Literature DB >> 2220367

Retinal nerve fiber layer in multiple sclerosis.

P Elbøl1, K Work.   

Abstract

To evaluate the usefulness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) appearance in estimation of optic nerve damage in MS, we examined 20 patients with definite MS and 20 normal control patients. Photographs of the RNFL in 80 eyes were classified as normal or abnormal by two examiners working independently. The results were very similar, even though the clinical data of which they were informed and their experience with RNFL-evaluation differed. We found RNFL defects in 80% of MS patients and in 73% of MS eyes. In the control group the values were 5% and 2.5%. Subclinical optic neuropathy in eyes without any history of optic neuritis was demonstrated by RNFL defects in 68%. We conclude, that in detecting clinical and subclinical optic neuropathy, RNFL-evaluation is to be recommended as the method of choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2220367     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1990.tb01680.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)        ISSN: 0001-639X


  9 in total

Review 1.  Assessing structure and function of the afferent visual pathway in multiple sclerosis and associated optic neuritis.

Authors:  Madhan Kolappan; Andrew P D Henderson; Thomas M Jenkins; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; Gordon T Plant; Alan J Thompson; David H Miller
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Optical coherence tomography is less sensitive than visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis.

Authors:  R T Naismith; N T Tutlam; J Xu; J B Shepherd; E C Klawiter; S-K Song; A H Cross
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Measurement of the retinal nerve fibre layer with scanning laser polarimetry in patients with previous demyelinating optic neuritis.

Authors:  D H Steel; A Waldock
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Focal macular photopic negative response in patients with optic neuritis.

Authors:  H Nakamura; K Miyamoto; S Yokota; K Ogino; N Yoshimura
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Comparison of optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Amanda Quelly; Han Cheng; Michal Laron; Jade S Schiffman; Rosa A Tang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  The relationship between visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Han Cheng; Michal Laron; Jade S Schiffman; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Optical coherence tomography differs in neuromyelitis optica compared with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  R T Naismith; N T Tutlam; J Xu; E C Klawiter; J Shepherd; K Trinkaus; S-K Song; A H Cross
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 8.  Past, present and future role of retinal imaging in neurodegenerative disease.

Authors:  Amir H Kashani; Samuel Asanad; Jane W Chan; Maxwell B Singer; Jiong Zhang; Mona Sharifi; Maziyar M Khansari; Farzan Abdolahi; Yonggang Shi; Alessandro Biffi; Helena Chui; John M Ringman
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 19.704

9.  Optimal Intereye Difference Thresholds in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness for Predicting a Unilateral Optic Nerve Lesion in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Rachel C Nolan; Steven L Galetta; Teresa C Frohman; Elliot M Frohman; Peter A Calabresi; Carmen Castrillo-Viguera; Diego Cadavid; Laura J Balcer
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.042

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.