Literature DB >> 22198268

Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the staging of locally advanced cervical cancer: is it a feasible procedure at a peripheral center?

Virginia Benito1, Amina Lubrano, Octavio Arencibia, Miguel Andújar, Beatriz Pinar, Norberto Medina, Juan Miguel Falcón, Orlando Falcón.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study's aim was to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy at a peripheral center for the staging of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).
METHODS: From March 2009 to January 2011, 30 patients with LACC underwent laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy. All patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy tailored according to the staging results. Data on demographics, pathologic findings, surgery, complications, and disease status at follow-up are presented.
RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 47.6 years (range, 28-67 years). The mean body mass index was 26.3 (range, 19.1-35.6). Mean operative time was 118.7 minutes (range, 77-195 minutes) with an average of 14.2 lymph nodes removed (range, 5-34). Intraoperative complications were a lumbar artery injury and a bowel injury. No postoperative complications occurred. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.9 days (range, 1-6 days). Pathological examination revealed that 26.7% (8/30) of patients had metastatic disease in para-aortic lymph nodes. Two patients with disease at the para-aortic level died 5 and 12 months after diagnosis; both of them developed pulmonary and hepatic metastases. The rest of the patients were free of disease, after completion of the treatment, during a mean follow-up time of 15.6 months (range, 5-27 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy is a feasible procedure, even at peripheral centers, that is useful to identify patients with LACC and para-aortic disease and to tailor their treatment. Gynecologic oncologists are encouraged to learn this procedure and offer it to their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22198268     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31823c241b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of single-port laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Delphine Hudry; Francesco Cannone; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Max Buttarelli; Camille Jauffret; Elisabeth Chéreau; Eric Lambaudie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?

Authors:  Fatih Gucer; Selim Misirlioglu; Nuri Ceydeli; Cagatay Taskiran
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-03-02

Review 3.  Conventional Laparoscopy versus Robotic-Assisted Aortic Lymph-Nodal Staging for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mariano Catello Di Donna; Vincenzo Giallombardo; Giuseppina Lo Balbo; Giuseppe Cucinella; Giulio Sozzi; Vito Andrea Capozzi; Antonino Abbate; Antonio Simone Laganà; Simone Garzon; Vito Chiantera
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Janelle Pakish; Pamela T Soliman; Michael Frumovitz; Shannon N Westin; Kathleen M Schmeler; Ricardo Dos Reis; Mark F Munsell; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Surgical Outcomes of Transperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Compared With Extraperitoneal Approach in Gynecologic Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kun-Peng Li; Xian-Zhong Deng; Tao Wu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.