| Literature DB >> 22206013 |
Kon-Ping Lin1, Bing-Wen Soong, Chih-Chao Yang, Li-Wen Huang, Ming-Hong Chang, I-Hui Lee, Anthony Antonellis, Antony Antonellis, Yi-Chung Lee.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 (CMT2) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of inherited axonal neuropathies. The aim of this study was to extensively investigate the mutational spectrum of CMT2 in a cohort of patients of Han Chinese. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22206013 PMCID: PMC3242783 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1AARS p.N71 is evolutionarily conserved, and p.N71Y segregates with CMT2N disease.
(A) Sense strand electropherogram of patient and control genomic DNA, showing the heterozygous AARS mutation c.211A>T in the patient DNA, corresponding to the amino acid substitution N71Y. (B) Evolutionarily conserved AARS p.N71 is shown using a protein sequence alignment of AlaRS orthologs. (C) The pedigree shows segregation of the p.N71Y mutation (the amino acid change shown in red) with CMT2N. The arrow indicates the proband (Patient II-1). The squares and circles represent males and females, and the close and open symbols represent affected and unaffected members. Family member II-5 was not genotyped.
Figure 2HSPB1 p.T164 is evolutionarily conserved and segregates with CMT2F in the family.
(A) Sense strand electropherogram of patient and control genomic DNA, showing the heterozygous HSPB1 mutation c.490A>G in the patients DNA, corresponding to the amino acid substitution T164A. (B) Evolutionarily conserved HSPB1 p.T164 is shown using a protein sequence alignment of HspB1 orthologs. (C) The pedigree depicts segregation of the T164A mutation (the amino acid change shown in red) with CMT2F.
Figure 3GDAP1 p.H256 and R282 are evolutionarily conserved, and the p.[H256R]+[R282H] mutations segregate with recessive CMT2.
(A) The GDAP1 compound heterozygous mutations c. [767A>G]+[c.845G>A], which putatively result in p.[H256R]+[R282H], are shown by sequencing TA-subcloned PCR fragments. (B) The evolutionarily conservation of GDAP1 p.H256 and R282 is shown using a protein sequence alignment of GDAP1 orthologs. (C) The pedigree shows segregation of the GDAP1 p.[H256R]+[R282H] mutation with autosomal recessive CMT.
Genetic and clinical information of patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth diseases type 2 in this study.
| Patient, gender | Age (yrs) | Gene | Nucleotide changes | Amino acid change | Age of onset (yrs) | MNCV (m/s, mV) | Family history | CMTNS |
|
| 51 |
| c.211A>T | p.N71Y | 30 | m38.1, 6.3; u42.1, 6.5; pNR | mother, siblings, son | 9 |
|
| 34 |
| c.490A>G | p.T164A | 20 | m32.1, 1.8; u34.5, 2.4; pNR | father, sister | 24 |
|
| 5 |
| c. [767A>G]+[845G>A] | p.[H256R]+ [R282H] | < 1 | m35.1, 2.3; u48.1, 1.8; pNR | no | 13 |
| 4, F | 26 |
| c.23C>G | p.P8R | 10 | m40.8, 0.5; u48.7, 0.6; pNR | father, brother | 16 |
| 5, M | 47 |
| c.23C>G | p.P8R | 10 | m38.2, 1.5; u37.8, 1.0; pNR | no | 13 |
| 6, F | 45 |
| c.64C>T | p.P22S | 12 | m33, 0.3; u41, 2.4; pNR | father, siblings | 12 |
| 7, F | 43 |
| c.1186G>A | p.E396K | 30 | m47.9, 2.6; u43.5, 2.5; p33.5, 0.2 | mother, siblings | 16 |
| 8, M | 27 |
| c.1186G>A | p.E396K | < 1 | m41.3, 1.6; u36.8, 5.6; pNR | sister | 10 |
| 9, F | 60 |
| c.1186G>A | p.E396K | 40 | m40.3, 7.5; u43.3, 5.4; p27.1, 1.2 | no | 11 |
|
| 20 |
| c.475-1G>T | p.T159_Q162del | 13 | m56.5, 9.8; u60.7,12.6; p38.8, 3.4 | father, brother | 7 |
|
| 41 |
| c.697C>G | p.L233V | 12 | m65.3, 9; u57.6, 4.6; p44, 6.5 | brother | 3 |
| 12, M | 6 |
| c.1090C>T | p.R364W | 2 | m37.2, 4; u42.9, 4.5; pNR | no | 15 |
| 13, M | 13 |
| c.1090C>T | p.R364W | 2 | m40.2, 0.2; uNR; pNR | no | 23 |
|
| 32 |
| c.2230_2231 delinsAT | p.E744M | 8 | m49, 5.2; u48.2, 3.9; pNR | father | 13 |
Abbreviations: MNCV, motor nerve conduction velocity; yrs, years; m/s, meter per second; mV, millivolt; m, median nerve; u, ulnar nerve; p, peroneal nerve; NR, no response; CMTNS, Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score [38].
*These patients have novel mutations.
Figure 4The MFN2 c.475-1G>T splice acceptor site mutation resulting in a 4-amino acid deletion.
(A) The genetic DNA electropherograms of the MFN2 c.475-1G>T mutation and wild type MFN2. (B) The structure of the minigene comprising the MFN2 genomic sequence from the 3′ end of intron 4 to the 5′ end of intron 7 cloned into intron 2 of the human beta-globulin (HBB) gene. The arrows depict the sequences that correspond to the primers that were used in the expression studies. (C) RT-PCR amplification of the minigene constructs (expressed in 293T and HeLa cells) using primers that are specific for MFN2 exons 5 and 7 (E5F and E7R). The wild type construct (WT) is correctly spliced, whereas the mutant construct (Mut) containing the MFN2 c.475-1G>T is aberrantly spliced, leading to a 12-bp cDNA fragment deletion. (D) The genomic sequences and cDNA electropherograms of the MFN2 exon 5 and 6 junction. The wild type, mutant, and cryptic splice acceptor site generated in the mutant allele are underlined. The MFN2 c.475-1G>T splice acceptor site mutation causes a 12-bp deletion in the cDNA (c.475_486delACTGTGAACCAG) and putatively a deletion of 4 amino acids in the MFN2 protein (p.T159_Q162del).