Literature DB >> 22199171

Cerebellar theta burst stimulation impairs eyeblink classical conditioning.

Britt S Hoffland1, Matteo Bologna, Panagiotis Kassavetis, James T H Teo, John C Rothwell, Christopher H Yeo, Bart P van de Warrenburg, Mark J Edwards.   

Abstract

Theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have after-effects on excitability of motor areas thought to be due to LTP- and LTD-like processes at cortical synapses. The present experiments ask whether, despite the low intensities of stimulation used and the anatomy of the posterior fossa, TBS can also influence the cerebellum. Acquisition and retention of eyeblink classical conditioning (EBCC) was examined in 30 healthy volunteers after continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the right cerebellar hemisphere. In subjects who received cerebellar cTBS, conditioned responses were fewer and their onsets were earlier (in the last half of the acquisition blocks) than those from control subjects. There was, however, no effect of cerebellar cTBS on the re-acquisition of EBCC in another session of EBCC 7–10 days later. There was also no effect of cerebellar cTBS on the re-acquisition of EBCC in subjects not naïve to EBCC when the stimulation was delivered immediately before a re-acquisition session. Control experiments verified that suppressive effects of cTBS on EBCC were not due to changes in motor cortical excitability or sensory disturbance caused by cTBS. Based on previous EBCC studies in various cerebellar pathologies, our data are compatible with the hypothesis that cerebellar cTBS has a focal cerebellar cortical effect, and are broadly in line with data from studies of EBCC in various animal models. These results confirm that cerebellar TBS has measurable effects on the function of the cerebellum, and indicate it is a useful non-invasive technique with which to explore cerebellar physiology and function in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22199171      PMCID: PMC3381317          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.218537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  30 in total

Review 1.  Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention.

Authors:  Kimberly M Christian; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Cerebellar LTD and learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  S K E Koekkoek; H C Hulscher; B R Dortland; R A Hensbroek; Y Elgersma; T J H Ruigrok; C I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Interference of left and right cerebellar rTMS with procedural learning.

Authors:  Sara Torriero; Massimiliano Oliveri; Giacomo Koch; Carlo Caltagirone; Laura Petrosini
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Time and tide in cerebellar memory formation.

Authors:  Chris I De Zeeuw; Christopher H Yeo
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  The effect of rTMS over the cerebellum in normal human volunteers on peg-board movement performance.

Authors:  R C Miall; L O D Christensen
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  S P Perrett; B P Ruiz; M D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Eyeblink conditioning in patients with hereditary ataxia: a one-year follow-up study.

Authors:  D Timmann; M Gerwig; M Frings; M Maschke; F P Kolb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Adaptive regulation of neuronal excitability by a voltage-independent potassium conductance.

Authors:  S G Brickley; V Revilla; S G Cull-Candy; W Wisden; M Farrant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Recoverable and nonrecoverable deficits in conditioned responses after cerebellar cortical lesions.

Authors:  J A Harvey; J P Welsh; C H Yeo; A G Romano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  The role of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of discrete behavioral responses.

Authors:  R F Thompson; J E Steinmetz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Distributed Circuit Plasticity: New Clues for the Cerebellar Mechanisms of Learning.

Authors:  Egidio D'Angelo; Lisa Mapelli; Claudia Casellato; Jesus A Garrido; Niceto Luque; Jessica Monaco; Francesca Prestori; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Eduardo Ros
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Cerebellar contributions to verbal working memory.

Authors:  Simon P Tomlinson; Nick J Davis; Helen M Morgan; R Martyn Bracewell
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation--a consensus paper.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; G P Argyropoulos; A Boehringer; P Celnik; M J Edwards; R Ferrucci; J M Galea; S J Groiss; K Hiraoka; P Kassavetis; E Lesage; M Manto; R C Miall; A Priori; A Sadnicka; Y Ugawa; U Ziemann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Reply: A single session of cerebellar theta burst stimulation does not alter writing performance in writer's cramp.

Authors:  Sabine Meunier; Traian Popa; Cécile Hubsch; Emmanuel Roze; Asha Kishore
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  A single session of cerebellar theta burst stimulation does not alter writing performance in writer's cramp.

Authors:  Manon W Linssen; Judith van Gaalen; Moniek A M Munneke; Britt S Hoffland; Wouter Hulstijn; Bart P C van de Warrenburg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Current Opinions and Areas of Consensus on the Role of the Cerebellum in Dystonia.

Authors:  Vikram G Shakkottai; Amit Batla; Kailash Bhatia; William T Dauer; Christian Dresel; Martin Niethammer; David Eidelberg; Robert S Raike; Yoland Smith; H A Jinnah; Ellen J Hess; Sabine Meunier; Mark Hallett; Rachel Fremont; Kamran Khodakhah; Mark S LeDoux; Traian Popa; Cécile Gallea; Stéphane Lehericy; Andreea C Bostan; Peter L Strick
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 7.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Cerebellar tDCS dissociates the timing of perceptual decisions from perceptual change in speech.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; James Bonaiuto; Sven Bestmann; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The role of the trigeminal sensory nuclear complex in the pathophysiology of craniocervical dystonia.

Authors:  Lynley Bradnam; Christine Barry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Children with autism spectrum disorders show abnormal conditioned response timing on delay, but not trace, eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  J Oristaglio; S Hyman West; M Ghaffari; M S Lech; B R Verma; J A Harvey; J P Welsh; R P Malone
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.