Suzanne R Dash1, Graham C L Davey. 1. School of Psychology, The University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK. s.dash@sussex.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Negative mood is associated with increased worry levels, and also with deployment of a systematic information processing style. An experimental study assessed the potential role of systematic information processing in mediating the facilitative effect of negative mood on worry (e.g. Johnston & Davey, 1997). METHOD: Participants underwent appropriate vignette-based mood inductions (negative, neutral, and cognitive priming). Participants completed visual analogue scales measuring variables that reflect a raised processing sufficiency threshold and are known to increase systematic processing (responsibility, accountability, desire for control, and need for cognition), a measure of 'as many as can' worry stop rule deployment, and two measures of worry (the catastrophising interview and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire, PSWQ, Meyer, Miller, Metzger, & Borkovec, 1990). RESULTS: Experimentally-induced negative mood facilitated the endorsement of cognitive appraisals known to increase systematic as opposed to heuristic information processing. In addition, a meditational analysis showed that the systematic processing facilitators measure together with a measure of 'as many as can' worry stop rule deployment fully mediated the relationship between negative mood and a measure of worry frequency (PSWQ). LIMITATIONS: Future studies should develop and validate direct measures of systematic processing. CONCLUSIONS: Similarities and differences between systematic processing and chronic worrying as effortful forms of information processing are discussed, and a role for systematic processing as an information processing style relevant to understanding worrisome thought is described.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Negative mood is associated with increased worry levels, and also with deployment of a systematic information processing style. An experimental study assessed the potential role of systematic information processing in mediating the facilitative effect of negative mood on worry (e.g. Johnston & Davey, 1997). METHOD:Participants underwent appropriate vignette-based mood inductions (negative, neutral, and cognitive priming). Participants completed visual analogue scales measuring variables that reflect a raised processing sufficiency threshold and are known to increase systematic processing (responsibility, accountability, desire for control, and need for cognition), a measure of 'as many as can' worry stop rule deployment, and two measures of worry (the catastrophising interview and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire, PSWQ, Meyer, Miller, Metzger, & Borkovec, 1990). RESULTS: Experimentally-induced negative mood facilitated the endorsement of cognitive appraisals known to increase systematic as opposed to heuristic information processing. In addition, a meditational analysis showed that the systematic processing facilitators measure together with a measure of 'as many as can' worry stop rule deployment fully mediated the relationship between negative mood and a measure of worry frequency (PSWQ). LIMITATIONS: Future studies should develop and validate direct measures of systematic processing. CONCLUSIONS: Similarities and differences between systematic processing and chronic worrying as effortful forms of information processing are discussed, and a role for systematic processing as an information processing style relevant to understanding worrisome thought is described.