Literature DB >> 22201448

Multiple imitation mechanisms in children.

Francys Subiaul1, Sarah Anderson, Janina Brandt, Jenny Elkins.   

Abstract

Four studies using a computerized paradigm investigated whether children's imitation performance is content-specific and to what extent dependent on other cognitive processes such as trial-and-error learning, recall, and observational learning. Experiment 1 showed that 3-year-olds could successfully imitate what we call novel cognitive rules (e.g., first → second → third), which involved responding to 3 different pictures whose spatial configuration varied randomly from trial to trial. However, these same children failed to imitate what we call novel motor-spatial rules (e.g., up → down → right), which involved responding to 3 identical pictures that remained in a fixed spatial configuration from trial to trial. Experiment 2 showed that this dissociation was not due to a general difficulty in encoding motor-spatial content, as children successfully recalled, following a 30-s delay, a new motor-spatial sequence that had been learned by trial and error. Experiment 3 replicated these results and further demonstrated that 3-year-olds can infer a novel motor-spatial sequence following observation of a partially correct and partially incorrect response-a dissociation between imitation and observational learning (or emulation learning). Finally, Experiment 4 presented 3-year-olds with "familiar" motor-spatial sequences that involved making a linear response (e.g., left → middle → right) as well as "novel" motor-spatial sequences (e.g., right → up → down) used in Experiments 1-3 that were nonlinear and always involved a change in direction. Children had no difficulty imitating familiar motor-spatial sequences but again failed to imitate novel motor-spatial sequences. These results suggest that there may be multiple, dissociable imitation learning mechanisms that are content-specific. More importantly, the development of these imitation systems appears to be independent of the operations of other cognitive systems, including trial and error learning, recall, and observational learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22201448     DOI: 10.1037/a0026646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  7 in total

1.  Specialization in the vicarious learning of novel arbitrary sequences in humans but not orangutans.

Authors:  Elizabeth Renner; Eric M Patterson; Francys Subiaul
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Do semantic contextual cues facilitate transfer learning from video in toddlers?

Authors:  Laura Zimmermann; Alecia Moser; Amanda Grenell; Kelly Dickerson; Qianwen Yao; Peter Gerhardstein; Rachel Barr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-12

Review 3.  What's Special about Human Imitation? A Comparison with Enculturated Apes.

Authors:  Francys Subiaul
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-07

4.  Vocal Imitations of Non-Vocal Sounds.

Authors:  Guillaume Lemaitre; Olivier Houix; Frédéric Voisin; Nicolas Misdariis; Patrick Susini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Observing errors in a combination of error and correct models favors observational motor learning.

Authors:  Zhi-Ming Tang; Yutaka Oouchida; Meng-Xin Wang; Zu-Lin Dou; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  Imitation by combination: preschool age children evidence summative imitation in a novel problem-solving task.

Authors:  Francys Subiaul; Edward Krajkowski; Elizabeth E Price; Alexander Etz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-28

7.  Neural responses when learning spatial and object sequencing tasks via imitation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Renner; Jessica P White; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Francys Subiaul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.