BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BPD) research has identified a number of neurocognitive deficits as potential vulnerability markers; however, very few studies have focused on patterns of performance on affective processing tasks (e.g. affective Go/No-Go tasks) which may be more closely tied to the pathophysiology of the illness. We previously reported that stable BPD patients demonstrate a response bias toward negative affective stimuli as compared with healthy controls and schizophrenia patients. The goal of the current study was to expand upon these prior findings to investigate these patterns in the unaffected siblings of BPD patients. METHODS: An affective Go/No-Go test was used to evaluate inhibitory response to negatively-valenced, positively-valenced, and neutral stimuli in 20 unaffected siblings of bipolar I patients versus 20 healthy controls. Accuracy (d') and response bias (beta) served as dependent variables in a series of repeated measures ANCOVAs. RESULTS: We found a non-significant main effect for group when comparing accuracy performance (d') on the affective Go/No-Go of unaffected siblings versus healthy controls. However, very similar to the pattern that we previously reported in stable BPD patients, unaffected siblings showed a response bias (beta) toward negatively-valenced stimuli versus healthy controls [F=3.81; p=0.03]. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: The current results extend our recent work which suggested that stable bipolar patients attend more readily to negative target stimuli than do schizophrenic or healthy subjects. These data, indicating that unaffected siblings also demonstrate an affective processing bias, implicate this task as a potential endophenotype in BPD.
BACKGROUND:Bipolar disorder (BPD) research has identified a number of neurocognitive deficits as potential vulnerability markers; however, very few studies have focused on patterns of performance on affective processing tasks (e.g. affective Go/No-Go tasks) which may be more closely tied to the pathophysiology of the illness. We previously reported that stable BPD patients demonstrate a response bias toward negative affective stimuli as compared with healthy controls and schizophreniapatients. The goal of the current study was to expand upon these prior findings to investigate these patterns in the unaffected siblings of BPD patients. METHODS: An affective Go/No-Go test was used to evaluate inhibitory response to negatively-valenced, positively-valenced, and neutral stimuli in 20 unaffected siblings of bipolar Ipatients versus 20 healthy controls. Accuracy (d') and response bias (beta) served as dependent variables in a series of repeated measures ANCOVAs. RESULTS: We found a non-significant main effect for group when comparing accuracy performance (d') on the affective Go/No-Go of unaffected siblings versus healthy controls. However, very similar to the pattern that we previously reported in stable BPD patients, unaffected siblings showed a response bias (beta) toward negatively-valenced stimuli versus healthy controls [F=3.81; p=0.03]. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: The current results extend our recent work which suggested that stable bipolarpatients attend more readily to negative target stimuli than do schizophrenic or healthy subjects. These data, indicating that unaffected siblings also demonstrate an affective processing bias, implicate this task as a potential endophenotype in BPD.
Authors: Heidi W Thermenos; Jill M Goldstein; Snezana M Milanovic; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Nikos Makris; Peter Laviolette; Jennifer K Koch; Stephen V Faraone; Ming T Tsuang; Stephen L Buka; Larry J Seidman Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Amanda E Guyer; Erin B McClure; Abby D Adler; Melissa A Brotman; Brendan A Rich; Alane S Kimes; Daniel S Pine; Monique Ernst; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Tiziana Zalla; Cécile Joyce; Andrei Szöke; Franck Schürhoff; Bernard Pillon; Odile Komano; Fernando Perez-Diaz; Frank Bellivier; Caroline Alter; Bruno Dubois; Frédéric Rouillon; Olivier Houde; Marion Leboyer Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Colm McDonald; Edward T Bullmore; Pak C Sham; Xavier Chitnis; Harvey Wickham; Elvira Bramon; Robin M Murray Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2004-10
Authors: Isabelle E Bauer; Thomas W Frazier; Thomas D Meyer; Eric Youngstrom; Giovana B Zunta-Soares; Jair C Soares Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 2.576