Literature DB >> 22199696

Bis(3-methyl-anilinium) sulfate.

M Rademeyer1.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title salt, 2C(7)H(7)NH(3) (+)·SO(4) (2-), the cations inter-act with the oxyanions through strong charge-assisted N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22199696      PMCID: PMC3238843          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811045624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

The crystal structure of m-toluidinium nitrate (Rademeyer & Liles, 2010 ▶), and the structures of three related phosphate salts, namely bis­(m-toluidinium) dihydrogen diphosphate (Akriche & Rzaigui, 2000 ▶), tetra­kis­(m-toluidinium) cyclo­tetra­phosphate (Aloui et al., 2005 ▶), and hexa­kis­(m-toluidin­ium) cyclo­hexa­phosphate (Marouni et al., 2000 ▶), have been reported. For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶). For the most common coordination numbers for the sulfate anion, see: Chertanova & Pascard (1996 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

2C7H10NSO4 2− M = 312.23 Monoclinic, a = 17.2168 (8) Å b = 15.0298 (7) Å c = 6.1283 (3) Å β = 110.819 (3)° V = 1482.25 (12) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.24 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.23 × 0.22 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Oxford Xcalibur2 diffractometer 7603 measured reflections 2404 independent reflections 1615 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.024

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.038 wR(F 2) = 0.135 S = 1.04 2404 reflections 104 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.27 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006 ▶); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶) and WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811045624/bt5698sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811045624/bt5698Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811045624/bt5698Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
2C7H10N+·SO42F(000) = 664
Mr = 312.23Dx = 1.399 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 3393 reflections
a = 17.2168 (8) Åθ = 3.6–32.1°
b = 15.0298 (7) ŵ = 0.24 mm1
c = 6.1283 (3) ÅT = 293 K
β = 110.819 (3)°Block, colourless
V = 1482.25 (12) Å30.23 × 0.22 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4
Oxford Xcalibur2 diffractometer1615 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.024
graphiteθmax = 32.1°, θmin = 3.6°
ω–2θ scansh = −24→24
7603 measured reflectionsk = −21→20
2404 independent reflectionsl = −8→8
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.135H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0795P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2404 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.017
104 parametersΔρmax = 0.31 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.27 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.11567 (8)0.10113 (10)−0.1357 (2)0.0333 (3)
H1A0.10020.1171−0.01740.053 (6)*
H1B0.08680.1321−0.26240.057 (6)*
H1C0.10610.0433−0.16410.054 (6)*
C10.20457 (9)0.11906 (9)−0.0750 (3)0.0280 (3)
C20.23035 (10)0.16302 (11)−0.2339 (3)0.0361 (4)
H20.19280.1786−0.38010.043 (5)*
C30.31438 (10)0.18371 (12)−0.1699 (3)0.0417 (4)
H30.33320.2138−0.27410.081 (7)*
C40.36970 (10)0.15994 (11)0.0457 (3)0.0385 (4)
H40.42550.17500.08630.066 (7)*
C50.34354 (9)0.11370 (10)0.2051 (3)0.0325 (3)
C60.25958 (9)0.09370 (10)0.1415 (3)0.0305 (3)
H60.24040.06330.24450.038 (5)*
C70.40487 (11)0.08698 (13)0.4386 (3)0.0490 (5)
H7A0.37580.06150.53130.073*
H7B0.43530.13840.51650.073*
H7C0.44280.04390.41740.073*
S10.00000.13146 (3)0.25000.02700 (17)
O10.07354 (8)0.07574 (8)0.2846 (2)0.0472 (3)
O2−0.01386 (7)0.18692 (7)0.04230 (19)0.0432 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0271 (6)0.0429 (8)0.0312 (7)−0.0030 (6)0.0119 (5)−0.0038 (6)
C10.0257 (7)0.0288 (7)0.0318 (7)0.0002 (6)0.0130 (6)−0.0036 (6)
C20.0374 (8)0.0407 (9)0.0325 (9)0.0031 (7)0.0154 (7)0.0034 (7)
C30.0415 (9)0.0435 (10)0.0493 (10)−0.0004 (7)0.0274 (8)0.0087 (7)
C40.0282 (7)0.0360 (8)0.0545 (10)0.0014 (6)0.0186 (7)0.0015 (7)
C50.0271 (7)0.0273 (7)0.0408 (9)0.0052 (6)0.0093 (6)0.0007 (6)
C60.0296 (7)0.0293 (7)0.0338 (8)0.0000 (6)0.0127 (6)0.0040 (6)
C70.0365 (9)0.0502 (11)0.0515 (12)0.0048 (8)0.0049 (8)0.0068 (8)
S10.0270 (3)0.0297 (3)0.0256 (3)0.0000.0108 (2)0.000
O10.0413 (7)0.0497 (7)0.0526 (8)0.0160 (6)0.0190 (6)−0.0040 (6)
O20.0554 (8)0.0420 (7)0.0309 (6)−0.0104 (6)0.0137 (5)0.0067 (5)
N1—C11.4659 (17)C4—H40.9299
N1—H1A0.8899C5—C61.390 (2)
N1—H1B0.8901C5—C71.500 (2)
N1—H1C0.8899C6—H60.9299
C1—C21.374 (2)C7—H7A0.9600
C1—C61.382 (2)C7—H7B0.9600
C2—C31.393 (2)C7—H7C0.9600
C2—H20.9300S1—O2i1.4684 (11)
C3—C41.373 (2)S1—O21.4684 (11)
C3—H30.9300S1—O1i1.4692 (12)
C4—C51.397 (2)S1—O11.4692 (12)
C1—N1—H1A109.4C6—C5—C4118.22 (15)
C1—N1—H1B109.5C6—C5—C7121.27 (15)
H1A—N1—H1B109.5C4—C5—C7120.50 (15)
C1—N1—H1C109.5C1—C6—C5119.97 (14)
H1A—N1—H1C109.5C1—C6—H6120.0
H1B—N1—H1C109.5C5—C6—H6120.0
C2—C1—C6121.94 (14)C5—C7—H7A109.5
C2—C1—N1118.66 (14)C5—C7—H7B109.5
C6—C1—N1119.37 (13)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C1—C2—C3118.21 (15)C5—C7—H7C109.5
C1—C2—H2121.0H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C2—H2120.8H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C4—C3—C2120.56 (15)O2i—S1—O2110.82 (9)
C4—C3—H3119.7O2i—S1—O1i108.34 (7)
C2—C3—H3119.8O2—S1—O1i109.42 (7)
C3—C4—C5121.08 (15)O2i—S1—O1109.42 (7)
C3—C4—H4119.4O2—S1—O1108.34 (7)
C5—C4—H4119.5O1i—S1—O1110.51 (11)
C6—C1—C2—C3−1.3 (2)C3—C4—C5—C7179.07 (17)
N1—C1—C2—C3176.82 (14)C2—C1—C6—C50.9 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C40.5 (3)N1—C1—C6—C5−177.23 (13)
C2—C3—C4—C50.7 (3)C4—C5—C6—C10.3 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C6−1.2 (3)C7—C5—C6—C1−179.89 (15)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O10.892.152.9384 (19)147.
N1—H1A···O20.892.373.0913 (18)139.
N1—H1B···O2ii0.891.912.7997 (18)173.
N1—H1C···O1iii0.891.872.7531 (19)173.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O10.892.152.9384 (19)147
N1—H1A⋯O20.892.373.0913 (18)139
N1—H1B⋯O2i0.891.912.7997 (18)173
N1—H1C⋯O1ii0.891.872.7531 (19)173

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  4 in total

1.  (m-CH3C6H4NH3)6P6O18

Authors: 
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.172

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  3-Methyl-anilinium nitrate.

Authors:  Melanie Rademeyer; David C Liles
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-06-16

4.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.