Literature DB >> 22199770

2-(4-Chloro-phen-yl)acetamide.

Dong-Sheng Ma1, Pei-Jiang Liu, Shuai Zhang, Guang-Feng Hou.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(8)H(8)ClNO, the acetamide group is twisted out the benzene plane with a dihedral angle of 83.08 (1)°. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming layers parallel to the ab plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22199770      PMCID: PMC3238921          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811046836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For details of the nitrile hydrolysis of the same substrate (4-chlorobenzonitrile) by another method, see: Moorthy & Singhal (2005 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H8ClNO M = 169.60 Orthorhombic, a = 4.917 (2) Å b = 6.033 (4) Å c = 26.680 (12) Å V = 791.5 (7) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.42 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.29 × 0.22 × 0.07 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.887, T max = 0.970 7733 measured reflections 1807 independent reflections 1451 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.041

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.037 wR(F 2) = 0.083 S = 1.05 1807 reflections 108 parameters 2 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.17 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 704 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: −0.12 (8) Data collection: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku/MSC, 2002 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811046836/cv5191sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811046836/cv5191Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811046836/cv5191Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H8ClNOF(000) = 352
Mr = 169.60Dx = 1.423 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 5994 reflections
a = 4.917 (2) Åθ = 3.1–27.4°
b = 6.033 (4) ŵ = 0.42 mm1
c = 26.680 (12) ÅT = 293 K
V = 791.5 (7) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.29 × 0.22 × 0.07 mm
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer1807 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1451 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.041
ω scanθmax = 27.4°, θmin = 3.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.887, Tmax = 0.970k = −7→7
7733 measured reflectionsl = −34→33
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.083w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.036P)2 + 0.1017P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1807 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
108 parametersΔρmin = −0.17 e Å3
2 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 704 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: −0.12 (8)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.3632 (4)0.5073 (3)0.79843 (7)0.0335 (4)
C20.2527 (4)0.3677 (5)0.84087 (10)0.0603 (7)
H2A0.15600.46380.86390.072*
H2B0.12220.26330.82720.072*
C30.4640 (4)0.2408 (4)0.86973 (8)0.0429 (5)
C40.5575 (5)0.0374 (4)0.85279 (8)0.0487 (6)
H40.4907−0.01950.82280.058*
C50.7475 (5)−0.0822 (3)0.87944 (8)0.0451 (5)
H50.8079−0.21850.86760.054*
C60.8470 (4)0.0017 (4)0.92375 (8)0.0410 (5)
C70.7620 (5)0.2049 (4)0.94146 (8)0.0472 (6)
H70.83240.26220.97110.057*
C80.5697 (5)0.3221 (4)0.91430 (8)0.0487 (5)
H80.51000.45860.92620.058*
Cl11.08553 (13)−0.14906 (11)0.95804 (2)0.0605 (2)
N10.1788 (3)0.6234 (4)0.77353 (7)0.0441 (4)
H110.004 (2)0.613 (4)0.7811 (8)0.046 (6)*
H120.225 (5)0.714 (4)0.7485 (7)0.064 (8)*
O10.6073 (3)0.5149 (3)0.78808 (5)0.0435 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0263 (9)0.0376 (11)0.0367 (10)−0.0005 (9)0.0007 (8)−0.0027 (8)
C20.0291 (11)0.0819 (19)0.0699 (15)0.0050 (12)0.0050 (11)0.0347 (15)
C30.0310 (11)0.0528 (13)0.0449 (11)0.0000 (9)0.0035 (9)0.0145 (9)
C40.0493 (13)0.0554 (14)0.0416 (11)−0.0093 (12)−0.0077 (11)−0.0001 (10)
C50.0511 (13)0.0368 (12)0.0475 (12)0.0016 (9)0.0072 (11)−0.0041 (9)
C60.0381 (11)0.0444 (12)0.0406 (10)0.0018 (10)0.0046 (9)0.0071 (9)
C70.0514 (13)0.0514 (14)0.0387 (11)0.0009 (10)−0.0027 (10)−0.0056 (10)
C80.0503 (13)0.0433 (13)0.0525 (12)0.0118 (12)0.0069 (12)−0.0003 (10)
Cl10.0520 (3)0.0695 (4)0.0598 (3)0.0147 (3)−0.0015 (3)0.0194 (3)
N10.0243 (8)0.0587 (12)0.0494 (10)−0.0006 (8)0.0013 (8)0.0149 (10)
O10.0237 (6)0.0529 (9)0.0538 (8)−0.0038 (7)0.0051 (7)0.0046 (7)
C1—O11.232 (2)C5—C61.376 (3)
C1—N11.324 (3)C5—H50.9300
C1—C21.512 (3)C6—C71.379 (3)
C2—C31.503 (3)C6—Cl11.744 (2)
C2—H2A0.9700C7—C81.386 (3)
C2—H2B0.9700C7—H70.9300
C3—C41.386 (3)C8—H80.9300
C3—C81.387 (3)N1—H110.883 (10)
C4—C51.378 (3)N1—H120.892 (10)
C4—H40.9300
O1—C1—N1122.34 (19)C6—C5—C4119.5 (2)
O1—C1—C2122.57 (18)C6—C5—H5120.3
N1—C1—C2115.08 (17)C4—C5—H5120.3
C3—C2—C1114.78 (17)C5—C6—C7120.9 (2)
C3—C2—H2A108.6C5—C6—Cl1119.88 (18)
C1—C2—H2A108.6C7—C6—Cl1119.21 (17)
C3—C2—H2B108.6C6—C7—C8118.8 (2)
C1—C2—H2B108.6C6—C7—H7120.6
H2A—C2—H2B107.5C8—C7—H7120.6
C4—C3—C8117.9 (2)C7—C8—C3121.6 (2)
C4—C3—C2120.9 (2)C7—C8—H8119.2
C8—C3—C2121.2 (2)C3—C8—H8119.2
C5—C4—C3121.3 (2)C1—N1—H11120.9 (16)
C5—C4—H4119.3C1—N1—H12121.7 (18)
C3—C4—H4119.3H11—N1—H12117 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H11···O1i0.88 (1)2.05 (1)2.911 (2)165 (2)
N1—H12···O1ii0.89 (1)2.22 (1)3.064 (3)157 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H11⋯O1i0.88 (1)2.05 (1)2.911 (2)165 (2)
N1—H12⋯O1ii0.89 (1)2.22 (1)3.064 (3)157 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Facile and highly selective conversion of nitriles to amides via indirect acid-catalyzed hydration using TFA or AcOH-H2SO4.

Authors:  Jarugu Narasimha Moorthy; Nidhi Singhal
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 4.354

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Synthesis, crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 2-(perfluoro-phen-yl)acetamide in comparison with some related compounds.

Authors:  Anton P Novikov; Alexey A Bezdomnikov; Mikhail S Grigoriev; Konstantin E German
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2022-01-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.