Literature DB >> 22206983

Using outreach to involve the hard-to-reach in a health check: what difference does it make?

A Sinclair1, H A Alexander.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Mortality from coronary heart disease remains higher in Scotland than the European average. Primary prevention programmes, such as Keep Well, aim to tackle the associated risk factors within deprived communities. In Lanarkshire, the problem of non-attendance amongst 'hard-to-reach' groups was addressed by an outreach team, but there was a need to understand the methods employed to achieve health screening attendance. STUDY
DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with a typical sample of those who initially failed to attend for health screening but were subsequently appointed after outreach intervention.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews (n = 30) were conducted following clinic attendance. Transcripts were subjected to a form of content analysis and concepts were arranged into themes.
RESULTS: The group often referred to as 'hard-to-reach' are more accurately defined as either 'hard-to-contact' or 'hard-to-engage'. Non-attenders reported that outreach staff were effective in engaging them partly because of their personalities, but also because some of the contacts occurred at an opportune time.
CONCLUSIONS: Not all non-attenders for screening appointments are negatively disposed towards health screening, and defining them all as 'hard-to-reach' does them a disservice. The majority appeared to need outreach staff to convert them into attenders, but the costs of this need to be balanced against the benefits realized.
Copyright © 2011 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22206983     DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  12 in total

1.  A qualitative investigation of non-response in NHS health checks.

Authors:  Naomi Ellis; Christopher Gidlow; Lisa Cowap; Jason Randall; Zafar Iqbal; Jagdish Kumar
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2015-03-30

2.  Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake.

Authors:  Christopher Gidlow; Naomi Ellis; Jason Randall; Lisa Cowap; Graham Smith; Zafar Iqbal; Jagdish Kumar
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  Determinants for cardiovascular disease health check questionnaire: A validation study.

Authors:  Ai Theng Cheong; Karuthan Chinna; Ee Ming Khoo; Su May Liew
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of community provision of a preventive cardiovascular programme - the National Health Service Health Check in reaching the under-served groups by primary care in England: cross sectional observational study.

Authors:  Maria Woringer; Elizabeth Cecil; Hillary Watt; Kiara Chang; Fozia Hamid; Kamlesh Khunti; Elizabeth Dubois; Julie Evason; Azeem Majeed; Michael Soljak
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Men's Perspectives of a Gender-Sensitized Health Promotion Program Targeting Healthy Eating, Active Living, and Social Connectedness.

Authors:  Paul Sharp; Joan L Bottorff; Kate Hunt; John L Oliffe; Steven T Johnson; Lauren Dudley; Cristina M Caperchione
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2018-09-20

6.  The effectiveness of an enhanced invitation letter on uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic quasi-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Anna Sallis; Amanda Bunten; Annabelle Bonus; Andrew James; Tim Chadborn; Daniel Berry
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Peer Positive Social Control and Men's Health-Promoting Behaviors.

Authors:  Janie Houle; Sophie Meunier; Simon Coulombe; Coralie Mercerat; Isabelle Gaboury; Gilles Tremblay; Francine de Montigny; Lyne Cloutier; Bernard Roy; Nathalie Auger; Brigitte Lavoie
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2017-07-02

8.  The HAT TRICK programme for improving physical activity, healthy eating and connectedness among overweight, inactive men: study protocol of a pragmatic feasibility trial.

Authors:  Cristina M Caperchione; Joan L Bottorff; John L Oliffe; Steven T Johnson; Kate Hunt; Paul Sharp; Kayla M Fitzpatrick; Ryley Price; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program.

Authors:  Zahra Aziz; Michaela A Riddell; Pilvikki Absetz; Margaret Brand; Brian Oldenburg
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Social Relations, Community Engagement and Potentials: A Qualitative Study Exploring Resident Engagement in a Community-Based Health Promotion Intervention in a Deprived Social Housing Area.

Authors:  Abirami Srivarathan; Rikke Lund; Ulla Christensen; Maria Kristiansen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.