Literature DB >> 22198900

Quality of in-hospital cardiac arrest calls: a prospective observational study.

Naheed Akhtar1, Richard A Field, Liz Greenwood, Robin P Davies, Sarah Woolley, Matthew W Cooke, Gavin D Perkins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the quality and diagnostic accuracy of in-hospital adult clinical emergency calls.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Three National Health Service acute hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients sustaining an in-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) or medical emergency (ME) which required activation of the hospital resuscitation team between 1 December 2009 and 30 April 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Emergency call duration, emergency team dispatch time, diagnostic accuracy of emergency call (sensitivity/specificity), thematic analysis of emergency call, patient outcomes (return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge).
RESULTS: There were 426 adult resuscitation team activations. There was variability in emergency call duration ranging from 6 to 92 s (median 15 s; IQR 12-19). The sensitivity and specificity of calls for a CA was 91% (86.4-94.6%) and 62% (55.5-68.7%), respectively. Sensitivity did not change with call duration but specificity increased from 38% (25.8-51.0%) for the shortest calls to 82% (69.5-89.6%) for longer calls; p=0.03. The return of spontaneous circulation rate was 38% for calls when the patient was confirmed as in CA upon arrival of the resuscitation team. Survival to hospital discharge rates was higher in patients with shorter call durations (26%) than calls with longer call duration (12%); p=0.028. Five themes emerged identifying reasons for the increased call delay.
CONCLUSION: There is variability in duration and diagnostic accuracy of in-hospital emergency calls. This is associated with delayed activation of the emergency response. The attempt to differentiate between ME and CA is a source of confusion. A single clinical emergency response for CA and ME calls may provide a more focused and timely emergency response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22198900     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  4 in total

1.  [Deployment of the in-hospital emergency team in a tertiary care university hospital : Data analysis for the time period 2013-2016 in North-Rhine/Westphalia].

Authors:  J Schmitz; S Kerkhoff; D Sander; G Schulz; T Warnecke; J Hinkelbein
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  The System-Wide Effect of Real-Time Audiovisual Feedback and Postevent Debriefing for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Keith Couper; Peter K Kimani; Benjamin S Abella; Mehboob Chilwan; Matthew W Cooke; Robin P Davies; Richard A Field; Fang Gao; Sarah Quinton; Nigel Stallard; Sarah Woolley; Gavin D Perkins
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  European standard internal telephone number 2222 for in-hospital emergency calls: A national survey in all French military training hospitals.

Authors:  Nicolas Py; Bertrand Prunet; Antoine Lamblin; Jean Pierre Tourtier; Guillaume de Saint Maurice; Frédéric Adnet; Julien Pottecher; Alain Cariou; David K Whitaker; Katia Aymart; Pierre Pasquier
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  In-hospital cardiac arrest call procedures and delays of the cardiac arrest team: A nationwide study.

Authors:  Julie Lyngholm Madsen; Kasper Glerup Lauridsen; Bo Løfgren
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-02-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.