Literature DB >> 22207592

The influence of neighborhood socioeconomic status and walkability on TV viewing time.

Patricia F Coogan1, Laura F White, Stephen R Evans, Julie R Palmer, Lynn Rosenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Influences on TV viewing time, which is associated with adverse health outcomes such as obesity and diabetes, need clarification. We assessed the relation of neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and walkability with TV viewing time in the Black Women's Health Study, a prospective study of African American women.
METHODS: We created neighborhood SES and walkability scores using data from the U.S. census and other sources. We estimated odds ratios for TV viewing 5+ hours/day compared with 0-1 hours/day for quintiles of neighborhood SES and walkability scores.
RESULTS: Neighborhood SES was inversely associated with TV viewing time. The odds ratio for watching 5+ hours/day in the highest compared with the lowest quintile of neighborhood SES was 0.66 (95% CI 0.54-0.81). Neighborhood walkability was not associated with TV viewing time.
CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood SES should be considered in devising strategies to combat the high levels of sedentariness prevalent in African American women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22207592      PMCID: PMC3786398          DOI: 10.1123/jpah.9.8.1074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  30 in total

1.  A structural model of health behavior: a pragmatic approach to explain and influence health behaviors at the population level.

Authors:  D A Cohen; R A Scribner; T A Farley
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Physical activity in aging: changes in patterns and their relationship to health and function.

Authors:  L DiPietro
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a population-based study of barriers, enjoyment, and preference.

Authors:  Jo Salmon; Neville Owen; David Crawford; Adrian Bauman; James F Sallis
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Television viewing and other screen-based entertainment in relation to multiple socioeconomic status indicators and area deprivation: the Scottish Health Survey 2003.

Authors:  E Stamatakis; M Hillsdon; G Mishra; M Hamer; M Marmot
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  The role of lifestyle in health: the epidemiology and consequences of inactivity.

Authors:  W H Dietz
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.297

Review 6.  Health psychology: what is an unhealthy environment and how does it get under the skin?

Authors:  S E Taylor; R L Repetti; T Seeman
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women.

Authors:  Frank B Hu; Tricia Y Li; Graham A Colditz; Walter C Willett; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars.

Authors:  Lawrence D Frank; Martin A Andresen; Thomas L Schmid
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Neighborhoods and obesity in later life.

Authors:  Irina B Grafova; Vicki A Freedman; Rizie Kumar; Jeannette Rogowski
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Television time and continuous metabolic risk in physically active adults.

Authors:  Genevieve N Healy; David W Dunstan; Jo Salmon; Jonathan E Shaw; Paul Z Zimmet; Neville Owen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  7 in total

1.  Promoting physical activity in high-poverty neighborhood parks: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Deborah A Cohen; Bing Han; Kathryn P Derose; Stephanie Williamson; Terry Marsh; Laura Raaen; Thomas L McKenzie
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Rapid cycle adaptation of a classroom-based intervention to promote equity in access to youth physical activity.

Authors:  Rebecca E Hasson; Andria B Eisman; Amy Wassmann; Scott Martin; Pamela Pugh; Kerry Winkelseth; Ronald Zernicke; Lisa Rabaut
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.626

3.  Categorisation of built environment characteristics: the trouble with tertiles.

Authors:  Karen E Lamb; Simon R White
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Cross-sectional and prospective associations of neighbourhood environmental attributes with screen time in Japanese middle-aged and older adults.

Authors:  Yung Liao; Ai Shibata; Kaori Ishii; Mohammad Javad Koohsari; Koichiro Oka
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Sensor-based physical activity, sedentary time, and reported cell phone screen time: A hierarchy of correlates in youth.

Authors:  Pedro B Júdice; João P Magalhães; Gil B Rosa; Duarte Henriques-Neto; Megan Hetherington-Rauth; Luís B Sardinha
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 7.179

Review 6.  A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18-65 years: a socio-ecological approach.

Authors:  Grainne O'Donoghue; Camille Perchoux; Keitly Mensah; Jeroen Lakerveld; Hidde van der Ploeg; Claire Bernaards; Sebastien F M Chastin; Chantal Simon; Donal O'Gorman; Julie-Anne Nazare
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Neighborhood Walkability Is Not Associated with Adults' Sedentary Behavior in the Residential Setting: Evidence from Breda, The Netherlands.

Authors:  Menno Luijkx; Marco Helbich
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.