Literature DB >> 22205116

Atypical hyperplasia on core biopsy: is further surgery needed?

Ayfer Kamali Polat1, Amal Kanbour-Shakir, Oya Andacoglu, Ahmet Veysel Polat, Ronald Johnson, Marguerite Bonaventura, Atilla Soran.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) has been widely performed as a standard technique for initial histological diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions. There have been an increased number of atypical lesions diagnosed on CNB as a consequence of the advances in breast imaging techniques. The authors aim to identify if any of the radiological and histopathological criteria evaluated in this study can predict the presence of malignancy associated with atypical hyperplasia (AH) diagnosed on CNB.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 450 patients diagnosed with AH. Surgical excision was then performed and pathology revealed carcinoma or benign lesions. Patient age, imaging features, number of CNB samples taken, biopsy needle gauge, presence of additional proliferative diseases and calcification on CNB or excision were evaluated in both groups.
RESULTS: Fifty-one (11.3%) patients were found to have malignancy on surgical excision; 74.5% had ductal carcinoma in situ only and 25.6% had invasive cancer. In subgroup analysis, pure atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions were upgraded in 11.5%, pure atypical lobular hyperplasia lesions were upgraded in 8.1% and mixed lesions were upgraded in 17.6% (P > 0.05) of patients. The majority of the patients were older than 50 years, and calcification was the main reason for biopsy in both groups. The presence of additional proliferative lesions and needle gauge were not found to be statistically significant (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Upgrade rate to cancer after surgical excision was 11.3% of AH patients diagnosed on CNB. However, none of the variables are significant in determining the presence of malignancy associated with AH diagnosed by CNB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22205116     DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318234cc67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  7 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm Shifts in Breast Care Delivery: Impact of Imaging in a Multidisciplinary Environment.

Authors:  Savitri Krishnamurthy; Therese Bevers; Henry M Kuerer; Benjamin Smith; Wei Tse Yang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Value of breast MRI for patients with a biopsy showing atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH).

Authors:  Keiko Tsuchiya; Naoko Mori; David V Schacht; Deepa Sheth; Gregory S Karczmar; Gillian M Newstead; Hiroyuki Abe
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Absence of Residual Microcalcifications in Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosed via Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: Is Surgical Excision Obviated?

Authors:  Inyoung Youn; Min Jung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.588

4.  Quantitative nucleic features are effective for discrimination of intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast.

Authors:  Masatoshi Yamada; Akira Saito; Yoichiro Yamamoto; Eric Cosatto; Atsushi Kurata; Toshitaka Nagao; Ayako Tateishi; Masahiko Kuroda
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2016-01-29

Review 5.  Fine-needle versus core-needle biopsy - which one to choose in preoperative assessment of focal lesions in the breasts? Literature review.

Authors:  Ewa Łukasiewicz; Agnieszka Ziemiecka; Wiesław Jakubowski; Jelena Vojinovic; Magdalena Bogucevska; Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2017-12-29

6.  Clinical predictors of malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia on vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Diana Hodorowicz-Zaniewska; Karolina Brzuszkiewicz; Joanna Szpor; Wojciech Kibil; Andrzej Matyja; Katarzyna Dyląg-Trojanowska; Piotr Richter; Antoni M Szczepanik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 1.195

7.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia and the risk of underestimation: tissue sampling method, multifocality, and associated calcification significantly influence the diagnostic upgrade rate based on subsequent surgical specimens.

Authors:  Christoph J Rageth; Ravit Rubenov; Cristian Bronz; Daniel Dietrich; Christoph Tausch; Ann-Katrin Rodewald; Zsuzsanna Varga
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 4.239

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.