Literature DB >> 22201528

Frequency selectivity of contralateral residual acoustic hearing in bimodal cochlear implant users, and limitations on the ability to match the pitch of electric and acoustic stimuli.

Tim Green1, Andrew Faulkner, Stuart Rosen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of across-ear, acoustic-electric pitch/timbre comparisons for determining effective characteristic frequencies of cochlear implant electrodes. STUDY SAMPLE: Nine CI users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
DESIGN: Absolute acoustic thresholds in the unimplanted ear were measured and frequency selectivity was assessed via psychophysical tuning curves. An adjustment method was used to match the percepts elicited by pulse trains on individual electrodes with various acoustic signals (pure tones, narrow-band noises, and bandpass filtered pulse trains). The starting frequency of the acoustic signal was roved and matches were obtained at different loudness levels.
RESULTS: Acoustic frequency selectivity varied widely. Two subjects showed clear evidence of frequency selectivity extending above 500 Hz. Only these subjects produced consistent pitch matches over repeated measurements. For other subjects, the acoustic frequency eventually selected tended to correlate with the initially presented frequency. There was limited evidence of level effects and these were inconsistent across subjects and electrodes.
CONCLUSIONS: Across-modality pitch/timbre matching appears unlikely to provide a generally applicable method for determining the effective characteristic frequencies of cochlear implant electrodes. Frequency selectivity above 500 Hz may be necessary for consistent pitch/timbre matches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22201528     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.642010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  7 in total

1.  Effects of Removing Low-Frequency Electric Information on Speech Perception With Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Jennifer R Fowler; Jessica L Eggleston; Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing.

Authors:  Chin-Tuan Tan; Brett Martin; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  The sound sensation of apical electric stimulation in cochlear implant recipients with contralateral residual hearing.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Jeremy Marozeau; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pitch Matching in Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness: Effects of Electrode Position and Acoustic Stimulus Type.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Sharon Nagel; Tobias Weissgerber; Uwe Baumann; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Frequency Fitting Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithm in Cochlear Implant Users with Bimodal Binaural Hearing.

Authors:  Alexis Saadoun; Antoine Schein; Vincent Péan; Pierrick Legrand; Ludwig Serge Aho Glélé; Alexis Bozorg Grayeli
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-11

6.  Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Qing Tang; Thomas Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Musical Emotion Perception in Bimodal Patients: Relative Weighting of Musical Mode and Tempo Cues.

Authors:  Kristen L D'Onofrio; Meredith Caldwell; Charles Limb; Spencer Smith; David M Kessler; René H Gifford
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.