Literature DB >> 22198252

Screening for disease in the newborn: the evidence base for blood-spot screening.

Bridget Wilcken1.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the evidence of benefit resulting from newborn screening in Australia as well as for some of those disorders not yet included in the Australian panels, and discusses briefly disorders under active consideration for inclusion in the screening panels.There is solid evidence of benefit from newborn screening for phenylketonuria, congenital hypothyroidism, cystic fibrosis, and overall for the disorders included in tandem mass spectrometry screening. There is also some evidence of benefit for several disorders not screened for in Australia, including congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Harms resulting from screening include anxiety related to false positive results; adverse effects of unwarranted treatment for mild variants; unwanted genetic information; and the costs (opportunity costs) of screening. For well-run programs these harms are relatively small.Screening could become more effective with the development of good systems for rational consideration of disorders to be included, with the extended use of second tier testing to reduce the false positive rate, and with research on the most effective way to deal with mild variants. The most important aspect of increasing effectiveness is the full integration of the screening program, diagnostic laboratories, and the clinical service. This is already in place in Australasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22198252     DOI: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e32834e843f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathology        ISSN: 0031-3025            Impact factor:   5.306


  5 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of screening immune system function in at-risk newborns.

Authors:  Christopher J Pavlovski
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2014-07-31

2.  High correlations in gene expression between paired umbilical cord blood and neonatal blood of healthy newborns on Guthrie cards.

Authors:  Jaime Slaughter; Changshuai Wei; Steven J Korzeniewski; Qing Lu; John S Beck; Sok Kean Khoo; Ariel Brovont; Joel Maurer; Denny Martin; Madeleine Lenski; Nigel Paneth
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-07-24

3.  Screening criteria: the need to deal with new developments and ethical issues in newborn metabolic screening.

Authors:  John Forman; Fiona Coyle; Jill Levy-Fisch; Pat Roberts; Sharon Terry; Michael Legge
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-10-07

4.  Newborn screening: the genomic challenge.

Authors:  Harvey L Levy
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.183

5.  The health system impact of false positive newborn screening results for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: a cohort study.

Authors:  Maria D Karaceper; Pranesh Chakraborty; Doug Coyle; Kumanan Wilson; Jonathan B Kronick; Steven Hawken; Christine Davies; Marni Brownell; Linda Dodds; Annette Feigenbaum; Deshayne B Fell; Scott D Grosse; Astrid Guttmann; Anne-Marie Laberge; Aizeddin Mhanni; Fiona A Miller; John J Mitchell; Meranda Nakhla; Chitra Prasad; Cheryl Rockman-Greenberg; Rebecca Sparkes; Brenda J Wilson; Beth K Potter
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.123

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.