Literature DB >> 22205692

Exploring the initial steps of the testing process: frequency and nature of pre-preanalytic errors.

Paolo Carraro1, Tatiana Zago, Mario Plebani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the nature of errors in the so-called pre-preanalytic phase, the initial steps of the testing process. We therefore sought to evaluate pre-preanalytic errors using a study design that enabled us to observe the initial procedures performed in the ward, from the physician's test request to the delivery of specimens in the clinical laboratory.
METHODS: After a 1-week direct observational phase designed to identify the operating procedures followed in 3 clinical wards, we recorded all nonconformities and errors occurring over a 6-month period. Overall, the study considered 8547 test requests, for which 15 917 blood sample tubes were collected and 52 982 tests undertaken.
RESULTS: No significant differences in error rates were found between the observational phase and the overall study period, but underfilling of coagulation tubes was found to occur more frequently in the direct observational phase (P = 0.043). In the overall study period, the frequency of errors was found to be particularly high regarding order transmission [29 916 parts per million (ppm)] and hemolysed samples (2537 ppm). The frequency of patient misidentification was 352 ppm, and the most frequent nonconformities were test requests recorded in the diary without the patient's name and failure to check the patient's identity at the time of blood draw.
CONCLUSION: The data collected in our study confirm the relative frequency of pre-preanalytic errors and underline the need to consensually prepare and adopt effective standard operating procedures in the initial steps of laboratory testing and to monitor compliance with these procedures over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22205692     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.175711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  23 in total

1.  No preanalytical errors in laboratory testing: a beneficial aspect for patients.

Authors:  Satyavati V Rana
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-10

2.  Quality indicators to detect pre-analytical errors in laboratory testing.

Authors:  Mario Plebani
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2012-08

3.  Errors in the Extra-Analytical Phases of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Testing.

Authors:  Annalise E Zemlin
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2017-05-05

Review 4.  Current Methods of Haemolysis Detection and Reporting as a Source of Risk to Patient Safety: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Euan J McCaughey; Elia Vecellio; Rebecca Lake; Ling Li; Leslie Burnett; Douglas Chesher; Stephen Braye; Mark Mackay; Stephanie Gay; Tony C Badrick; Johanna I Westbrook; Andrew Georgiou
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2016-12

5.  Detecting Preanalytical Errors Using Quality Indicators in a Hematology Laboratory.

Authors:  Khalid Alshaghdali; Tessie Y Alcantara; Raja Rezgui; Charlie P Cruz; Munif H Alshammary; Yasser A Almotairi; Jerold C Alcantara
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 1.147

6.  Semi-automated biobank sample processing with a 384 high density sample tube robot used in cancer and cardiovascular studies.

Authors:  Johan Malm; Henrik Lindberg; David Erlinge; Roger Appelqvist; Maria Yakovleva; Charlotte Welinder; Erik Steinfelder; Thomas E Fehniger; György Marko-Varga
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2015-08-14

7.  Clinical biochemistry laboratory rejection rates due to various types of preanalytical errors.

Authors:  Aysenur Atay; Leyla Demir; Serap Cuhadar; Gulcan Saglam; Hulya Unal; Saliha Aksun; Banu Arslan; Asuman Ozkan; Recep Sutcu
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

8.  A new approach to standardize multicenter studies: mobile lab technology for the German Environmental Specimen Bank.

Authors:  Dominik Lermen; Daniel Schmitt; Martina Bartel-Steinbach; Christa Schröter-Kermani; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Hagen von Briesen; Heiko Zimmermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessment of patient safety culture in clinical laboratories in the Spanish National Health System.

Authors:  Angeles Giménez-Marín; Francisco Rivas-Ruiz; Ana M García-Raja; Rafael Venta-Obaya; Margarita Fusté-Ventosa; Inmaculada Caballé-Martín; Alfonso Benítez-Estevez; Ana I Quinteiro-García; José Luis Bedini; Antonio León-Justel; Montserrat Torra-Puig
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 10.  Harmonization of pre-analytical quality indicators.

Authors:  Mario Plebani; Laura Sciacovelli; Ada Aita; Maria Laura Chiozza
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.