Literature DB >> 22205691

Multiplex immunoassays of peptide hormones extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue accurately subclassify pituitary adenomas.

Frederick G Strathmann1, Grace Borlee, Donald E Born, Luis F Gonzalez-Cuyar, Bertrand R Huber, Geoffrey S Baird.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current gold standard for diagnostic classification of many solid-tissue neoplasms is immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. Although IHC is commonly used, there remain important issues related to preanalytic variability, nonstandard methods, and operator bias that may contribute to clinically significant error. To increase the quantitative accuracy and reliability of FFPE tissue-based diagnosis, we sought to develop a clinical proteomic method to characterize protein expression in pathologic tissue samples rapidly and quantitatively.
METHODS: We subclassified FFPE tissue from 136 clinical pituitary adenoma samples according to hormone translation with IHC and then extracted tissue proteins and quantified pituitary hormones with multiplex bead-based immunoassays. Hormone concentrations were normalized and compared across diagnostic groups. We developed a quantitative classification scheme for pituitary adenomas on archived samples and validated it on prospectively collected clinical samples.
RESULTS: The most abundant relative hormone concentrations differentiated sensitively and specifically between IHC-classified hormone-expressing adenoma types, correctly predicting IHC-positive diagnoses in 85% of cases overall, with discrepancies found only in cases of clinically nonfunctioning adenomas. Several adenomas with clinically relevant hormone-expressing phenotypes were identified with this assay yet called "null" by IHC, suggesting that multiplex immunoassays may be more sensitive than IHC for detecting clinically meaningful protein expression.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiplex immunoassays performed on FFPE tissue extracts can provide diagnostically relevant information and may exceed the performance of IHC in classifying some pituitary neoplasms. This technique is simple, largely amenable to automation, and likely applicable to other diagnostic problems in molecular pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22205691      PMCID: PMC4123741          DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.170613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  12 in total

Review 1.  Unmasking the mysteries of antigen or epitope retrieval and formalin fixation.

Authors:  Allen M Gown
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Breast cancer testing scandal shines spotlight on black box of clinical laboratory testing.

Authors:  Karyn Hede
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Quantitative immunocytochemistry of hypothalamic and pituitary hormones: validation of an automated, computerized image analysis system.

Authors:  D S Gross; J M Rothfeld
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Robert L Camp; Gina G Chung; David L Rimm
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  A multiplex immunoassay using the Guthrie specimen to detect T-cell deficiencies including severe combined immunodeficiency disease.

Authors:  David K Janik; Barbara Lindau-Shepard; Anne Marie Comeau; Kenneth A Pass
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 6.  Pathologic evaluation of unknown primary cancer.

Authors:  Karin A Oien
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 7.  Immunohistochemistry for beta-catenin in the differential diagnosis of spindle cell lesions: analysis of a series and review of the literature.

Authors:  J W Carlson; C D M Fletcher
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 8.  Pituitary adenoma: a clinician's perspective.

Authors:  Mary Lee Vance
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 9.  Practical pituitary pathology: what does the pathologist need to know?

Authors:  Sylvia L Asa
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 10.  Estrogen and progesterone receptor determinations in breast cancer. Technology, biology and clinical significance.

Authors:  S M Thorpe
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.089

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of Protein Profiles From Treated Xenograft Tumor Models Identifies an Antibody Panel for Formalin-fixed and Paraffin-embedded (FFPE) Tissue Analysis by Reverse Phase Protein Arrays (RPPA).

Authors:  Sabine Bader; Magdalena Zajac; Thomas Friess; Elisabeth Ruge; Natascha Rieder; Berthold Gierke; Yvonne Heubach; Marlene Thomas; Michael Pawlak
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Rapid Reticulin Fiber Staining Method is Helpful for the Diagnosis of Pituitary Adenoma in Frozen Section.

Authors:  Songmi Noh; Sun Ho Kim; Nam Hoon Cho; Se Hoon Kim
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.943

3.  A Sex-Dependent, Tropic Role for Leptin in the Somatotrope as a Regulator of POU1F1 and POU1F1-Dependent Hormones.

Authors:  Angela K Odle; Melody L Allensworth-James; Noor Akhter; Mohsin Syed; Anessa C Haney; Melanie MacNicol; Angus M MacNicol; Gwen V Childs
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  Heterogeneity analysis of the proteomes in clinically nonfunctional pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Xianquan Zhan; Xiaowei Wang; Ying Long; Dominic M Desiderio
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.063

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.