Literature DB >> 22199905

Tris{2-[(2,6-dimethyl-phen-yl)amino]-eth-yl}amine.

Yurii S Moroz, Michael K Takase, Peter Müller, Elena V Rybak-Akimova.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(30)H(42)N(4), is an aryl-ated tris-(amino-eth-yl)amine derivative which was obtained by reducing the corresponding tris-amide with AlH(3). The asymmetric unit consists of one third of a C(3v)-symmetric mol-ecule with the tertiary N atom lying on a crystallographic threefold axis.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22199905      PMCID: PMC3239057          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811049397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the structural parameters of aryl­ated derivatives of tris­(amino­eth­yl)amine, see: Almesåker et al. (2009 ▶); Amoroso et al. (2009 ▶). For the synthesis and the structural parameters of metal complexes based on aryl­ated derivatives of tris­(amino­eth­yl)amine, see: Morton et al. (2000 ▶); Yandulov & Schrock (2005 ▶); Smythe et al. (2006 ▶); Reithofer et al. (2010 ▶); Almesåker et al. (2010 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C30H42N4 M = 458.68 Trigonal, a = 14.2880 (7) Å c = 22.3811 (11) Å V = 3956.9 (5) Å3 Z = 6 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.07 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.680, T max = 0.746 20390 measured reflections 2695 independent reflections 2330 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.031

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041 wR(F 2) = 0.113 S = 1.06 2695 reflections 109 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.42 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811049397/zl2430sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811049397/zl2430Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811049397/zl2430Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C30H42N4Dx = 1.155 Mg m3
Mr = 458.68Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Trigonal, R3Cell parameters from 9944 reflections
Hall symbol: -R 3θ = 2.5–30.6°
a = 14.2880 (7) ŵ = 0.07 mm1
c = 22.3811 (11) ÅT = 100 K
V = 3956.9 (5) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 60.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm
F(000) = 1500
Bruker Smart APEXII CCD diffractometer2695 independent reflections
Radiation source: ImuS micro-focus sealed tube2330 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Icoatech ImuS multilayer opticsRint = 0.031
Detector resolution: 8.3 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.6°, θmin = 1.9°
φ and ω scansh = −20→20
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2009)k = −20→20
Tmin = 0.680, Tmax = 0.746l = −31→31
20390 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.113H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0529P)2 + 4.1067P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2695 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
109 parametersΔρmax = 0.42 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.18 e Å3
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.58018 (7)0.22760 (7)0.11134 (4)0.01668 (18)
H1A0.58600.22330.06750.020*
H1B0.50950.22180.12000.020*
C20.58289 (8)0.13268 (7)0.13995 (4)0.01696 (18)
H2A0.51890.06420.12710.020*
H2B0.64850.13160.12680.020*
C30.58132 (7)0.05566 (7)0.23806 (4)0.01446 (17)
C40.48468 (7)−0.04409 (7)0.24161 (4)0.01604 (18)
C50.48377 (8)−0.12750 (8)0.27456 (4)0.01872 (19)
H50.4192−0.19560.27660.022*
C60.57519 (8)−0.11311 (8)0.30435 (4)0.01925 (19)
H60.5732−0.17080.32640.023*
C70.66954 (8)−0.01359 (8)0.30156 (4)0.01794 (18)
H70.7318−0.00320.32250.022*
C80.67430 (7)0.07137 (7)0.26845 (4)0.01593 (18)
C90.38314 (8)−0.06114 (8)0.21179 (5)0.0221 (2)
H9A0.3838−0.07940.16960.033*
H9B0.37910.00520.21460.033*
H9C0.3202−0.12030.23160.033*
C100.77793 (8)0.17807 (8)0.26578 (5)0.0238 (2)
H10A0.83510.17210.28660.036*
H10B0.76750.23380.28500.036*
H10C0.79880.19790.22400.036*
N10.66670.33330.13202 (6)0.0142 (2)
N20.58312 (7)0.14184 (6)0.20523 (4)0.01647 (17)
H2N0.6392 (12)0.2043 (12)0.2164 (6)0.024 (3)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0167 (4)0.0151 (4)0.0166 (4)0.0067 (3)−0.0036 (3)−0.0003 (3)
C20.0202 (4)0.0147 (4)0.0158 (4)0.0086 (3)−0.0020 (3)−0.0008 (3)
C30.0160 (4)0.0149 (4)0.0142 (4)0.0090 (3)−0.0006 (3)−0.0009 (3)
C40.0154 (4)0.0168 (4)0.0159 (4)0.0081 (3)−0.0001 (3)−0.0016 (3)
C50.0195 (4)0.0153 (4)0.0201 (4)0.0077 (3)0.0034 (3)0.0007 (3)
C60.0240 (4)0.0184 (4)0.0196 (4)0.0137 (4)0.0037 (3)0.0036 (3)
C70.0191 (4)0.0216 (4)0.0173 (4)0.0133 (4)−0.0003 (3)0.0011 (3)
C80.0155 (4)0.0164 (4)0.0160 (4)0.0081 (3)−0.0008 (3)−0.0007 (3)
C90.0149 (4)0.0237 (5)0.0238 (5)0.0068 (4)−0.0031 (3)−0.0002 (4)
C100.0176 (4)0.0201 (4)0.0286 (5)0.0055 (4)−0.0063 (4)0.0024 (4)
N10.0130 (3)0.0130 (3)0.0167 (6)0.00651 (17)0.0000.000
N20.0204 (4)0.0139 (3)0.0158 (4)0.0091 (3)−0.0030 (3)−0.0011 (3)
C1—N11.4686 (10)C6—C71.3879 (14)
C1—C21.5178 (12)C6—H60.9500
C1—H1A0.9900C7—C81.3946 (12)
C1—H1B0.9900C7—H70.9500
C2—N21.4667 (12)C8—C101.5043 (13)
C2—H2A0.9900C9—H9A0.9800
C2—H2B0.9900C9—H9B0.9800
C3—C41.4059 (12)C9—H9C0.9800
C3—C81.4069 (12)C10—H10A0.9800
C3—N21.4231 (11)C10—H10B0.9800
C4—C51.3961 (13)C10—H10C0.9800
C4—C91.5020 (13)N1—C1i1.4686 (10)
C5—C61.3872 (14)N1—C1ii1.4686 (10)
C5—H50.9500N2—H2N0.886 (15)
N1—C1—C2113.69 (7)C6—C7—C8121.01 (9)
N1—C1—H1A108.8C6—C7—H7119.5
C2—C1—H1A108.8C8—C7—H7119.5
N1—C1—H1B108.8C7—C8—C3119.13 (8)
C2—C1—H1B108.8C7—C8—C10119.87 (8)
H1A—C1—H1B107.7C3—C8—C10120.99 (8)
N2—C2—C1109.91 (7)C4—C9—H9A109.5
N2—C2—H2A109.7C4—C9—H9B109.5
C1—C2—H2A109.7H9A—C9—H9B109.5
N2—C2—H2B109.7C4—C9—H9C109.5
C1—C2—H2B109.7H9A—C9—H9C109.5
H2A—C2—H2B108.2H9B—C9—H9C109.5
C4—C3—C8120.33 (8)C8—C10—H10A109.5
C4—C3—N2119.34 (8)C8—C10—H10B109.5
C8—C3—N2120.30 (8)H10A—C10—H10B109.5
C5—C4—C3118.71 (8)C8—C10—H10C109.5
C5—C4—C9120.02 (8)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C3—C4—C9121.26 (8)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C6—C5—C4121.41 (9)C1i—N1—C1110.54 (6)
C6—C5—H5119.3C1i—N1—C1ii110.54 (6)
C4—C5—H5119.3C1—N1—C1ii110.54 (6)
C5—C6—C7119.38 (9)C3—N2—C2116.04 (7)
C5—C6—H6120.3C3—N2—H2N110.0 (9)
C7—C6—H6120.3C2—N2—H2N109.3 (9)
N1—C1—C2—N254.02 (10)C6—C7—C8—C10−179.46 (9)
C8—C3—C4—C5−1.51 (13)C4—C3—C8—C70.65 (13)
N2—C3—C4—C5−179.24 (8)N2—C3—C8—C7178.35 (8)
C8—C3—C4—C9177.26 (8)C4—C3—C8—C10−179.19 (9)
N2—C3—C4—C9−0.47 (13)N2—C3—C8—C10−1.48 (14)
C3—C4—C5—C61.07 (14)C2—C1—N1—C1i67.79 (13)
C9—C4—C5—C6−177.72 (9)C2—C1—N1—C1ii−169.49 (8)
C4—C5—C6—C70.25 (14)C4—C3—N2—C2−74.71 (11)
C5—C6—C7—C8−1.16 (14)C8—C3—N2—C2107.56 (10)
C6—C7—C8—C30.70 (14)C1—C2—N2—C3177.64 (7)
  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Studies relevant to catalytic reduction of dinitrogen to ammonia by molybdenum triamidoamine complexes.

Authors:  Dmitry V Yandulov; Richard R Schrock
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Synthesis of [(DPPNCH2CH2)3N]3- molybdenum complexes (DPP = 3,5-(2,5-Diisopropylpyrrolyl)2C6H3) and studies relevant to catalytic reduction of dinitrogen.

Authors:  Michael R Reithofer; Richard R Schrock; Peter Müller
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Synthesis of [(HIPTNCH2CH2)3N]V compounds (HIPT = 3,5-(2,4,6-i-Pr3C6H2)2C6H3) and an evaluation of vanadium for the reduction of dinitrogen to ammonia.

Authors:  Nathan C Smythe; Richard R Schrock; Peter Müller; Walter W Weare
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  The synthesis and coordination chemistry of a tris-8-aminoquinoline tripodal ligand.

Authors:  Angelo J Amoroso; Peter G Edwards; Sian T Howard; Benson M Kariuki; James C Knight; Liling Ooi; K M Abdul Malik; Lisa Stratford; A-R H Al-Sudani
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.390

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Models for potential dendritic nitric oxide donors: crystal structures of two 2-nitroanilino precursors and nitric oxide-release behavior of the nitrosated derivatives.

Authors:  Alec R Badour; Corey J Arnett-Butscher; Dillip K Mohanty; Philip J Squattrito; Kelly J Lambright; Kristin Kirschbaum
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 1.172

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.