| Literature DB >> 22203456 |
Koichi Aiura1, Taizo Hibi, Hiroto Fujisaki, Minoru Kitago, Minoru Tanabe, Shigeyuki Kawachi, Osamu Itano, Masahiro Shinoda, Hiroshi Yagi, Yohei Masugi, Michiie Sakamoto, Yuko Kitagawa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited resection is reserved for patients with high operative risk or benign adenomas. We aimed to define indications for limited resection of early ampulla of Vater carcinoma with curative intent through detailed preoperative examinations and histopathological evaluations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22203456 PMCID: PMC3501187 DOI: 10.1007/s00534-011-0492-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ISSN: 1868-6974 Impact factor: 7.027
Demographic characteristics of the patients with adenoma or adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater
| Adenoma | Adenocarcinoma | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 18 | 57 | 75 | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 12 | 35 | 47 | |
| Female | 6 | 22 | 28 | |
| Age (years) mean ± SD (range) | 59 ± 11.1 (26–73) | 65 ± 9.1 (43–79) | 64 ± 10.1 (26–79) | |
| Operative procedure | ||||
| PD/PPPD | 1 | 51 | 52 | |
| CRBA | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| TDP | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| EP | 15 | 3 | 18 | |
| Tumor size (mm) mean ± SD (range) | 14.7 ± 5.2 (8–30) | 23.0 ± 11.3 (11–40) | 21.0 ± 10.8 (8–40) | |
| Macroscopic tumor type | ||||
| Exposed protruded type | 17 | 27 | 44 | |
| Non-exposed protruded type | 1 | 10 | 11 | |
| Ulcerative type | 0 | 20 | 20 | |
PD pancreatoduodenectomy, PPPD pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy, CRBA complete resection of the extrahepatic portion of the common bile duct and the ampulla of Vater, TDP transduodenal papillectomy, EP endoscopic papillectomy
Relationship of clinico-histopathological factors to lymph node metastases
| Variable | Lymph node metastases (%) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| ≤65 years | 9/25 (36) | 0.749 |
| >65 years | 14/32 (44) | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 14/35 (40) | 0.834 |
| Female | 9/22 (41) | |
| Macroscopic type | ||
| Exposed protruded type | 8/27 (30) | 0.179 |
| Non-exposed protruded type | 3/10 (30) | |
| Ulcerative type | 12/20 (60) | |
| Histopathological differentiation | ||
| pap/wel | 5/28 (17.9) | 0.002 |
| mod/por | 18/29 (62.1) | |
| Tumor size (mm) | ||
| 1–10 | 2/4 (50) | 0.996 |
| 11–20 | 8/22 (36) | |
| 21–30 | 8/22 (36) | |
| 31–40 | 3/6 (50) | |
| 41+ | 2/3 (67) | |
| Lympho-vascular invasion | ||
| Negative | 0/23 (0) | <0.001 |
| Positive | 23/34 (68) | |
| Perineural invasion | ||
| Negative | 14/47 (30) | 0.001 |
| Positive | 9/10 (90) | |
| Duodenal invasion | ||
| Negative | 0/17 (0) | 0.004 |
| Positive | 23/40 (57) | |
| Pancreatic invasion | ||
| Negative | 5/32 (16) | <0.001 |
| Positive | 18/25 (72) | |
| CBD size in ERCP | ||
| ≤10 mm | 0/3 (0) | 0.354 |
| >10 mm | 19/42 (45) | |
| P-duct size in ERCP | ||
| ≤3 mm | 2/10 (20) | 0.362 |
| >3 mm | 14/33 (42) | |
| Ab | ||
| Negative | 18/44 (41) | 0.87 |
| Positive | 5/13 (38) | |
| Ap | ||
| Negative | 8/26 (31) | 0.28 |
| Positive | 15/31 (48) | |
pap papillary, wel well-differentiated, mod moderately, por poorly differentiated, CBD common bile duct, P-duct main pancreatic duct, ERCP endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography, Ab ductal infiltration into the bile duct, Ap ductal infiltration into the pancreatic duct
Relationship of macroscopic type with histopathological differentiation type
| Macroscopic type | Adenoma | Adenocarcinoma | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pap/wel | mod/por | |||
| No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | |
| Exposed protruded | 17 (38.6) | 19 (43.2) | 8 (18.2) | 44 (100) |
| Non-exposed protruded | 1 (9.1) | 5 (45.4) | 5 (45.4) | 11 (100) |
| Ulcerativea | 0 | 4 (20) | 16 (80) | 20 (100) |
pap papillary, wel well-differentiated, mod moderately, por poorly differentiated
aUlcerative type tumors had a significantly higher rate of mod/por adenocarcinoma compared with exposed protruded type tumors (P < 0.001)
Relationship of macroscopic type with duodenal invasion
| Macroscopic type | Du0 | ≥Du1 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exposed protruded | 32 (72.7) | 12 (27.3) | 44 (100) |
| Non-exposed protrudeda | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | 11 (100) |
| Ulcerativea | 2 (10) | 18 (90) | 20 (100) |
Du0 invasion limited to the duodenal mucosa or sphincter of Oddi, ≥Du1 invasion beyond the sphincter of Oddi
aThe non-exposed protruded type and ulcerative type tumors had a significantly higher rate of ≥Du1 compared with the exposed protruded type (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively)
Histological agreement between preoperative biopsies and resected specimens
| Histology of preoperative biopsies | Final diagnosis of resected specimens | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adenoma | Adenocarcinoma | |||
| Low-grade | High-grade | pap/wel | mod/por | |
| Chronic inflammation | 2 | |||
| Adenoma | ||||
| Low-grade | 7 | 3 | 4 | |
| High-grade | 2 | 6 | 4 | 1 |
| Adenocarcinoma | ||||
| pap/wel | 16 | 9 | ||
| mod/por | 2 | 15 | ||
Data are number of patients
Low-grade low-grade dysplasia, High-grade high-grade dysplasia, pap papillary, wel well-differentiated, por poorly differentiated
Diagnostic agreement of endoscopic ultrasonography for duodenal invasion
| EUS | Pathology | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Du0 | ≥Du1 | ||
| Du0 | 26 | 7 | 33 |
| ≥Du1 | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| Total | 28 | 23 | 51 |
Data are number of patients
EUS endoscopic ultrasonography, Du0 invasion limited to the duodenal mucosa or sphincter of Oddi, ≥Du1 invasion beyond the sphincter of Oddi
Characteristics of patients with underestimation (Du0) of endoscopic ultrasonography for duodenal invasion
| Patient no. | Pathological Du | Macroscopic type | Histological type | PD diameter on ERCP (mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | Final | ||||
| 1 | 1 | NEP | por | wel | 5 |
| 2 | 1 | NEP | High-grade | wel | 5 |
| 3 | 1 | EP | wel | mod | 7 |
| 4 | 1 | EP | wel | wel | 12 |
| 5 | 1 | EP | wel | wel | 10 |
| 6 | 1 | NEP | mod | mod | 5 |
| 7 | 1 | EP | por | por | 10 |
Du duodenum, NEP non-exposed protruded, EP exposed protruded, High-grade adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, wel well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, mod moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, por poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, PD pancreatic duct, ERCP endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Diagnostic agreement of intraductal ultrasonography for ductal infiltration into PD
| IDUS | Pathology | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ap (−) | Ap (+) | ||
| Ap (−) | 26 | 4 | 30 |
| Ap (+) | 1 | 14 | 15 |
| Total | 27 | 18 | 45 |
Data are number of patients
PD pancreatic duct, Ap ductal infiltration into the pancreatic duct
Diagnostic agreement of PD diameter found by ERCP for ductal infiltration into the PD
| PD diameter (mm) from ERCP | Pathology | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ap (−) | Ap (+) | ||
| ≤3 | 16 | 1 | 17 |
| 4–5 | 8 | 11 | 19 |
| 6–10 | 7 | 14 | 21 |
| ≥11 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Total | 31 | 28 | 59 |
Data are number of patients
ERCP endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, PD pancreatic duct, Ap ductal infiltration into the pancreatic duct
Diagnostic agreement of combination of IDUS and PD diameter in ERCP for ductal infiltration into PD
| IDUS and PD diameter (mm) | Pathology | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ap (−) | Ap (+) | ||
| Ap (−) and ≤3 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Ap (+) and/or ≥4 | 12 | 15 | 27 |
| Total | 25 | 15 | 40 |
Data are number of patients
ERCP endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, IDUS intraductal ultrasonography, PD pancreatic duct, Ap ductal infiltration into the pancreatic duct
Proposed indications for limited resection
| Requirements | Diagnostic work-up |
|---|---|
| Exposed protruding macroscopic type | Endoscopy |
| Adenoma or papillary/well-differentiated adenocarcinoma | Biopsy |
| Negative duodenal invasion | EUS |
| No tumor infiltration into the pancreatic duct | IDUS |
| Pancreatic duct diameter of 3 mm or less | ERCP |
EUS endoscopic ultrasonography, IDUS intraductal ultrasonography, ERCP endoscopic retrograde cholangiography
Characteristics and outcome of 11 patients who satisfied the 5 factors indicating suitability for limited resection of ampullary tumors
| Patient no. | Surgery | Final histological type | Lympho-vascular/perineural invasion | Pathological Du | Lymph node metasatases | Outcome (follow-up period, months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TDP | wel | Negative | m | None | Alive (161) |
| 2 | TDP | wel | Negative | m | None | Alive (40) |
| 3 | CRBA | wel | Negative | m | None | Alive (18) |
| 4 | EP | wel | Negative | od | NA | Alive (49) |
| 5 | EP | Low-grade | Negative | m | NA | Alive (19) |
| 6 | EP | Low-grade | Negative | m | NA | Alive (14) |
| 7 | EP | High-grade | Negative | m | NA | Alive (51) |
| 8 | TDP | High-grade | Negative | m | Nonee | Alive (84) |
| 9 | EP | High-grade | Negative | m | NA | Alive (82) |
| 10 | EP | Low-grade | Negative | m | NA | Alive (113) |
| 11 | EP | Low-grade | Negative | m | NA | Alive (101) |
Du duodenum, TDP transduodenal papillectomy, CRBA complete resection of the extrahepatic portion of the common bile duct and the ampulla of Vater, EP endoscopic papillectomy, wel well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, Low-grade adenoma with low-grade dysplasia, High-grade adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, m invasion limited to the duodenal mucosa, od invasion limited to the sphincter of Oddi, NA not available