Literature DB >> 22200931

Hemodynamic response, arrhythmic risk, and overall safety of regadenoson as a pharmacologic stress agent for myocardial perfusion imaging in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchial asthma patients.

Zehra Husain1, Gurunanthan Palani, Rafael Cabrera, Aarthee S Karthikeyan, Sunitha Dhanalakota, Suba Pathmanathan, Gordon Jacobsen, Karthik Ananthasubramaniam.   

Abstract

Regadenoson (REG) is a A2a receptor selective pharmacologic SPECT imaging agent. Its safety in unselected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma (AM) undergoing SPECT imaging has not been well evaluated. We retrospectively identified 228 patients (COPD n = 126 and AM n = 102, Grp 1) undergoing REG SPECT from Jan to Nov 2009 and compared to 1,142 patients without COPD and AM (control, Grp 2). A standard 400 μg REG bolus was used and gated Tc-99 m tetrofosmin SPECT done. Patient demographics, REG SPECT data, side effects, arrhythmia occurrences, and any exacerbation of COPD or AM leading to treatment, hospitalization or death were evaluated. The side effect profile of Grp 1 was also compared to a historical cohort who underwent intravenous dipyridamole thallium-201 imaging and adenosine SPECT. Both groups were comparable with regards to baseline characteristics. There was 0% incidence of clinical exacerbation of COPD or AM after REG. COPD patients had more non-significant arrhythmias (58.3% vs. Grp 2, 43%, P = 0.004). There was 0% incidence of any atrio-ventricular block and only 2 instances of brief supraventricular tachycardia. When compared to the historical cohort of COPD who underwent IV dipyridamole thallium imaging, COPD in Grp 1, had more dyspnea and flushing and when compared to COPD/AM patients who underwent adenosine SPECT, Grp 1 pts had more of flushing and headache (24.9% vs. 2.8%, P = <0.001) but less of bronchospasm (1.3% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.022) and AV block (0% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.014). REG SPECT can be safely performed in COPD and AM population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22200931     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-0003-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  24 in total

Review 1.  Adenosine and adenosine receptors in the cardiovascular system: biochemistry, physiology, and pharmacology.

Authors:  J C Shryock; L Belardinelli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-06-19       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Is the dyspnea during adenosine cardiac stress test caused by bronchospasm?

Authors:  K K Balan; M Critchley
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3.  Dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  M L Geleijnse; A Elhendy; P M Fioretti; J R Roelandt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Patricia Nguyen; Peter Staehr; S Richard Underwood; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05

5.  Hemodynamic responses and adverse effects associated with adenosine and dipyridamole pharmacologic stress testing: a comparison in 2,000 patients.

Authors:  D L Johnston; J R Daley; D O Hodge; M R Hopfenspirger; R J Gibbons
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Side effect profile and tolerability of adenosine myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with mild asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Eliana Reyes; Chee Y Loong; Kshama Wechalekar; Katherine Latus; Constantinos Anagnostopoulos; S Richard Underwood
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  The future of pharmacologic stress: selective A2A adenosine receptor agonists.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Regadenoson.

Authors:  Karly P Garnock-Jones; Monique P Curran
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.571

9.  Safety of regadenoson, an adenosine A2A receptor agonist for myocardial perfusion imaging, in mild asthma and moderate asthma patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Brian R Leaker; B O'Connor; Trevor T Hansel; Peter J Barnes; Lixen Meng; Vandana S Mathur; Hsiao D Lieu
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Frequency and significance of cardiac arrhythmias in chronic obstructive lung disease.

Authors:  H T Shih; C R Webb; W A Conway; E Peterson; B Tilley; S Goldstein
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  15 in total

1.  Prevalence and significance of electrocardiographic changes and side effect profile of regadenoson compared with adenosine during myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Maliha Zahid; Aaysha Kapila; Cecelia E Eagan; David A Yusko; Edwin D Miller; Cheryl D Missenda
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dis Res       Date:  2013-02-27

2.  Safety of regadenoson stress testing in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Victor M Moles; Thomas Cascino; Ashraf Saleh; Krasimira Mikhova; John J Lazarus; Michael Ghannam; Hong J Yun; Matthew Konerman; Richard L Weinberg; Edward P Ficaro; James R Corbett; Vallerie V McLaughlin; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Safer stress tests for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Sang-Geon Cho; Zeenat Jabin; Henry Hee-Seung Bom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Adverse effects associated with regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Incidence of atrioventricular block with vasodilator stress SPECT: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Charity J Morgan; Lizbeth Brice; Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Harish Doppalapudi; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Comparative study of the safety of regadenoson between patients with mild/moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma.

Authors:  Carlos Salgado Garcia; Carlos Salgado Garcia; Amelia Jimenez Heffernan; Amelia Jimenez Heffernan; Elena Sanchez de Mora; Carlos Ramos Font; Juana Lopez Martin; Francisco Rivera de los Santos; Ignacio Ynfante Milá
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Nuclear cardiology: 2014 innovations and developments.

Authors:  John J Mahmarian; SuMin Chang; Faisal Nabi
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

8.  Safety and tolerability of regadenoson in 514 SPECT MPI patients with and without coronary artery disease and submaximal exercise heart rate response.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; M C Alraies; Manuel D Cerquiera; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Regadenoson pharmacologic rubidium-82 PET: a comparison of quantitative perfusion and function to dipyridamole.

Authors:  S James Cullom; James A Case; Staci A Courter; A Iain McGhie; Timothy M Bateman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Regadenoson versus dipyridamole: Evaluation of stress myocardial blood flow response on a CZT-SPECT camera.

Authors:  Quentin Brana; Frédérique Thibault; Maxime Courtehoux; Gilles Metrard; Maria Joao Ribeiro; Denis Angoulvant; Matthieu Bailly
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.