Literature DB >> 2219892

Barriers to prescribing the Copper T 380A intrauterine device by physicians.

C H Kooiker1, F D Scutchfield.   

Abstract

From a questionnaire sent to all obstetricians and gynecologists and all family and general practitioners in San Diego County, California, regarding the Copper T 380A intrauterine device, substantial barriers to prescribing it were identified. Of all physicians responding, 40% reported that they were not recommending the Copper T 380A to anyone, the single most common reason given being concern about medical liability. A lack of knowledge about the new device, a lack of intrauterine device insertion skills, and certain medical practice settings were also important barriers to prescribing it. The new intrauterine device is considered in the context of innovation-diffusion theory. Substantial amounts of education and training and improvement in the medical-legal climate are needed before current barriers to prescribing the new device are removed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Attitude; Behavior; California; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage; Data Collection; Delivery Of Health Care; Developed Countries; Distributional Activities; Family Planning; Health; Health Personnel; Iud; Iud, Copper Releasing; Knowledge; Method Acceptability; North America; Northern America; Obstacles; Organization And Administration; Physicians; Prescriptions; Program Activities; Programs; Psychological Factors; Recommendations; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Studies; Surveys; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2219892      PMCID: PMC1002531     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  8 in total

1.  The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?

Authors:  J D Forrest
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: recent developments.

Authors:  D A Grimes
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 3.  Effectiveness of IUDs: a review.

Authors:  I Sivin; F Schmidt
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Tubal infertility and the intrauterine device.

Authors:  D W Cramer; I Schiff; S C Schoenbaum; M Gibson; S Belisle; B Albrecht; R J Stillman; M J Berger; E Wilson; B V Stadel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Primary tubal infertility in relation to the use of an intrauterine device.

Authors:  J R Daling; N S Weiss; B J Metch; W H Chow; R M Soderstrom; D E Moore; L R Spadoni; B V Stadel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Four years of experience with the TCu 380A intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  I Sivin; H J Tatum
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Association between intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  R T Burkman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease revisited: new results from the Women's Health Study.

Authors:  N C Lee; G L Rubin; R Borucki
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 7.661

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  The power of information and contraceptive choice in a family planning setting in Mexico.

Authors:  E C Lazcano Ponce; N L Sloan; B Winikoff; A Langer; C Coggins; A Heimburger; C J Conde-Glez; J Salmeron
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Determinants of contraceptive availability at medical facilities in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Cope; Elizabeth M Yano; Martin L Lee; Donna L Washington
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Evidence-based selection of candidates for the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD).

Authors:  Lisa S Callegari; Blair G Darney; Emily M Godfrey; Olivia Sementi; Rebecca Dunsmoor-Su; Sarah W Prager
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Factors associated with long-acting reversible contraception use among women Veterans in the ECUUN study.

Authors:  Angela F Koenig; Sonya Borrero; Xinhua Zhao; Lisa Callegari; Maria K Mor; Sarita Sonalkar
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  The evidence is in. Why are IUDs still out?: family physicians' perceptions of risk and indications.

Authors:  Esther Stubbs; Adrianna Schamp
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Evaluation of midwifery students' competency in providing intrauterine device services using objective structured clinical examination.

Authors:  Fatemeh Erfanian; Talaat Khadivzadeh
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2011

7.  The comparison the effect of training by means of simulation and oral method on midwives' skill in management of shoulder dystocia.

Authors:  Masoumeh Kordi; Fatemeh Erfanian; Farzaneh Rashidi Fakari; Fatemeh Dastfan; Keivan Shariati Nejad
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2017-06-05

8.  Medical student simulation training in intrauterine contraception insertion and removal: an intervention to improve comfort, skill, and attitudes.

Authors:  Deborah Bartz; Amy Paris; Rie Maurer; Roxane Gardner; Natasha Johnson
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2016-02-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.