Literature DB >> 22197804

Applications of next-generation sequencing to phylogeography and phylogenetics.

John E McCormack1, Sarah M Hird, Amanda J Zellmer, Bryan C Carstens, Robb T Brumfield.   

Abstract

This is a time of unprecedented transition in DNA sequencing technologies. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) clearly holds promise for fast and cost-effective generation of multilocus sequence data for phylogeography and phylogenetics. However, the focus on non-model organisms, in addition to uncertainty about which sample preparation methods and analyses are appropriate for different research questions and evolutionary timescales, have contributed to a lag in the application of NGS to these fields. Here, we outline some of the major obstacles specific to the application of NGS to phylogeography and phylogenetics, including the focus on non-model organisms, the necessity of obtaining orthologous loci in a cost-effective manner, and the predominate use of gene trees in these fields. We describe the most promising methods of sample preparation that address these challenges. Methods that reduce the genome by restriction digest and manual size selection are most appropriate for studies at the intraspecific level, whereas methods that target specific genomic regions (i.e., target enrichment or sequence capture) have wider applicability from the population level to deep-level phylogenomics. Additionally, we give an overview of how to analyze NGS data to arrive at data sets applicable to the standard toolkit of phylogeography and phylogenetics, including initial data processing to alignment and genotype calling (both SNPs and loci involving many SNPs). Even though whole-genome sequencing is likely to become affordable rather soon, because phylogeography and phylogenetics rely on analysis of hundreds of individuals in many cases, methods that reduce the genome to a subset of loci should remain more cost-effective for some time to come.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22197804     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  114 in total

1.  Phylogenomics provides new insight into evolutionary relationships and genealogical discordance in the reef-building coral genus Acropora.

Authors:  Natalie L Rosser; Luke Thomas; Sean Stankowski; Zoe T Richards; W Jason Kennington; Michael S Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Phylogenomic Signatures of Ancient Introgression in a Rogue Lineage of Darters (Teleostei: Percidae).

Authors:  Daniel J MacGuigan; Thomas J Near
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Applying genomic data in wildlife monitoring: Development guidelines for genotyping degraded samples with reduced single nucleotide polymorphism panels.

Authors:  Alina von Thaden; Carsten Nowak; Annika Tiesmeyer; Tobias E Reiners; Paulo C Alves; Leslie A Lyons; Federica Mattucci; Ettore Randi; Margherita Cragnolini; José Galián; Zsolt Hegyeli; Andrew C Kitchener; Clotilde Lambinet; José M Lucas; Thomas Mölich; Luana Ramos; Vinciane Schockert; Berardino Cocchiararo
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  Phylogenomics provides strong evidence for relationships of butterflies and moths.

Authors:  Akito Y Kawahara; Jesse W Breinholt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  High-throughput comparison, functional annotation, and metabolic modeling of plant genomes using the PlantSEED resource.

Authors:  Samuel M D Seaver; Svetlana Gerdes; Océane Frelin; Claudia Lerma-Ortiz; Louis M T Bradbury; Rémi Zallot; Ghulam Hasnain; Thomas D Niehaus; Basma El Yacoubi; Shiran Pasternak; Robert Olson; Gordon Pusch; Ross Overbeek; Rick Stevens; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard; Doreen Ware; Andrew D Hanson; Christopher S Henry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Reticulation, divergence, and the phylogeography-phylogenetics continuum.

Authors:  Scott V Edwards; Sally Potter; C Jonathan Schmitt; Jason G Bragg; Craig Moritz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phylogeographic model selection leads to insight into the evolutionary history of four-eyed frogs.

Authors:  Maria Tereza C Thomé; Bryan C Carstens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evaluating High-Throughput Sequencing Data of Microalgae Living in Melting Snow: Improvements and Limitations1.

Authors:  Stefanie Lutz; Lenka Procházková; Liane G Benning; Linda Nedbalová; Daniel Remias
Journal:  Fottea (Praha)       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.242

9.  The population structure and recent colonization history of Oregon threespine stickleback determined using restriction-site associated DNA-sequencing.

Authors:  Julian Catchen; Susan Bassham; Taylor Wilson; Mark Currey; Conor O'Brien; Quick Yeates; William A Cresko
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics.

Authors:  Julian Catchen; Paul A Hohenlohe; Susan Bassham; Angel Amores; William A Cresko
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.