Literature DB >> 22197268

Unexpected high responses to tuberculin skin-test in farmed red deer: implications for tuberculosis control.

J Queiros1, J Alvarez, T Carta, A Mateos, J A Ortiz, I G Fernández-de-Mera, M P Martín-Hernando, C Gortázar.   

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) in deer is a serious zoonotic disease of worldwide distribution. Detection of infected animals is usually performed using single or comparative skin-testing (SST/CST), although false responses due to sensitization to other mycobacteria may occur, hampering diagnostic specificity. We describe the evolution of the responses to the SST, CST and to an in-house serological assay in a red deer farm subjected to regular TB testing in southern Spain in an attempt to understand the dynamics of possible non-specific reactions occurring under field conditions. We performed 2288 skin-tests and ELISAs in nine sampling periods between May 2009 and January 2011. In May 2010, a strong increase in skin fold thickness in response to avian purified protein derivative (PPD) (mean=4.0mm, 95% CI=3.5-4.5) and bovine PPD (mean=1.8mm, 95% CI=1.6-2.0) was observed in yearling deer hinds (n=150), compared to values recorded for the same individuals in November 2009 (avian PPD: mean=0.7 mm, 95% CI=0.6-0.8 and bovine PPD: mean=0.7 mm, 95% CI=0.6-0.7) and in January 2011 (avian PPD: mean=2.2mm, 95% CI=1.9-2.4 and bovine PPD: mean=1.1mm, 95% CI=1.0-1.2). Using SST, 54 animals (36%) of the yearlings tested in May 2010 would have been classified as positive reactors, while none of them was positive in the CST. The five animals with highest skin fold increases to mycobacterial antigens were culled and subjected to post-mortem analysis, which confirmed the absence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) infection but demonstrated the presence of environmental mycobacteria and closely related bacteria in four out of the five analyzed animals. Our results demonstrated how non-specific responses to mycobacterial antigens can adversely affect the specificity of TB diagnosis based on the SST. Thus, once TB infection has been ruled out using confirmatory techniques, application of comparative diagnostic tests is highly advisable to maximize test specificity and avoid the slaughter of false positive reactors. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22197268     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  6 in total

1.  Effects of repeated comparative intradermal tuberculin testing on test results: a longitudinal study in TB-free red deer.

Authors:  Azlan Che-Amat; Maria Ángeles Risalde; David González-Barrio; Jose Antonio Ortíz; Christian Gortázar
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Development and evaluation of an interferon gamma assay for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in red deer experimentally infected with Mycobacterium bovis.

Authors:  María Ángeles Risalde; Jobin Thomas; Iker Sevilla; Miriam Serrano; Jose Antonio Ortíz; Joseba Garrido; Mercedes Domínguez; Lucas Domínguez; Christian Gortázar; Jose Francisco Ruíz-Fons
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Towards risk-based test protocols: estimating the contribution of intensive testing to the UK bovine tuberculosis problem.

Authors:  Jan van Dijk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Use of ethanol extract of Mycobacterium bovis for detection of specific antibodies in sera of farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus) with bovine tuberculosis.

Authors:  Ashutosh Wadhwa; Rachel E Johnson; Colin G Mackintosh; J Frank T Griffin; W Ray Waters; John P Bannantine; Shigetoshi Eda
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Diagnostics of tuberculosis and differentiation of nonspecific tuberculin reactions in animals.

Authors:  Sovetzhan Z Basybekov; Marat B Bazarbayev; Bolat A Yespembetov; Assiya Mussaeva; Serik G Kanatbayev; Kanapya M Romashev; Aigul K Dossanova; Tokseiit A Yelekeyev; Elmira K Akmatova; Nazym S Syrym
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 6.  Diagnosis of tuberculosis in wildlife: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jobin Thomas; Ana Balseiro; Christian Gortázar; María A Risalde
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.683

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.