bun" sign in multiple system atrophy with predominant cerebellar ataxia: a comparison between proton density-weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging.

Seiko Kasahara1, Yukio Miki, Mitsunori Kanagaki, Takayuki Kondo, Akira Yamamoto, Emiko Morimoto, Tomohisa Okada, Hidefumi Ito, Ryosuke Takahashi, Kaori Togashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether proton density-weighted imaging can detect the "hot cross bun" sign in the pons in multiple system atrophy with predominant cerebellar ataxia significantly better than T2-weighted imaging at 3T.
METHODS: Sixteen consecutive patients with multiple system atrophy with predominant cerebellar ataxia according to the Consensus Criteria were reviewed. Axial unenhanced proton density-weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging were obtained using a dual-echo fast spin-echo sequence at 3T. Two neuroradiologists independently evaluated visualisation of the abnormal pontine signal using a 4-point visual grade from Grade 0 (no "hot cross bun" sign) to Grade 3 (prominent "hot cross bun" sign on two or more sequential slices). Differences in grade between proton density-weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging were statistically analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
RESULTS: In 11 patients (69%), a higher grade was given for proton density-weighted imaging than T2-weighted imaging. In 1 patient (6%), grades were the same (Grade 3) on both images. In the remaining 4 patients (25%), signal abnormalities were not detected on either image (Grade 0). The "hot cross bun" sign was thus observed significantly better on proton density-weighted imaging than on T2-weighted imaging (P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The "hot cross bun" sign considered diagnostic for multiple system atrophy with predominant cerebellar ataxia is significantly better visualised on proton density-weighted imaging than on T2-weighted imaging at 3T.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22209432     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  12 in total

Review 1.  Beyond the midbrain atrophy: wide spectrum of structural MRI finding in cases of pathologically proven progressive supranuclear palsy.

Authors:  Keita Sakurai; Aya M Tokumaru; Keigo Shimoji; Shigeo Murayama; Kazutomi Kanemaru; Satoru Morimoto; Ikuko Aiba; Motoo Nakagawa; Yoshiyuki Ozawa; Masashi Shimohira; Noriyuki Matsukawa; Yoshio Hashizume; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Neuroimaging in Dementia.

Authors:  Adam M Staffaroni; Fanny M Elahi; Dana McDermott; Kacey Marton; Elissaios Karageorgiou; Simone Sacco; Matteo Paoletti; Eduardo Caverzasi; Christopher P Hess; Howard J Rosen; Michael D Geschwind
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.420

3.  The Diagnosis and Natural History of Multiple System Atrophy, Cerebellar Type.

Authors:  David J Lin; Katherine L Hermann; Jeremy D Schmahmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 4.  Dilemma of multiple system atrophy and spinocerebellar ataxias.

Authors:  Ming Li; Qianqian Ma; Xing Zhao; Can Wang; Huijie Wu; Jinyao Li; Wei Yang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Brain MRI of multiple system atrophy of cerebellar type: a prospective study with implications for diagnosis criteria.

Authors:  G Carré; J L Dietemann; O Gebus; S Montaut; O Lagha-Boukbiza; T Wirth; S Kremer; I J Namer; M Anheim; C Tranchant
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Radiological hints for differentiation of cerebellar multiple system atrophy from spinocerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Jiing-Feng Lirng; Bing-Wen Soong; Hung-Chieh Chen; Li-Hua Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  Multiple system atrophy: pathogenic mechanisms and biomarkers.

Authors:  Kurt A Jellinger; Gregor K Wenning
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Comparison of MRI and 123I-FP-CIT SPECT for the evaluation of MSA-P clinical severity.

Authors:  Miki Nishimori; Yoriko Murata; Hitomi Iwasa; Kana Miyatake; Michiko Tadokoro; Shino Kohsaki; Munenobu Nogami; Norihiko Hamada; Hitoshi Ninomiya; Yasushi Osaki; Hirokazu Furuya; Takuji Yamagami
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2018-04-11

9.  An update on the cerebellar subtype of multiple system atrophy.

Authors:  Ludovico Ciolli; Florian Krismer; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Gregor K Wenning
Journal:  Cerebellum Ataxias       Date:  2014-10-10

10.  Early strong intrathecal inflammation in cerebellar type multiple system atrophy by cerebrospinal fluid cytokine/chemokine profiles: a case control study.

Authors:  Ryo Yamasaki; Hiroo Yamaguchi; Takuya Matsushita; Takayuki Fujii; Akio Hiwatashi; Jun-Ichi Kira
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 8.322

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.