Literature DB >> 22197229

Monitoring dosimetric impact of weight loss with kilovoltage (kV) cone beam CT (CBCT) during parotid-sparing IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy.

Kean Fatt Ho1, Tom Marchant, Chris Moore, Gareth Webster, Carl Rowbottom, Hazel Penington, Lip Lee, Beng Yap, Andrew Sykes, Nick Slevin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Parotid-sparing head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can reduce long-term xerostomia. However, patients frequently experience weight loss and tumor shrinkage during treatment. We evaluate the use of kilovoltage (kV) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for dose monitoring and examine if the dosimetric impact of such changes on the parotid and critical neural structures warrants replanning during treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer were treated with contralateral parotid-sparing IMRT concurrently with platinum-based chemotherapy. Mean doses of 65 Gy and 54 Gy were delivered to clinical target volume (CTV)1 and CTV2, respectively, in 30 daily fractions. CBCT was prospectively acquired weekly. Each CBCT was coregistered with the planned isocenter. The spinal cord, brainstem, parotids, larynx, and oral cavity were outlined on each CBCT. Dose distributions were recalculated on the CBCT after correcting the gray scale to provide accurate Hounsfield calibration, using the original IMRT plan configuration.
RESULTS: Planned contralateral parotid mean doses were not significantly different to those delivered during treatment (p > 0.1). Ipsilateral and contralateral parotids showed a mean reduction in volume of 29.7% and 28.4%, respectively. There was no significant difference between planned and delivered maximum dose to the brainstem (p = 0.6) or spinal cord (p = 0.2), mean dose to larynx (p = 0.5) and oral cavity (p = 0.8). End-of-treatment mean weight loss was 7.5 kg (8.8% of baseline weight). Despite a ≥10% weight loss in 5 patients, there was no significant dosimetric change affecting the contralateral parotid and neural structures.
CONCLUSIONS: Although patient weight loss and parotid volume shrinkage was observed, overall, there was no significant excess dose to the organs at risk. No replanning was felt necessary for this patient cohort, but a larger patient sample will be investigated to further confirm these results. Nevertheless, kilovoltage CBCT is a valuable tool for patient setup verification and monitoring of dosimetric variation during radiotherapy.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22197229     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  28 in total

1.  Pattern and predictors of volumetric change of parotid glands during intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  G Sanguineti; F Ricchetti; O Thomas; B Wu; T McNutt
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Co-registration of cone beam CT and planning CT in head and neck IMRT dose estimation: a feasible adaptive radiotherapy strategy.

Authors:  C Yip; C Thomas; A Michaelidou; D James; R Lynn; M Lei; T Guerrero Urbano
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Impact of weight loss in patients with head and neck carcinoma undergoing radiotherapy: is it an underestimated phenomenon? A radiation oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  J Cacicedo; A Dal Pra; F Alongi; A Navarro
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Head and neck intensity modulated radiotherapy parotid glands: time of re-planning.

Authors:  Alba Fiorentino; Mariella Cozzolino; Rocchina Caivano; Piernicola Pedicini; Caterina Oliviero; Costanza Chiumento; Stefania Clemente; Vincenzo Fusco
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Differences between planned and delivered dose for head and neck cancer, and their consequences for normal tissue complication probability and treatment adaptation.

Authors:  Jolien Heukelom; Michael E Kantor; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Hesham Elhalawani; Esengul Kocak-Uzel; Timothy Lin; Jinzhong Yang; Michalis Aristophanous; Coen R Rasch; Clifton David Fuller; Jan-Jakob Sonke
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Cone-beam computed tomography dose monitoring during intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: parotid glands.

Authors:  A Fiorentino; M Cozzolino; R Caivano; P Pedicini; C Chiumento; C Oliviero; S Clemente; V Fusco
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Anatomic and dosimetric changes in patients with head and neck cancer treated with an integrated MRI-tri-60Co teletherapy device.

Authors:  Govind Raghavan; Amar U Kishan; Minsong Cao; Allen M Chen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Murat Surucu; Karan K Shah; John C Roeske; Mehee Choi; William Small; Bahman Emami
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-19

9.  A novel surface imaging system for patient positioning and surveillance during radiotherapy. A phantom study and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  F Stieler; F Wenz; M Shi; F Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Clinical evaluation of a commercial surface-imaging system for patient positioning in radiotherapy.

Authors:  F Stieler; F Wenz; D Scherrer; M Bernhardt; F Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.