Literature DB >> 2219582

Current options in the management of clinical stage C prostatic carcinoma.

B Fallon1, R D Williams.   

Abstract

The evaluation of clinical stage C prostatic cancer has been enhanced by advances in staging modalities over the past 15 years. Better staging of the local lesion is possible with transrectal ultrasound-guided multiple biopsies of the prostate and its vicinity. Biopsies of suspect pelvic lymph nodes guided by CT (or lymphangiography) may obviate pelvic lymphadenectomy, particularly in patients with high-grade stage C lesions. Advances in the understanding of serum markers have supplemented other staging information. No single therapeutic modality is appropriate for all cases of clinical stage C cancer. In C1 lesions, radical prostatectomy with adjunctive radiation or hormonal therapy seems to produce the best 5- and 10-year survival rates. External-beam radiation alone, or in combination with interstitial radiation, may have equivalent success. In clinical stage C2 disease, external-beam radiotherapy seems at present to be the best therapeutic modality. Interstitial radiation as a sole method of management in stage C disease carries a high local recurrence rate and a significant risk of metastatic progression. Transurethral prostatectomy and hormonal treatment continue to have a place in the management of selected poor-risk patients. The current results with surgery or radiation therapy alone are less than ideal. It is recommended that aggressive combination treatment be compared with monotherapy in randomized clinical trials monitored jointly by radiation and urologic oncologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2219582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  7 in total

Review 1.  The status of surgery in the management of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Bach; Sailaja Pisipati; Datesh Daneshwar; Mark Wright; Edward Rowe; David Gillatt; Raj Persad; Anthony Koupparis
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [Localized intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  S Tritschler; U Ganswindt; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Heterogeneous oncologic outcomes according to surgical pathology in high-risk prostate cancer: implications for better risk stratification and preoperative prediction of oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Seung-Kwon Choi; Myungsun Shim; Myong Kim; Myungchan Park; Sangmi Lee; Cheryn Song; Hyung-Lae Lee; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Multimodal approaches to high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Koupparis; M E Gleave
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Radical prostatectomy for high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer: a prospective single institution series.

Authors:  Anthony J Koupparis; Jeremy P Grummet; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Robert H Bell; Nicholas Buchan; S Larry Goldenberg; Martin E Gleave
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  The long-term outcomes of radical prostatectomy for very high-risk prostate cancer pT3b-T4 N0-1 on definitive histopathology.

Authors:  Jan Kliment; Boris Elias; Katarina Baluchova; Jan Kliment
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-01-03

7.  Estrogen receptor (α and β) but not androgen receptor expression is correlated with recurrence, progression and survival in post prostatectomy T3N0M0 locally advanced prostate cancer in an urban Greek population.

Authors:  Georgios Megas; Michael Chrisofos; Ioannis Anastasiou; Aida Tsitlidou; Theodosia Choreftaki; Charalampos Deliveliotis
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.