OBJECTIVES: To assess the power of multi-detector row computerized tomography (MDCT) in daily routine as a basic staging procedure for the decision on local treatment of patients with bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 276 patients who had undergone radical cystectomy between 2004 and 2008 and correlated the MDCT findings with pathological findings, number of removed lymph nodes and type of urinary diversion. RESULTS: Accuracy of MDCT in predicting pathological tumour stage was 49% (kappa coefficient, 0.23; P < 0.001). Overstaging occurred in 23.4%, and understaging occurred in 24.7%. Accuracy in predicting lymph node metastases was 54% (kappa coefficient, 0.04; P = 0.297). Overstaging and understaging occurred in 8.3 and 29.4%, respectively. Significantly more ileal conduits were performed in patients with high postoperative pathological tumour stages (P = 0.04) and positive lymph nodes (P = 0.013). In contrast, there was no correlation between preoperative CT tumour/nodal stage and the number of removed lymph nodes (P = 0.44 and P = 0.732, respectively), and between preoperative tumour stage and type of urinary diversion (P = 0.126). CONCLUSIONS: MDCT as a preoperative staging procedure has a low accuracy in predicting the correct tumour and nodal stage, and therefore, it has little impact on decision-making for local treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer during radical cystectomy.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the power of multi-detector row computerized tomography (MDCT) in daily routine as a basic staging procedure for the decision on local treatment of patients with bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 276 patients who had undergone radical cystectomy between 2004 and 2008 and correlated the MDCT findings with pathological findings, number of removed lymph nodes and type of urinary diversion. RESULTS: Accuracy of MDCT in predicting pathological tumour stage was 49% (kappa coefficient, 0.23; P < 0.001). Overstaging occurred in 23.4%, and understaging occurred in 24.7%. Accuracy in predicting lymph node metastases was 54% (kappa coefficient, 0.04; P = 0.297). Overstaging and understaging occurred in 8.3 and 29.4%, respectively. Significantly more ileal conduits were performed in patients with high postoperative pathological tumour stages (P = 0.04) and positive lymph nodes (P = 0.013). In contrast, there was no correlation between preoperative CT tumour/nodal stage and the number of removed lymph nodes (P = 0.44 and P = 0.732, respectively), and between preoperative tumour stage and type of urinary diversion (P = 0.126). CONCLUSIONS: MDCT as a preoperative staging procedure has a low accuracy in predicting the correct tumour and nodal stage, and therefore, it has little impact on decision-making for local treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer during radical cystectomy.
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Taylor Murray; Elizabeth Ward; Alicia Samuels; Ram C Tiwari; Asma Ghafoor; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Arnulf Stenzl; Nigel C Cowan; Maria De Santis; Markus A Kuczyk; Axel S Merseburger; Maria José Ribal; Amir Sherif; J Alfred Witjes Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Kang Su Cho; Joo Wan Seo; Sung Jin Park; Young Hoon Lee; Young Deuk Choi; Nam Hoon Cho; Seung Choul Yang; Sung Joon Hong Journal: Urol Int Date: 2009-05-11 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Alexander Karl; Peter R Carroll; Jürgen E Gschwend; Ruth Knüchel; Francesco Montorsi; Christian G Stief; Urs E Studer Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-01-13 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Martijn P A Starmans; Li Shen Ho; Fokko Smits; Nick Beije; Inge de Kruijff; Joep J de Jong; Diederik M Somford; Egbert R Boevé; Ed Te Slaa; Evelyne C C Cauberg; Sjoerd Klaver; Antoine G van der Heijden; Carl J Wijburg; Addy C M van de Luijtgaarden; Harm H E van Melick; Ella Cauffman; Peter de Vries; Rens Jacobs; Wiro J Niessen; Jacob J Visser; Stefan Klein; Joost L Boormans; Astrid A M van der Veldt Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-04-30
Authors: M Grabbert; T Grimm; A Buchner; A Kretschmer; M Apfelbeck; G Schulz; F Jokisch; B-S Schneevoigt; C G Stief; A Karl Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: William P Parker; Philip L Ho; Stephen A Boorjian; Jonathan J Melquist; Prabin Thapa; Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein; Igor Frank; Ashish M Kamat; Eugene K Lee Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Michał Frączek; Hubert Kamecki; Anna Kamecka; Roman Sosnowski; Katarzyna Sklinda; Marcin Czarniecki; Leszek Królicki; Jerzy Walecki Journal: Transl Androl Urol Date: 2018-10
Authors: Valeria Panebianco; Yoshifumi Narumi; Ersan Altun; Bernard H Bochner; Jason A Efstathiou; Shaista Hafeez; Robert Huddart; Steve Kennish; Seth Lerner; Rodolfo Montironi; Valdair F Muglia; Georg Salomon; Stephen Thomas; Hebert Alberto Vargas; J Alfred Witjes; Mitsuru Takeuchi; Jelle Barentsz; James W F Catto Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 20.096