Literature DB >> 22202589

Deconstructing a state-of-the-art review of the asbestos brake industry.

David Steven Egilman, Emily Laura Ardolino, Samantha Howe, Tess Bird.   

Abstract

State of the art is a legal concept that describes what was known as knowable by experts including manufacturer's state of knowledge about the potential hazards of their product(s) at a point in time. In 2004, Paustenbach et al. published a state-of-the-art review that describes the development of knowledge about asbestos hazards to brake mechanics performing asbestos brake installation and maintenance. Paustenbach et al.'s review, however, omits important pieces of corporate knowledge, dismisses several historical scientific conclusions and ignores the way experts have applied the results of scientific research to protect workers and consumers handling asbestos brakes. By taking their state-of-the-art review out of the legal liability context, Paustenbach et al. create a misleading version of events that fails to properly address the question of what asbestos brake manufacturers knew or should have known about the potential hazards of their brakes to mechanics over time. Without proper presentation of this information, judges and juries cannot adequately assess whether these companies had a duty to warn or take other action to prevent injury to those exposed to their asbestos brakes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22202589     DOI: 10.2190/NS.21.4.e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Solut        ISSN: 1048-2911


  2 in total

1.  Withdrawn: The production of corporate research to manufacture doubt about the health hazards of products: an overview of the Exponent Bakelite™ simulation study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-04-29

2.  Dust diseases and the legacy of corporate manipulation of science and law.

Authors:  David Egilman; Tess Bird; Caroline Lee
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-03-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.