Literature DB >> 22201469

The effect of fMRI (noise) on cognitive control.

Bernhard Hommel1, Rico Fischer, Lorenza S Colzato, Wery P M van den Wildenberg, Cristiano Cellini.   

Abstract

Stressful situations, the aversiveness of events, or increases in task difficulty (e.g., conflict) have repeatedly been shown to be capable of triggering attentional control adjustments. In the present study we tested whether the particularity of an fMRI testing environment (i.e., EPI noise) might result in such increases of the cognitive control exerted. We found that participants were more effective in controlling episodic retrieval of previous stimulus-response bindings (Experiment 1), in switching to a new task (Experiment 2), and shielding a current goal from distracting response tendencies (Experiment 3) if they were exposed to challenging task situations, such as 70 dB echo planar imaging noise sampled from an fMRI scanner. These findings have considerable theoretical implications in questioning the widespread assumption that people are equally devoted to easy and more challenging tasks, and methodological implications in raising the possibility that experiments carried out in fMRI scanners or under otherwise challenging conditions systematically overestimate contributions from cognitive control processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22201469     DOI: 10.1037/a0026353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay.

Authors:  W Duthoo; E L Abrahamse; S Braem; W Notebaert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07

2.  The Place of Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy in Psychiatry.

Authors:  Bora Baskak
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 1.339

3.  Are reaction times obtained during fMRI scanning reliable and valid measures of behavior?

Authors:  Jan Willem Koten; Robert Langner; Guilherme Wood; Klaus Willmes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Mobilizing cognition for speeded action: try-harder instructions promote motivated readiness in the constant-foreperiod paradigm.

Authors:  Michael B Steinborn; Robert Langner; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-20

5.  Impact of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanner noise on affective state and attentional performance.

Authors:  Shawna N Jacob; Paula K Shear; Matthew Norris; Matthew Smith; Jeff Osterhage; Stephen M Strakowski; Michael Cerullo; David E Fleck; Jing-Huei Lee; James C Eliassen
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.475

6.  Greater risk sensitivity of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in young smokers than in nonsmokers.

Authors:  Adriana Galván; Tom Schonberg; Jeanette Mumford; Milky Kohno; Russell A Poldrack; Edythe D London
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Cognitive control of feature bindings: evidence from children with autistic spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Sharon Zmigrod; Leo M J de Sonneville; Lorenza S Colzato; Hanna Swaab; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-06

8.  Self-generated thoughts and depression: from daydreaming to depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Igor Marchetti; Eowyn Van de Putte; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Conflict adaptation is predicted by the cognitive, but not the affective alexithymia dimension.

Authors:  Michiel de Galan; Roberta Sellaro; Lorenza S Colzato; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-22

Review 10.  Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.