BACKGROUND: Studies incorporating direct comparisons across all phases of bipolar (BP) disorder are needed to elucidate the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. However, functional neuroimaging studies that differentiate bipolar mood states from each other and from healthy subjects are few and have yielded inconsistent findings. METHODS: One hundred five unmedicated adults were recruited: 30 with current bipolar depression (BPD), 30 with current bipolar hypomania or mania (BPM), 15 bipolar euthymic (BPE), and 30 healthy control subjects (HC). All subjects were diagnosed with DSM-IV BP (type I or II) using a structured clinical interview. Groups were age- and gender-ratio matched. In 3T functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments, subjects completed a negative facial emotion matching task. RESULTS: Bipolar euthymic and BPD groups exhibited increased amygdala activation compared with HCs in response to the negative faces; however, in the BPM group, this increase was not seen. Conversely, both BPE and BPM groups had increased activation in the insula relative to HCs, but in the BPD group, this effect was not seen. All three BP groups exhibited increased activation of the putamen compared with HCs. In the cortical areas, the BPM group exhibited decreased left lateral orbitofrontal cortex activation compared with both BPEs and HCs, increased dorsal anterior cingulate cortex activation compared with the BPD group, and increased dorsolateral prefrontal cortical activation compared with all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both state- and trait-related abnormalities in corticolimbic activation were seen in response to the negative facial emotion processing in a large sample of unmedicated adults across BP mood states. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: Studies incorporating direct comparisons across all phases of bipolar (BP) disorder are needed to elucidate the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. However, functional neuroimaging studies that differentiate bipolar mood states from each other and from healthy subjects are few and have yielded inconsistent findings. METHODS: One hundred five unmedicated adults were recruited: 30 with current bipolar depression (BPD), 30 with current bipolar hypomania or mania (BPM), 15 bipolar euthymic (BPE), and 30 healthy control subjects (HC). All subjects were diagnosed with DSM-IV BP (type I or II) using a structured clinical interview. Groups were age- and gender-ratio matched. In 3T functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments, subjects completed a negative facial emotion matching task. RESULTS: Bipolar euthymic and BPD groups exhibited increased amygdala activation compared with HCs in response to the negative faces; however, in the BPM group, this increase was not seen. Conversely, both BPE and BPM groups had increased activation in the insula relative to HCs, but in the BPD group, this effect was not seen. All three BP groups exhibited increased activation of the putamen compared with HCs. In the cortical areas, the BPM group exhibited decreased left lateral orbitofrontal cortex activation compared with both BPEs and HCs, increased dorsal anterior cingulate cortex activation compared with the BPD group, and increased dorsolateral prefrontal cortical activation compared with all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both state- and trait-related abnormalities in corticolimbic activation were seen in response to the negative facial emotion processing in a large sample of unmedicated adults across BP mood states. Copyright Â
Authors: M E Raichle; A M MacLeod; A Z Snyder; W J Powers; D A Gusnard; G L Shulman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-01-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: H P Blumberg; E Stern; D Martinez; S Ricketts; J de Asis; T White; J Epstein; P A McBride; D Eidelberg; J H Kocsis; D A Silbersweig Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Chi-Hua Chen; John Suckling; Cinly Ooi; Rebecca Jacob; Victoria Lupson; Ed T Bullmore; Belinda R Lennox Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Kathleen R Merikangas; Robert Jin; Jian-Ping He; Ronald C Kessler; Sing Lee; Nancy A Sampson; Maria Carmen Viana; Laura Helena Andrade; Chiyi Hu; Elie G Karam; Maria Ladea; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Yutaka Ono; Jose Posada-Villa; Rajesh Sagar; J Elisabeth Wells; Zahari Zarkov Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2011-03
Authors: Nathalie Vizueta; Jeffrey D Rudie; Jennifer D Townsend; Salvatore Torrisi; Teena D Moody; Susan Y Bookheimer; Lori L Altshuler Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Tom A Hummer; Leslie A Hulvershorn; Harish S Karne; Abigail D Gunn; Yang Wang; Amit Anand Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-08-04 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Stephen M Strakowski; David E Fleck; Jeffrey Welge; James C Eliassen; Matthew Norris; Michelle Durling; Richard A Komoroski; Wen-Jang Chu; Wade Weber; Jonathan A Dudley; Thomas J Blom; Amanda Stover; Christina Klein; Jeffrey R Strawn; Melissa P DelBello; Jing-Huei Lee; Caleb M Adler Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Anna Manelis; Cecile D Ladouceur; Simona Graur; Kelly Monk; Lisa K Bonar; Mary Beth Hickey; Amanda C Dwojak; David Axelson; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Genna Bebko; Michele A Bertocci; Danella M Hafeman; Mary Kay Gill; Boris Birmaher; Mary L Phillips Journal: Brain Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Amy S Garrett; Allan L Reiss; Meghan E Howe; Ryan G Kelley; Manpreet K Singh; Nancy E Adleman; Asya Karchemskiy; Kiki D Chang Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Ezra Wegbreit; Grace K Cushman; Megan E Puzia; Alexandra B Weissman; Kerri L Kim; Angela R Laird; Daniel P Dickstein Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: M A Brotman; W-L Tseng; A K Olsavsky; S J Fromm; E J Muhrer; J G Rutenberg; C M Deveney; N E Adleman; C A Zarate; D S Pine; E Leibenluft Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 7.723