OBJECTIVE: To examine how genes and environments contribute to relationships among Trail Making Test (TMT) conditions and the extent to which these conditions have unique genetic and environmental influences. METHOD: Participants included 1,237 middle-aged male twins from the Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging. The Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System TMT included visual searching, number and letter sequencing, and set-shifting components. RESULTS: Phenotypic correlations among TMT conditions ranged from 0.29 to 0.60, and genes accounted for the majority (58-84%) of each correlation. Overall heritability ranged from 0.34 to 0.62 across conditions. Phenotypic factor analysis suggested a single factor. In contrast, genetic models revealed a single common genetic factor but also unique genetic influences separate from the common factor. Genetic variance (i.e., heritability) of number and letter sequencing was completely explained by the common genetic factor while unique genetic influences separate from the common factor accounted for 57% and 21% of the heritabilities of visual search and set shifting, respectively. After accounting for general cognitive ability, unique genetic influences accounted for 64% and 31% of those heritabilities. CONCLUSION: A common genetic factor, most likely representing a combination of speed and sequencing, accounted for most of the correlation among TMT 1-4. Distinct genetic factors, however, accounted for a portion of variance in visual scanning and set shifting. Thus, although traditional phenotypic shared variance analysis techniques suggest only one general factor underlying different neuropsychological functions in nonpatient populations, examining the genetic underpinnings of cognitive processes with twin analysis can uncover more complex etiological processes.
OBJECTIVE: To examine how genes and environments contribute to relationships among Trail Making Test (TMT) conditions and the extent to which these conditions have unique genetic and environmental influences. METHOD:Participants included 1,237 middle-aged male twins from the Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging. The Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System TMT included visual searching, number and letter sequencing, and set-shifting components. RESULTS: Phenotypic correlations among TMT conditions ranged from 0.29 to 0.60, and genes accounted for the majority (58-84%) of each correlation. Overall heritability ranged from 0.34 to 0.62 across conditions. Phenotypic factor analysis suggested a single factor. In contrast, genetic models revealed a single common genetic factor but also unique genetic influences separate from the common factor. Genetic variance (i.e., heritability) of number and letter sequencing was completely explained by the common genetic factor while unique genetic influences separate from the common factor accounted for 57% and 21% of the heritabilities of visual search and set shifting, respectively. After accounting for general cognitive ability, unique genetic influences accounted for 64% and 31% of those heritabilities. CONCLUSION: A common genetic factor, most likely representing a combination of speed and sequencing, accounted for most of the correlation among TMT 1-4. Distinct genetic factors, however, accounted for a portion of variance in visual scanning and set shifting. Thus, although traditional phenotypic shared variance analysis techniques suggest only one general factor underlying different neuropsychological functions in nonpatient populations, examining the genetic underpinnings of cognitive processes with twin analysis can uncover more complex etiological processes.
Authors: Michelle Luciano; Margaret J Wright; Gina M Geffen; Laurie B Geffen; Glen A Smith; Nicholas G Martin Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Cinzia R De Luca; Stephen J Wood; Vicki Anderson; Jo-Anne Buchanan; Tina M Proffitt; Kate Mahony; Christos Pantelis Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Daniel E Gustavson; Matthew S Panizzon; Carol E Franz; Chandra A Reynolds; Robin P Corley; John K Hewitt; Michael J Lyons; William S Kremen; Naomi P Friedman Journal: J Exp Psychol Gen Date: 2019-03-21
Authors: Daniel E Gustavson; Matthew S Panizzon; Jeremy A Elman; Carol E Franz; Asad Beck; Chandra A Reynolds; Kristen C Jacobson; Hong Xian; Rosemary Toomey; Michael J Lyons; William S Kremen Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: A J Schork; T T Brown; D J Hagler; W K Thompson; C-H Chen; A M Dale; T L Jernigan; N Akshoomoff Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: G Peggy McFall; Sandra A Wiebe; David Vergote; David Westaway; Jack Jhamandas; Roger A Dixon Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 4.673