Literature DB >> 22195735

Whole-breast irradiation: a subgroup analysis of criteria to stratify for prone position treatment.

Sara Ramella1, Lucio Trodella, Edy Ippolito, Michele Fiore, Francesco Cellini, Gerardina Stimato, Diego Gaudino, Carlo Greco, Sara Ramponi, Eugenio Cammilluzzi, Claudio Cesarini, Angelo Piermattei, Alfredo Cesario, Rolando Maria D'Angelillo.   

Abstract

To select among breast cancer patients and according to breast volume size those who may benefit from 3D conformal radiotherapy after conservative surgery applied with prone-position technique. Thirty-eight patients with early-stage breast cancer were grouped according to the target volume (TV) measured in the supine position: small (≤400 mL), medium (400-700 mL), and large (≥700 ml). An ad-hoc designed and built device was used for prone set-up to displace the contralateral breast away from the tangential field borders. All patients underwent treatment planning computed tomography in both the supine and prone positions. Dosimetric data to explore dose distribution and volume of normal tissue irradiated were calculated for each patient in both positions. Homogeneity index, hot spot areas, the maximum dose, and the lung constraints were significantly reduced in the prone position (p < 0.05). The maximum heart distance and the V(5Gy) did not vary consistently in the 2 positions (p = 0.06 and p = 0.7, respectively). The number of necessary monitor units was significantly higher in the supine position (312 vs. 232, p < 0.0001). The subgroups analysis pointed out the advantage in lung sparing in all TV groups (small, medium and large) for all the evaluated dosimetric constraints (central lung distance, maximum lung distance, and V(5Gy), p < 0.0001). In the small TV group, a dose reduction in nontarget areas of 22% in the prone position was detected (p = 0.056); in the medium and high TV groups, the difference was of about -10% (p = NS). The decrease in hot spot areas in nontarget tissues was 73%, 47%, and 80% for small, medium, and large TVs in the prone position, respectively. Although prone breast radiotherapy is normally proposed in patients with breasts of large dimensions, this study gives evidence of dosimetric benefit in all patient subgroups irrespective of breast volume size.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22195735     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  10 in total

1.  A new three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique for large breast and/or high body mass index patients: evaluation of a novel fields assessment aimed to reduce extra-target-tissue irradiation.

Authors:  Stimato Gerardina; Ippolito Edy; Silipigni Sonia; Di Venanzio Cristina; Rinaldi Carla Germana; Gaudino Diego; Fiore Michele; Trodella Lucio; D'Angelillo Rolando Maria; Ramella Sara
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Axillary lymph node dose with tangential whole breast radiation in the prone versus supine position: a dosimetric study.

Authors:  Kara Lynne Leonard; David Solomon; Jaroslaw T Hepel; Jessica R Hiatt; David E Wazer; Thomas A DiPetrillo
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 3.  Dosimetric evaluation and systematic review of radiation therapy techniques for early stage node-negative breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Tabitha Y Chan; Johann I Tang; Poh Wee Tan; Neill Roberts
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Breast size impact on adjuvant radiotherapy adverse effects and dose parameters in treatment planning.

Authors:  Ivica Ratosa; Aljasa Jenko; Irena Oblak
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Characterization of Respiration-Induced Motion in Prone Versus Supine Patient Positioning for Thoracic Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Christopher L Guy; Elisabeth Weiss; Mihaela Rosu-Bubulac
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28

6.  Is prone free breathing better than supine deep inspiration breath-hold for left whole-breast radiotherapy? A dosimetric analysis.

Authors:  Xinzhuo Wang; Odile Fargier-Bochaton; Giovanna Dipasquale; Mohamed Laouiti; Melpomeni Kountouri; Olena Gorobets; Nam P Nguyen; Raymond Miralbell; Vincent Vinh-Hung
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Prone versus supine free-breathing for right-sided whole breast radiotherapy.

Authors:  Odile Fargier-Bochaton; Xinzhuo Wang; Giovanna Dipasquale; Mohamed Laouiti; Melpomeni Kountouri; Olena Gorobets; Nam P Nguyen; Raymond Miralbell; Vincent Vinh-Hung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Radiation dose to the nodal regions during prone versus supine breast irradiation.

Authors:  Melinda Csenki; Dóra Ujhidy; Adrienn Cserháti; Zsuzsanna Kahán; Zoltán Varga
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  A dosimetry study precisely outlining the heart substructure of left breast cancer patients using intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ling-li Fan; Yang-kun Luo; Jing-hui Xu; Ling He; Jie Wang; Xiao-bo Du
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  External-beam partial breast irradiation in a supine versus prone position after breast-conserving surgery for Chinese breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Ting Yu; Min Xu; Tao Sun; Qian Shao; YingJie Zhang; XiJun Liu; FengXiang Li; Wei Wang; Jian Bin Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.