Literature DB >> 22196396

Central hemodynamics and arterial stiffness during the finals of the world cup soccer championship 2010.

Michael Reppel1, Klaas Franzen, Frank Bode, Joachim Weil, Volkhard Kurowski, Susanne Annika Schneider, Johannes Baulmann, Tobias von Lukowicz, Wladimir Mirau, Eva Mortensen, Siegfried Wassertheurer, Heribert Schunkert, Kai Mortensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emotional stress is considered a risk factor for cardiovascular events, the underlying pathophysiology remains unclear.
METHODS: To evaluate how emotional stress effects hemodynamics, thirteen healthy German soccer fans (mean 37.6 years, 24-56 years) were studied during live TV coverage of the finals with German national team participation (GP) and the respective finals without German participation (noGP). Peripheral blood pressure, heart rate, central blood pressure, augmentation pressure and index, cardiac output and peripheral resistance were measured.
RESULTS: In the 1st hour before the match all parameters were not significantly different between the groups. In the GP group peripheral systolic pressure (1st halftime noGP 118 ± 1(s.e.m) versus GP 126 ± 2 mmHg, p<0.05, 2nd 117 ± 1 vs. 125 ± 2 mmHg, p<0.05), mean blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate (1st 73 ± 2 vs. 86 ± 3 bpm, p<0.05, 2nd 75 ± 2 vs. 87 ± 2 bpm, p<0.05), cardiac output (1st 4,4 ± 0,1 versus 4,8 ± 0,1L/min, p<0.05, 2nd 4,6 ± 0,1 versus 4,7 ± 0,11 L/min, p>0.05) and peripheral resistance were significantly increased compared to the noGP group during the matches. Systolic central aortic pressure (noGP: 101 ± 2 versus GP 107 ± 2 mmHg, p<0.05) and central pulse pressure (noGP: 31.3 ± 1.3 mmHg vs. GP: 38.5 ± 2.7 mmHg, p<0,05) remained elevated during the second hour after the match.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed persistent changes in central hemodynamics 2h after emotional stress. Despite normalization of peripheral values after the end of the finals, we observed prolonged elevation of central systolic blood and pulse pressure. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the increased risk of cardiovascular events in emotional stress.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22196396     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  6 in total

1.  Central hemodynamics and arterial stiffness in idiopathic and multiple system atrophy.

Authors:  Klaas Franzen; Sabine Fliegen; Jelena Koester; Rafael Campos Martin; Günther Deuschl; Michael Reppel; Kai Mortensen; Susanne A Schneider
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Aortic to brachial pulse pressure amplification as functional marker and predictor of renal function loss in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Siegfried Wassertheurer; Klaus Burkhardt; Uwe Heemann; Marcus Baumann
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Comparison of 24-Hour Ambulatory Central Blood Pressure Reduction Efficacy Between Fixed Amlodipine or Up-Titrated Hydrochlorothiazide Plus Losartan: The K-Central Study.

Authors:  Eun Joo Cho; Hae Young Lee; Ki Chul Sung; Sungha Park; Il-Suk Sohn; Chang Gyu Park; Dong-Ju Choi; Jong Won Ha; Young Keun Ahn; Jinho Shin; Soon-Jun Hong; Soon Kil Kim; Wook-Jin Chung; Byung Su Yoo; Taek Jong Hong; Ho Joong Youn; Myeong-Chan Cho; Shung Chull Chae; Young Jo Kim; Chong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Differential Effects of Angiotensin-II Compared to Phenylephrine on Arterial Stiffness and Hemodynamics: A Placebo-Controlled Study in Healthy Humans.

Authors:  Klaas F Franzen; Moritz Meusel; Julia Engel; Tamara Röcker; Daniel Drömann; Friedhelm Sayk
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Rationale and study design of the Prospective comparison of Angiotensin Receptor neprilysin inhibitor with Angiotensin receptor blocker MEasuring arterial sTiffness in the eldERly (PARAMETER) study.

Authors:  Bryan Williams; John R Cockcroft; Kazuomi Kario; Dion H Zappe; Pamela Cardenas; Allen Hester; Patrick Brunel; Jack Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Impact of mental and physical stress on blood pressure and pulse pressure under normobaric versus hypoxic conditions.

Authors:  Michael Trapp; Eva-Maria Trapp; Josef W Egger; Wolfgang Domej; Giuseppe Schillaci; Alexander Avian; Peter M Rohrer; Nina Hörlesberger; Dieter Magometschnigg; Mila Cervar-Zivkovic; Peter Komericki; Rosemarie Velik; Johannes Baulmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.