PURPOSE: Patients treated for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiation therapy (RT) at our center from 1976 to 1990 had a 15% actuarial 10-year local recurrence (LR) rate. Since then, improved mammographic and pathologic evaluation and greater attention to achieving negative margins may have resulted in a lower risk of LR. In addition, clinical implications of hormone receptor and HER-2 status in DCIS remain unclear. We sought to determine the following: LR rates with this more modern approach; the relation between LR and HER-2 status; and clinical and pathologic factors associated with HER-2(+) DCIS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We studied 246 consecutive patients who underwent BCS and RT for DCIS from 2001 to 2007. Of the patients, 96 (39%) were Grade III and the median number of involved tissue blocks was 3. Half underwent re-excision and 222 (90%) had negative margins (>2 mm). All received whole-breast RT (40-52 Gy) and 99% (244) received a tumor bed boost (8-18 Gy). Routine estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER-2 immunohistochemistry was instituted in 2003. RESULTS: With median follow-up of 58 months, there were no LRs. Seven patients (3%) developed contralateral breast cancer (4 invasive and 3 in situ). Among 163 patients with immunohistochemistry, 124 were ER/PR(+)HER-2(-), 27 were ER/PR(+)HER-2(+), 6 were ER(-)/PR(-)HER-2(+), and 6 were ER(-)/PR(-)HER-2(-). On univariable analysis, HER-2(+)was significantly associated with Grade III, ER(-)/PR(-), central necrosis, comedo subtype, more extensive DCIS, and postmenopausal status. On multivariable analysis, Grade III and postmenopausal status remained significantly associated with HER-2(+). CONCLUSIONS: In an era of mammographically identified DCIS, larger excisions, widely negative margins and the use of a tumor bed boost, we observed no LR regardless of ER/PR/HER-2 status. Factors associated with HER-2(+)DCIS included more extensive DCIS, Grade III, ER(-)/PR(-), central necrosis, comedo subtype, and postmenopausal status. Further follow-up and additional studies are required to confirm these results. Copyright Â
PURPOSE:Patients treated for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiation therapy (RT) at our center from 1976 to 1990 had a 15% actuarial 10-year local recurrence (LR) rate. Since then, improved mammographic and pathologic evaluation and greater attention to achieving negative margins may have resulted in a lower risk of LR. In addition, clinical implications of hormone receptor and HER-2 status in DCIS remain unclear. We sought to determine the following: LR rates with this more modern approach; the relation between LR and HER-2 status; and clinical and pathologic factors associated with HER-2(+) DCIS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We studied 246 consecutive patients who underwent BCS and RT for DCIS from 2001 to 2007. Of the patients, 96 (39%) were Grade III and the median number of involved tissue blocks was 3. Half underwent re-excision and 222 (90%) had negative margins (>2 mm). All received whole-breast RT (40-52 Gy) and 99% (244) received a tumor bed boost (8-18 Gy). Routine estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER-2 immunohistochemistry was instituted in 2003. RESULTS: With median follow-up of 58 months, there were no LRs. Seven patients (3%) developed contralateral breast cancer (4 invasive and 3 in situ). Among 163 patients with immunohistochemistry, 124 were ER/PR(+)HER-2(-), 27 were ER/PR(+)HER-2(+), 6 were ER(-)/PR(-)HER-2(+), and 6 were ER(-)/PR(-)HER-2(-). On univariable analysis, HER-2(+)was significantly associated with Grade III, ER(-)/PR(-), central necrosis, comedo subtype, more extensive DCIS, and postmenopausal status. On multivariable analysis, Grade III and postmenopausal status remained significantly associated with HER-2(+). CONCLUSIONS: In an era of mammographically identified DCIS, larger excisions, widely negative margins and the use of a tumor bed boost, we observed no LR regardless of ER/PR/HER-2 status. Factors associated with HER-2(+)DCIS included more extensive DCIS, Grade III, ER(-)/PR(-), central necrosis, comedo subtype, and postmenopausal status. Further follow-up and additional studies are required to confirm these results. Copyright Â
Authors: Marc D Ryser; Mathias Worni; Elizabeth L Turner; Jeffrey R Marks; Rick Durrett; E Shelley Hwang Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Chirag Shah; Frank A Vicini; Sameer Berry; Thomas B Julian; John Ben Wilkinson; Simona F Shaitelman; Atif Khan; Steven E Finkelstein; Neal Goldstein Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Djøra I Soeteman; Natasha K Stout; Elissa M Ozanne; Caprice Greenberg; Michael J Hassett; Deborah Schrag; Rinaa S Punglia Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: R Souchon; M-L Sautter-Bihl; F Sedlmayer; W Budach; J Dunst; P Feyer; R Fietkau; W Haase; W Harms; F Wenz; R Sauer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Justin Romanoff; Seema A Khan; Ruth Carlos; Lawrence J Solin; Sunil Badve; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Ralph L Corsetti; Habib Rahbar; Derrick W Spell; Kenneth B Blankstein; Linda K Han; Jennifer L Sabol; John R Bumberry; Ilana Gareen; Bradley S Snyder; Lynne I Wagner; Kathy D Miller; Joseph A Sparano; Christopher Comstock Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Mauro G Mastropasqua; Francesca Addante; Sara Pirola; Giuseppe Ingravallo; Giuseppe Viale Journal: Breast Date: 2020-10-17 Impact factor: 4.380