Literature DB >> 22197199

Does a simple bedside sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava correlate to central venous pressure?

Robert A De Lorenzo1, Michael J Morris, Justin B Williams, Timothy F Haley, Timothy M Straight, Victoria L Holbrook-Emmons, Juanita S Medina.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bedside ultrasound has been suggested as a non-invasive modality to estimate central venous pressure (CVP).
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate a simple bedside ultrasound technique to measure the diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and correlate to simultaneously measured CVP. Secondary comparisons include anatomic location, probe orientation, and phase of respiration.
METHODS: An unblinded prospective observation study was performed in an emergency department and critical care unit. Subjects were a convenience sample of adult patients with a central line at the superior venocaval-atrial junction. Ultrasound measured transverse and longitudinal diameters of the IVC at the subxiphoid, suprailiac, and mid-abdomen, each measured at end-inspiration and end-expiration. Correlation and regression analysis were used to relate CVP and IVC diameters.
RESULTS: There were 72 subjects with a mean age of 67 years (range 21-94 years), 37 (53%) male, enrolled over 9 months. Seven subjects were excluded for tricuspid valvulopathy. Primary diagnoses were: respiratory failure 12 (18%), sepsis 11 (17%), and pancreatitis 3 (5%). There were 28 (43%) patients mechanically ventilated. Adequate measurements were obtainable in 57 (89%) using the subxiphoid, in 44 (68%) using the mid-abdomen, and in 28 (43%) using the suprailiac views. The correlation coefficients were statistically significant at 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.66), 0.51 (95% CI 0.23-0.71), and 0.50 (95% CI 0.14-0.74) for end-inspiratory longitudinal subxiphoid, midpoint, and suprailiac views, respectively. Transverse values were statistically significant at 0.42 (95% CI 0.18-0.61), 0.38 (95% CI 0.09-0.61), and 0.67 (95% CI 0.40-0.84), respectively. End-expiratory measurements gave similar or slightly less significant values.
CONCLUSION: The subxiphoid was the most reliably viewed of the three anatomic locations; however, the suprailiac view produced superior correlations to the CVP. Longitudinal views generally outperformed transverse views. A simple ultrasound measure of the IVC yields weak correlation to the CVP. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22197199     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  16 in total

1.  Can non-invasive ventilation modify central venous pressure? Comparison between invasive measurement and ultrasonographic evaluation.

Authors:  Maurizio Zanobetti; Alessio Prota; Alessandro Coppa; Laura Giordano; Sofia Bigiarini; Peiman Nazerian; Francesca Innocenti; Alberto Conti; Federica Trausi; Simone Vanni; Giuseppe Pepe; Riccardo Pini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  Echocardiography and Focused Cardiac Ultrasound.

Authors:  Darren Klugman; John T Berger
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.624

Review 3.  Clinical symptoms, signs and tests for identification of impending and current water-loss dehydration in older people.

Authors:  Lee Hooper; Asmaa Abdelhamid; Natalie J Attreed; Wayne W Campbell; Adam M Channell; Philippe Chassagne; Kennith R Culp; Stephen J Fletcher; Matthew B Fortes; Nigel Fuller; Phyllis M Gaspar; Daniel J Gilbert; Adam C Heathcote; Mohannad W Kafri; Fumiko Kajii; Gregor Lindner; Gary W Mack; Janet C Mentes; Paolo Merlani; Rowan A Needham; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Andreas Perren; James Powers; Sheila C Ranson; Patrick Ritz; Anne M Rowat; Fredrik Sjöstrand; Alexandra C Smith; Jodi J D Stookey; Nancy A Stotts; David R Thomas; Angela Vivanti; Bonnie J Wakefield; Nana Waldréus; Neil P Walsh; Sean Ward; John F Potter; Paul Hunter
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-30

4.  Changing trends of hemodynamic monitoring in ICU - from invasive to non-invasive methods: Are we there yet?

Authors:  Shubhangi Arora; Preet Mohinder Singh; Basavana G Goudra; Ashish C Sinha
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-04

5.  The caval index: an adequate non-invasive ultrasound parameter to predict fluid responsiveness in the emergency department?

Authors:  Silke de Valk; Tycho Joan Olgers; Mirjam Holman; Farouq Ismael; Jack Johannes Maria Ligtenberg; Jan Cornelis Ter Maaten
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Correlation between Central Venous Pressure and Inferior Vena Cava Sonographic Diameter; Determining the Best Anatomic Location.

Authors:  Bahman Naghipour; Gholamreza Faridaalaee
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2016

7.  A case of combined septic and obstructive shock: usefulness of bedside integrated cardiothoracic emergency ultrasonography.

Authors:  Maurizio Zanobetti; Eleonora De Villa; Delia Lazzeretti; Alberto Conti; Riccardo Pini
Journal:  Case Rep Emerg Med       Date:  2013-05-23

8.  Sonographic assessment of the inferior vena cava/aorta index measured with the transducer placed in the anterior median line and right anterior axillary line - a comparison.

Authors:  Monika Luboch; Magdalena Łoś; Łukasz Szmygel; Wojciech Kosiak
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2014-09-30

Review 9.  The efficacy of sonographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter as an estimate of central venous pressure.

Authors:  William Ciozda; Ilan Kedan; Devin W Kehl; Raymond Zimmer; Raj Khandwalla; Asher Kimchi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Time-Dependent Regional Myocardial Strains in Patients with Heart Failure with a Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Shane P Smith; Timothy W Secomb; Brian D Hong; Michael J Moulton
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.