Literature DB >> 22198651

Functional outcomes in elderly patients with acetabular fractures treated with minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous fixation.

Joshua L Gary1, Michael VanHal, Steven D Gibbons, Charles M Reinert, Adam J Starr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To present the functional outcomes of elderly patients treated with percutaneous acetabular surgery and compare them with those treated with traditional open reduction and internal fixation in previously published series.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: University level I trauma center. PATIENTS: All patients aged 60 and older treated with percutaneous screw fixation for acetabular fractures from 1994 to 2007 were included. Seventy-nine consecutive patients were identified. Thirty-six patients died before functional outcomes were obtained, leaving 43 patients and fractures in our study group. Functional outcomes were obtained in 35 of 43 (81.3%) patients at an average of 6.8 years after the index surgery. INTERVENTION: Minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous fixation of acetabular fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Short musculoskeletal functional assessment and Harris Hip Score.
RESULTS: One-year mortality was 13.9% (11 of 79). Average short musculoskeletal functional assessment dysfunction and bother indices were 23.3 and 21.3, respectively, in 24 patients who maintained their native hip. When compared with Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment data from 2 other series of patients treated with formal open reduction and internal fixation, no differences existed in the dysfunction (P = 0.49) or bother (P = 0.55) indices. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty occurred in 11 of 36 patients (30.6%). Average Harris Hip Scores in patients with their native hip was 77 (range, 33-100). In the 11 patients converted to total hip arthroplasty, average Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment dysfunction and bother indices were 24.3 and 23.9, respectively. No differences were found in the dysfunction (P = 0.93) or bother (P = 0.16) indices when compared with patients converted from open reduction and internal fixation to total hip arthroplasty. Average Harris Hip Score in patients converted to total hip arthroplasty was 83 (range, 68-92), and this was not significantly different from the best scores reported with acute total hip arthroplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcomes and rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty of acetabular fractures in elderly patients treated with percutaneous reduction and fixation show no significant differences when compared with published series of patients treated with formal open reduction and internal fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22198651     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31823836d2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  15 in total

1.  Screw placement in percutaneous acetabular surgery: gender differences of anatomical landmarks in a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Thomas Dienstknecht; Michael Müller; Richard Sellei; Michael Nerlich; Franz Josef Müller; Bernd Fuechtmeier; Arne Berner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Fracture characteristics and outcomes of acetabular fracture management with minimally invasive approach and percutaneous fixation.

Authors:  Ekansh Debuka; Gunasekaran Kumar; Neel Dalal; Sanjay Kalra
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-01-29

3.  Quality of life from return to work and sports activities to sexual dysfunction after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Andrea Stefano Monteleone; Pietro Feltri; Mauro Natale Molina; Jochen Müller; Giuseppe Filardo; Christian Candrian
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Immediate full weight bearing after pelvic percutaneous fixation by screw for simple acetabular and pelvic ring fractures in patients older than sixty five years.

Authors:  Rayane Benhenneda; Hoel Letissier; Frédéric Dubrana; Rémi Di Francia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 5.  Fragility Fractures of the Acetabulum: Current Concepts for Improving Patients' Outcomes.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toro; Adriano Braile; Annalisa De Cicco; Raffaele Pezzella; Francesco Ascione; Antonio Benedetto Cecere; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 1.033

6.  Short-term results of percutaneous treatment of acetabular fractures: functional outcomes, radiographic assessment and complications.

Authors:  Anthony E Bozzio; Christopher R Johnson; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A Guide to Improving the Care of Patients with Fragility Fractures, Edition 2.

Authors:  Simon C Mears; Stephen L Kates
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-06

8.  Management of high-energy acetabular fractures in the elderly individuals: a current review.

Authors:  Brian W Hill; Julie A Switzer; Peter A Cole
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

9.  Acetabulum fractures in elderly: A systematic review of fracture pattern and treatment.

Authors:  Tarun Goyal; Gaganpreet Singh; Sujit Kumar Tripathy; Alexander Schuh; Lokesh A Veerappa; Ramesh Kumar Sen
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-09-12

10.  Treatment modalities and outcomes following acetabular fractures in the elderly: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brian P McCormick; Joseph Serino; Sebastian Orman; Alex R Webb; David X Wang; Amin Mohamadi; Sharri Mortensen; Michael J Weaver; Arvind Von Keudell
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.