Literature DB >> 22197517

The rewarding and locomotor-sensitizing effects of repeated cocaine administration are distinct and separable in mice.

Thorfinn T Riday1, Barry E Kosofsky, C J Malanga.   

Abstract

Repeated psychostimulant exposure progressively increases their potency to stimulate motor activity in rodents. This behavioral or locomotor sensitization is considered a model for some aspects of drug addiction in humans, particularly drug craving during abstinence. However, the role of increased motor behavior in drug reward remains incompletely understood. Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) was measured concurrently with locomotor activity to determine if acute intermittent cocaine administration had distinguishable effects on motor behavior and perception of brain stimulation-reward (BSR) in the same mice. Sensitization is associated with changes in neuronal activity and glutamatergic neurotransmission in brain reward circuitry. Expression of AMPA receptor subunits (GluR1 and GluR2) and CRE binding protein (CREB) was measured in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), dorsolateral striatum (STR) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) before and after a sensitizing regimen of cocaine, with and without ICSS. Repeated cocaine administration sensitized mice to its locomotor-stimulating effects but not its ability to potentiate BSR. ICSS increased GluR1 in the VTA but not NAc or STR, demonstrating selective changes in protein expression with electrical stimulation of discrete brain structures. Repeated cocaine reduced GluR1, GluR2 and CREB expression in the NAc, and reductions of GluR1 and GluR2 but not CREB were further enhanced by ICSS. These data suggest that the effects of repeated cocaine exposure on reward and motor processes are dissociable in mice, and that reduction of excitatory neurotransmission in the NAc may predict altered motor function independently from changes in reward perception.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22197517      PMCID: PMC3269519          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropharmacology        ISSN: 0028-3908            Impact factor:   5.250


  81 in total

Review 1.  Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues.

Authors:  Terry E Robinson; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Role of GluR1 expression in nucleus accumbens neurons in cocaine sensitization and cocaine-seeking behavior.

Authors:  Ryan K Bachtell; Kwang-Ho Choi; Diana L Simmons; Edgardo Falcon; Lisa M Monteggia; Rachael L Neve; David W Self
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Previous exposure to amphetamine increases incentive to obtain the drug: long-lasting effects revealed by the progressive ratio schedule.

Authors:  D S Lorrain; G M Arnold; P Vezina
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Withdrawal from chronic cocaine administration induces deficits in brain reward function in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Astrid K Stoker; Athina Markou
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Increased breakpoints on a progressive ratio schedule reinforced by IV cocaine are associated with reduced locomotor activation and reduced dopamine efflux in nucleus accumbens shell in rats.

Authors:  Christopher M Lack; Sara R Jones; David C S Roberts
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Cocaine but not natural reward self-administration nor passive cocaine infusion produces persistent LTP in the VTA.

Authors:  Billy T Chen; M Scott Bowers; Miquel Martin; F Woodward Hopf; Anitra M Guillory; Regina M Carelli; Jonathan K Chou; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Repeated administration of cocaine or amphetamine alters neuronal responses to glutamate in the mesoaccumbens dopamine system.

Authors:  F J White; X T Hu; X F Zhang; M E Wolf
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Repeated electrical stimulation of reward-related brain regions affects cocaine but not "natural" reinforcement.

Authors:  Dino Levy; Maytal Shabat-Simon; Uri Shalev; Noam Barnea-Ygael; Ayelet Cooper; Abraham Zangen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Altered sensitivity to rewarding and aversive drugs in mice with inducible disruption of cAMP response element-binding protein function within the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Jennifer A Dinieri; Christina L Nemeth; Aram Parsegian; Tiffany Carle; Vsevolod V Gurevich; Eugenia Gurevich; Rachael L Neve; Eric J Nestler; William A Carlezon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Review. Neurobiological mechanisms for opponent motivational processes in addiction.

Authors:  George F Koob; Michel Le Moal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of opioid abuse potential: Insights using intracranial self-stimulation.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Megan J Moerke
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Effects of repeated treatment with methcathinone, mephedrone, and fenfluramine on intracranial self-stimulation in rats.

Authors:  J A Suyama; M L Banks; S S Negus
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Substance of abuse and movement disorders: complex interactions and comorbidities.

Authors:  Andres Deik; Rachel Saunders-Pullman; Marta San Luciano
Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev       Date:  2012-09

Review 4.  Intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse potential of drugs.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Laurence L Miller
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  MeCP2 phosphorylation limits psychostimulant-induced behavioral and neuronal plasticity.

Authors:  Jie V Deng; Yehong Wan; Xiaoting Wang; Sonia Cohen; William C Wetsel; Michael E Greenberg; Paul J Kenny; Nicole Calakos; Anne E West
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Central leptin signaling transmits positive valence.

Authors:  Amber L Alhadeff; Sineadh M Conway; Zhi Yi Ong; Hallie S Wald; Mitchell F Roitman; Harvey J Grill
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  Interactions between pain states and opioid reward assessed with intracranial self-stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Megan J Moerke; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Effects of the neuroactive steroid allopregnanolone on intracranial self-stimulation in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  A Leslie Morrow; C J Malanga; Eric W Fish; Buddy J Whitman; Jeff F DiBerto; J Elliott Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Levetiracetam has opposite effects on alcohol- and cocaine-related behaviors in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  J Elliott Robinson; Meng Chen; Alice M Stamatakis; Michael C Krouse; Elaina C Howard; Sara Faccidomo; Clyde W Hodge; Eric W Fish; C J Malanga
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Intracranial self-stimulation and concomitant behaviors following systemic methamphetamine administration in Hnrnph1 mutant mice.

Authors:  Kristyn N Borrelli; Carly R Langan; Kyra R Dubinsky; Karen K Szumlinski; William A Carlezon; Elena H Chartoff; Camron D Bryant
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.