Literature DB >> 22208402

Application of a weights-of-evidence method and GIS to regional groundwater productivity potential mapping.

Saro Lee1, Yong-Sung Kim, Hyun-Joo Oh.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship among groundwater productivity data including specific capacity (SPC) and transmissivity (T) as well as its related hydrogeological factors in a bedrock aquifer, and subsequently, to produce the regional groundwater productivity potential (GPP) map for the area around Pohang City, Korea using a geographic information system (GIS) and a weights-of-evidence (WOE) model. All of the related factors, including topography, lineament, geology, forest, and soil data were collected and input into a spatial database. In addition, SPC and T data were collected from 83 and 81 well locations, respectively. Four dependent variables including SPC values of ≥6.25 m3/d/m (Case 1) and T values of ≥3.79 m2/d (Case 3) corresponding to a yield (Y) of ≥500 m3/d, and SPC values of ≥3.75 m3/d/m (Case 2) and T values of ≥2.61 m2/d (Case 4) corresponding to a Y of ≥300 m3/d were also input into a spatial database. The SPC and T data were randomly selected in an approximately 70:30 ratio to train and validate the WOE model. Tests of conditional independence were performed for the used factors. To assess the regional GPP for each dependent variable, W+ and W- of each factor's rating were overlaid spatially. The results of the analysis were validated using area under curve (AUC) analysis with the existing SPC and T data that were not used for the training of the model. The AUC of Cases 1, 2, 3 and 4 showed 0.7120, 0.6893, 0.6920, and 0.7098, respectively. In the case of the dependent variables, Case 1 had an accuracy of 71.20% (AUC: 0.7120), which is the best result produced in this analysis. Such information and the maps generated from it could be used for groundwater management, a practice related to groundwater resource exploration.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22208402     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  6 in total

1.  A comparison between index of entropy and catastrophe theory methods for mapping groundwater potential in an arid region.

Authors:  Alaa M Al-Abadi; Shamsuddin Shahid
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Application of a GIS-/remote sensing-based approach for predicting groundwater potential zones using a multi-criteria data mining methodology.

Authors:  Kehinde Anthony Mogaji; Hwee San Lim
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Prediction of groundwater flowing well zone at An-Najif Province, central Iraq using evidential belief functions model and GIS.

Authors:  Alaa M Al-Abadi; Biswajeet Pradhan; Shamsuddin Shahid
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Groundwater potential mapping using C5.0, random forest, and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in GIS.

Authors:  Ali Golkarian; Seyed Amir Naghibi; Bahareh Kalantar; Biswajeet Pradhan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  GIS and AHP Techniques Based Delineation of Groundwater Potential Zones: a case study from Southern Western Ghats, India.

Authors:  P Arulbalaji; D Padmalal; K Sreelash
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Assessing sustainable development prospects through remote sensing: A review.

Authors:  Ram Avtar; Akinola Adesuji Komolafe; Asma Kouser; Deepak Singh; Ali P Yunus; Jie Dou; Pankaj Kumar; Rajarshi Das Gupta; Brian Alan Johnson; Huynh Vuong Thu Minh; Ashwani Kumar Aggarwal; Tonni Agustiono Kurniawan
Journal:  Remote Sens Appl       Date:  2020-09-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.