Literature DB >> 22208803

Test order of quantitative sensory testing facilitates mechanical hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers.

Eva Gröne1, Alexander Crispin, Johannes Fleckenstein, Dominik Irnich, Rolf-Detlef Treede, Philip M Lang.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) has become a widely used method to evaluate different submodalities of the somatic sensory system (predominantly) in patients with neuropathic pain. QST consists of 7 tests measuring 13 parameters in order to assess and quantify the perception of temperature, touch, pain, pressure, and vibration. The German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain implemented a standardized QST protocol including a defined testing order of the measurements. Accordingly, subjects tested with QST undergo thermal before mechanical testing. In the present study, we investigated the effect of testing order on the results of QST. Twenty healthy subjects were tested twice, 1 week apart with 2 different QST testing orders: the standardized testing order according to the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain and a modified testing order in which mechanical stimuli were applied before thermal stimuli. For the test protocol that began with thermal testing, subjects exhibited signs of an increased mechanical perception: The mechanical pain sensitivity was significantly increased (P = .001, Wilcoxon test) for each pinprick stimulator and the mechanical pain threshold was lowered by a factor of 2 when compared with the modified testing order in which mechanical parameters were tested at the beginning of the session without prior thermal stimulation. Thermal parameters were the same for both test-order paradigms. These data indicate that preceding mild thermal stimulation might lead to a sensitization to mechanical stimuli and thus to mechanical hyperalgesia. Alternative habituation mechanisms in the modified testing order resulting from repeated pinprick stimulation at the beginning should also be debated. QST is a helpful diagnostic tool but interpretation should be done with consideration of interaction between test parameters. Reference data are only valid in the testing order from which they are obtained. PERSPECTIVE: Present data showed that mechanical hyperalgesia followed thermal testing. This article demonstrates that the test order of quantitative sensory testing is relevant in interpreting the results obtained. Reference values are suitable in the test order from which they are obtained.
Copyright © 2012 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22208803     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  13 in total

1.  Quantitative Sensory Testing in adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Odette Fründt; Wiebke Grashorn; Daniel Schöttle; Ina Peiker; Nicole David; Andreas K Engel; Katarina Forkmann; Nathalie Wrobel; Alexander Münchau; Ulrike Bingel
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-04

2.  Investigating the effects of mobilization with movement and exercise on pain modulation processes in shoulder pain - a single cohort pilot study with short-term follow up.

Authors:  Melina N Haik; Kerrie Evans; Ashley Smith; Leanne Bisset
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2022-02-10

3.  NerveCheck: An inexpensive quantitative sensory testing device for patients with diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  G Ponirakis; M N Odriozola; S Odriozola; I N Petropoulos; S Azmi; H Fadavi; U Alam; O Asghar; A Marshall; A Miro; A Kheyami; A Al-Ahmar; M B Odriozola; A Odriozola; R A Malik
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.602

4.  Increased Experimental Pain Sensitivity in Chronic Pain Patients Who Developed Opioid Use Disorder.

Authors:  Peggy A Compton; Thomas E Wasser; Martin D Cheatle
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.423

5.  Somatosensory function in patients with secondary adrenal insufficiency treated with two different doses of hydrocortisone-Results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jorien Werumeus Buning; Karl-Heinz Konopka; Pauline Brummelman; Janneke Koerts; Robin P F Dullaart; Gerrit van den Berg; Melanie M van der Klauw; Oliver Tucha; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; André P van Beek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  "Lacking warmth": Alexithymia trait is related to warm-specific thermal somatosensory processing.

Authors:  Khatereh Borhani; Elisabetta Làdavas; Aikaterini Fotopoulou; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Sub-maximal endurance exercise does not mediate alterations of somatosensory thresholds.

Authors:  Ann-Christin Kortenjann; Winfried Banzer; Johannes Fleckenstein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Sedentary behaviour facilitates conditioned pain modulation in middle-aged and older adults with persistent musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional investigation.

Authors:  Ramakrishnan Mani; Divya Bharatkumar Adhia; Sook Ling Leong; Sven Vanneste; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-08-02

9.  Pain sensitisation and the risk of poor outcome following physiotherapy for patients with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Helen O'Leary; Keith M Smart; Niamh A Moloney; Catherine Blake; Catherine M Doody
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients.

Authors:  Kevin J Duffy; Katharyn L Flickinger; Jeffrey T Kristan; Melissa J Repine; Alexandro Gianforcaro; Rebecca B Hasley; Saad Feroz; Jessica M Rupp; Jumana Al-Baghli; Maria L Pacella; Brian P Suffoletto; Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.