BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often unsuccessful in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy. Augmented enteroscopy allows deep insertion into the small bowel and can be useful in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy. The aim of this study was to compare single balloon assisted ERCP (SBE-ERCP) and spiral assisted ERCP (SE-ERCP) in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic yield, procedure time, and complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy who underwent SBE-ERCP or SE-ERCP between October 2007 and March 2011. Diagnostic yield was defined as successful duct cannulation. Therapeutic yield was defined as the ability to successfully carry out endoscopic therapy in those cannulated. Procedure time and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy underwent 54 ERCP procedures. The overall diagnostic yield was 44.4% with no significant difference between the diagnostic yield of SBE-ERCP (48.3%) and SE-ERCP (40%). The diagnostic yield was lower in patients with gastric by-pass (38.9%) compared with other types of Roux-en-Y anatomy (47.2%) but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.772). The overall therapeutic yield was 93.8%, with a therapeutic yield of 100% for SBE-ERCP and 87.5% for SE-ERCP (P = 1.0). There was one perforation during SBE-ERCP, giving a complication rate of 3.5%. The mean procedure time did not differ between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic and therapeutic yields are similar with SBE-ERCP and SE-ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy with no significant difference in procedure time or complication rates.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often unsuccessful in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy. Augmented enteroscopy allows deep insertion into the small bowel and can be useful in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy. The aim of this study was to compare single balloon assisted ERCP (SBE-ERCP) and spiral assisted ERCP (SE-ERCP) in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic yield, procedure time, and complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy who underwent SBE-ERCP or SE-ERCP between October 2007 and March 2011. Diagnostic yield was defined as successful duct cannulation. Therapeutic yield was defined as the ability to successfully carry out endoscopic therapy in those cannulated. Procedure time and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy underwent 54 ERCP procedures. The overall diagnostic yield was 44.4% with no significant difference between the diagnostic yield of SBE-ERCP (48.3%) and SE-ERCP (40%). The diagnostic yield was lower in patients with gastric by-pass (38.9%) compared with other types of Roux-en-Y anatomy (47.2%) but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.772). The overall therapeutic yield was 93.8%, with a therapeutic yield of 100% for SBE-ERCP and 87.5% for SE-ERCP (P = 1.0). There was one perforation during SBE-ERCP, giving a complication rate of 3.5%. The mean procedure time did not differ between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic and therapeutic yields are similar with SBE-ERCP and SE-ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy with no significant difference in procedure time or complication rates.
Authors: P B Cotton; G Lehman; J Vennes; J E Geenen; R C Russell; W C Meyers; C Liguory; N Nickl Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 1991 May-Jun Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Mouen A Khashab; Anne Marie Lennon; Kerry B Dunbar; Vikesh K Singh; Vinay Chandrasekhara; Samuel Giday; Marcia I Canto; Jonathan M Buscaglia; Sumit Kapoor; Eun Ji Shin; Anthony N Kalloo; Patrick I Okolo Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Andrew Y Wang; Bryan G Sauer; Brian W Behm; Madhuri Ramanath; Dawn G Cox; Kristi L Ellen; Vanessa M Shami; Michel Kahaleh Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: A Saleem; T H Baron; C J Gostout; M D Topazian; M J Levy; B T Petersen; L M Wong Kee Song Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Ali A Siddiqui; Adib Chaaya; Corbett Shelton; Jennifer Marmion; Thomas E Kowalski; David E Loren; Stephen J Heller; Oleh Haluszka; Douglas G Adler; Jeffrey L Tokar Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Mohammed S Alqahtani; Shadi A Alshammary; Enas M Alqahtani; Shoukat A Bojal; Amal Alaidh; Gelu Osian Journal: Int J Surg Case Rep Date: 2016-02-12