Literature DB >> 22205031

Population dynamics of naive and memory CD8 T cell responses after antigen stimulations in vivo.

Matthew D Martin1, Stephanie A Condotta, John T Harty, Vladimir P Badovinac.   

Abstract

The extent to which the progeny of one primary memory CD8 T cell differs from the progeny of one naive CD8 T cell of the same specificity remains an unresolved question. To explore cell-autonomous functional differences between naive and memory CD8 T cells that are not influenced by differences in the priming environment, an experimental model has been developed in which physiological numbers of both populations of cells were cotransferred into naive hosts before Ag stimulation. Interestingly, naive CD8 T cells undergo greater expansion in numbers than do primary memory CD8 T cells after various infections or immunizations. The intrinsic ability of one naive CD8 T cell to give rise to more effector CD8 T cells than one memory CD8 T cell is independent of the number and quality of primary memory CD8 T cells present in vivo. The sustained proliferation of newly activated naive CD8 T cells contributed to their greater magnitude of expansion. Additionally, longitudinal analyses of primary and secondary CD8 T cell responses revealed that on a per-cell basis naive CD8 T cells generate higher numbers of long-lived memory cells than do primary memory CD8 T cells. This enhanced "memory generation potential" of responding naive CD8 T cells occurred despite the delayed contraction of secondary CD8 T cell responses. Taken together, the data in this study revealed previously unappreciated differences between naive and memory CD8 T cells and will help further define the functional potential for both cell types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22205031      PMCID: PMC3262935          DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  50 in total

Review 1.  Development, trafficking, and function of memory T-cell subsets.

Authors:  Leo Lefrançois
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.988

2.  Cutting edge: central memory T cells do not show accelerated proliferation or tissue infiltration in response to localized herpes simplex virus-1 infection.

Authors:  Angus T Stock; Claerwen M Jones; William R Heath; Francis R Carbone
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 3.  Inflaming the CD8+ T cell response.

Authors:  Jodie S Haring; Vladimir P Badovinac; John T Harty
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 4.  Effector and memory CTL differentiation.

Authors:  Matthew A Williams; Michael J Bevan
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 28.527

5.  Initial T cell receptor transgenic cell precursor frequency dictates critical aspects of the CD8(+) T cell response to infection.

Authors:  Vladimir P Badovinac; Jodie S Haring; John T Harty
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 6.  Heterogeneity and cell-fate decisions in effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation during viral infection.

Authors:  Susan M Kaech; E John Wherry
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 7.  Shaping and reshaping CD8+ T-cell memory.

Authors:  John T Harty; Vladimir P Badovinac
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 53.106

8.  Inflammation directs memory precursor and short-lived effector CD8(+) T cell fates via the graded expression of T-bet transcription factor.

Authors:  Nikhil S Joshi; Weiguo Cui; Anmol Chandele; Heung Kyu Lee; David R Urso; James Hagman; Laurent Gapin; Susan M Kaech
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 9.  Developing and maintaining protective CD8+ memory T cells.

Authors:  Matthew A Williams; Brittany J Holmes; Joseph C Sun; Michael J Bevan
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.988

10.  CD8 T cell recall responses are regulated by the tissue tropism of the memory cell and pathogen.

Authors:  Kimberly D Klonowski; Amanda L Marzo; Kristina J Williams; Seung-Joo Lee; Quynh-Mai Pham; Leo Lefrançois
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 5.422

View more
  38 in total

1.  Inflammatory IL-15 is required for optimal memory T cell responses.

Authors:  Martin J Richer; Lecia L Pewe; Lisa S Hancox; Stacey M Hartwig; Steven M Varga; John T Harty
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  CD8 memory T cells have a bioenergetic advantage that underlies their rapid recall ability.

Authors:  Gerritje J W van der Windt; David O'Sullivan; Bart Everts; Stanley Ching-Cheng Huang; Michael D Buck; Jonathan D Curtis; Chih-Hao Chang; Amber M Smith; Teresa Ai; Brandon Faubert; Russell G Jones; Edward J Pearce; Erika L Pearce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  CD8+ T cell immune response against non-viral pathogens.

Authors:  Imtiaz A Khan
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 4.  Influence of time and number of antigen encounters on memory CD8 T cell development.

Authors:  Matthew D Martin; Vladimir P Badovinac
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.829

5.  Memory T cell-driven differentiation of naive cells impairs adoptive immunotherapy.

Authors:  Christopher A Klebanoff; Christopher D Scott; Anthony J Leonardi; Tori N Yamamoto; Anthony C Cruz; Claudia Ouyang; Madhu Ramaswamy; Rahul Roychoudhuri; Yun Ji; Robert L Eil; Madhusudhanan Sukumar; Joseph G Crompton; Douglas C Palmer; Zachary A Borman; David Clever; Stacy K Thomas; Shashankkumar Patel; Zhiya Yu; Pawel Muranski; Hui Liu; Ena Wang; Francesco M Marincola; Alena Gros; Luca Gattinoni; Steven A Rosenberg; Richard M Siegel; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Aging promotes acquisition of naive-like CD8+ memory T cell traits and enhanced functionalities.

Authors:  Jens Eberlein; Bennett Davenport; Tom Nguyen; Francisco Victorino; Kelsey Haist; Kevin Jhun; Anis Karimpour-Fard; Lawrence Hunter; Ross Kedl; Eric T Clambey; Dirk Homann
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  TCR independent suppression of CD8(+) T cell cytokine production mediated by IFNγ in vivo.

Authors:  Martin P Hosking; Claudia T Flynn; J Lindsay Whitton
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  CD4+ T cells recognize unique and conserved 2009 H1N1 influenza hemagglutinin epitopes after natural infection and vaccination.

Authors:  Junbao Yang; Eddie James; Theresa J Gates; Jonathan H DeLong; Rebecca E LaFond; Uma Malhotra; William W Kwok
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.823

9.  Sustained and incomplete recovery of naive CD8+ T cell precursors after sepsis contributes to impaired CD8+ T cell responses to infection.

Authors:  Stephanie A Condotta; Deepa Rai; Britnie R James; Thomas S Griffith; Vladimir P Badovinac
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Memory CD8⁺ T cells can outsource IFN-γ production but not cytolytic killing for antiviral protection.

Authors:  Sanda Remakus; Daniel Rubio; Avital Lev; Xueying Ma; Min Fang; Ren-Huan Xu; Luis J Sigal
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 21.023

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.