Literature DB >> 22200877

A clinician's personal view of assisted reproductive technology over 35 years.

John L Yovich1.   

Abstract

This invited presentation is intended to cover clinical developments in the evolution of assisted reproductive technology (ART), a process which was attempted during the 1940's and 50's and culminated in the first fruition in 1978. The first in vitro fertilisation (IVF) child ensued following the partnership by a scientist with a focussed ambition (Nobel laureate Robert Edwards) joining with the gynaecologist who introduced laparoscopy to Britain in the late 60's (Patrick Steptoe). My journey commenced in 1976 as a clinician who became immersed in the embryological and endocrinological science, whence most progress in ART emanates, and continued into a medical directorship position from which this personal view is documented. Several clinical advances have been important developments in the understanding and management of sub-fertile patients. However evolution of the various laboratory sciences has been the major key essential to meeting both the immediate as well as the long-term needs for human reproduction. The future requires a much better understanding and control over gametogenesis and a laboratory process which much more closely duplicates intrinsic reproductive physiology, avoiding gamete and embryo exposure to the atmosphere.This invited presentation is intended to cover clinical developments in the evolution of assisted reproductive technology (ART), a process which was attempted during the 1940's and 50's and culminated in the first fruition in 1978. The first in vitro fertilisation (IVF) child ensued following the partnership by a scientist with a focussed ambition (Nobel laureate Robert Edwards) joining with the gynaecologist who introduced laparoscopy to Britain in the late 60's (Patrick Steptoe). My journey commenced in 1976 as a clinician who became immersed in the embryological and endocrinological science, whence most progress in ART emanates, and continued into a medical directorship position from which this personal view is documented. Several clinical advances have been important developments in the understanding and management of sub-fertile patients. However evolution of the various laboratory sciences has been the major key essential to meeting both the immediate as well as the long-term needs for human reproduction. The future requires a much better understanding and control over gametogenesis and a laboratory process which much more closely duplicates intrinsic reproductive physiology, avoiding gamete and embryo exposure to the atmosphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22200877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biol        ISSN: 1642-431X            Impact factor:   2.376


  4 in total

1.  Ovarian stimulation with GnRH analogues.

Authors:  Ivan S Montenegro; Mariana Faller; Isabel C A de Almeida; Eduardo P Passos
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2014-06-27

2.  How should we deal with the barrage of new infertility treatments and innovative technologies?

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Sadeghi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2012-10

3.  Integrating surgical and clinical andrology is essential to improve the quality of care delivered to infertile couples.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ahmad Majzoub; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-09

4.  The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969-1978. V. The role of Jean Purdy reassessed.

Authors:  Martin H Johnson; Kay Elder
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2015-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.