OBJECTIVE: To analyze change over 6 months in accelerometer-measured physical activity for participants with arthritis in a physical activity promotion trial. We tested the hypothesis that participants with the highest baseline functional capacity, regardless of their intervention status, experienced the greatest increases in physical activity levels at 6-month follow-up. DESIGN: At baseline, participants were interviewed in person, completed a 5-minute timed walk, and wore a biaxial accelerometer for 1 week, with a subsequent week of accelerometer wear at 6 months. We present data on the changes in accelerometer-measured physical activity across baseline function quartiles derived from participants' walking speed. Analyses were controlled for sociodemographic, health status, and seasonal covariates as well as exposure to the study's behavioral intervention. SETTING: A Midwest academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=226) with knee osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis currently enrolled in the Improving Motivation for Physical Activity in Persons With Arthritis Clinical Trial. INTERVENTION: Counseling by physical activity coaches versus control group physician advice to exercise. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in average daily counts between baseline and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Contrary to our hypothesis, and after controlling for other predictors of change, the lowest quartile function participants had the largest mean absolute and relative physical improvement over baseline, regardless of intervention group status. CONCLUSIONS: Participants at a higher risk of immanent mobility loss may have been more committed to improve lifestyle physical activity, reflecting the wisdom of targeting older adults at risk of mobility loss for physical activity behavior change interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze change over 6 months in accelerometer-measured physical activity for participants with arthritis in a physical activity promotion trial. We tested the hypothesis that participants with the highest baseline functional capacity, regardless of their intervention status, experienced the greatest increases in physical activity levels at 6-month follow-up. DESIGN: At baseline, participants were interviewed in person, completed a 5-minute timed walk, and wore a biaxial accelerometer for 1 week, with a subsequent week of accelerometer wear at 6 months. We present data on the changes in accelerometer-measured physical activity across baseline function quartiles derived from participants' walking speed. Analyses were controlled for sociodemographic, health status, and seasonal covariates as well as exposure to the study's behavioral intervention. SETTING: A Midwest academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=226) with knee osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis currently enrolled in the Improving Motivation for Physical Activity in Persons With Arthritis Clinical Trial. INTERVENTION: Counseling by physical activity coaches versus control group physician advice to exercise. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in average daily counts between baseline and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Contrary to our hypothesis, and after controlling for other predictors of change, the lowest quartile function participants had the largest mean absolute and relative physical improvement over baseline, regardless of intervention group status. CONCLUSIONS:Participants at a higher risk of immanent mobility loss may have been more committed to improve lifestyle physical activity, reflecting the wisdom of targeting older adults at risk of mobility loss for physical activity behavior change interventions.
Authors: Marco Pahor; Steven N Blair; Mark Espeland; Roger Fielding; Thomas M Gill; Jack M Guralnik; Evan C Hadley; Abby C King; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Cinzia Maraldi; Michael E Miller; Anne B Newman; Walter J Rejeski; Sergei Romashkan; Stephanie Studenski Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Daniel K White; Julie J Keysor; Michael P Lavalley; Cora E Lewis; James C Torner; Michael C Nevitt; David T Felson Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Joe Feinglass; Jing Song; Larry M Manheim; Pamela Semanik; Rowland W Chang; Dorothy D Dunlop Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-12-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: M A Mahieu; G E Ahn; J S Chmiel; D D Dunlop; I B Helenowski; P Semanik; J Song; S Yount; R W Chang; R Ramsey-Goldman Journal: Lupus Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: Elizabeth Vásquez; Ellen E Lee; Weihui Zhang; Xin Tu; David J Moore; María J Marquine; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Margaret E Gruen; Marcela Alfaro-Córdoba; Andrea E Thomson; Alicia C Worth; Ana-Maria Staicu; B Duncan X Lascelles Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nini H Jonkman; Marco Colpo; Jochen Klenk; Chris Todd; Trynke Hoekstra; Vieri Del Panta; Kilian Rapp; Natasja M van Schoor; Stefania Bandinelli; Martijn W Heymans; Dominique Mauger; Luca Cattelani; Michael D Denkinger; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Jorunn L Helbostad; Beatrix Vereijken; Andrea B Maier; Mirjam Pijnappels Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 3.921